Elizabeth, as a shot injured person, I’m getting sick, tired and angry at all the double speak, obfuscation and lies about the truth, right from the origins of the shot, the origins of the mandates and the shot injuries. Who is behind all of this? Why was there no independent data collection on a technology never before tried on humans? Why were shot injuries ignored and silenced? Why were doctors who stood for their Hippocratic oaths demonized, smeared and threatened? I’m sick of it all and feel so frustrated at my lack of power to right a wrong. So many doctors, scientists, journalists can’t even make a dent even with evidence.
One major standout is this guy, he was leading "the race to create a COVID-19 vaccine"...you know...against a disease it was admitted from the beginning wasn't a serious threat to most people...
Whether it’s true or not but have read he was a regular at Jeffery Epstein’s island. Who knows, maybe that’s the reason for his marriage breakup. Gate’s name keeps popping up as a culprit to many distasteful things. With his more recent declaration on how profitable investing in medicine is , which I heard him say on a video, makes me wonder if he and pharma are tied at the hip. The accumulation of money is an addiction and like all addictions you want more at any cost.
Whistleblower Lt. Col. Dr. Peter Chambers Talks About Jab Injuries and Informed Consent (Excerpt)
"I said [to the general], sir, I said, that we have a regulation, its AR40 dash 562 chapter 8, paragraph 4, clearly states, under Emergency Use Authorization, I must do informed consent. It's a regulation, sir."
A proper informed consent leads to 99.8% of army soldiers refusing to get vaccinated
Army doctor Dr. Pete Chambers gave an informed consent briefing to 3,000 soldiers. After that briefing, just 6 soldiers wanted to be vaccinated. Chambers was subsequently relieved of his duties.
"What exactly does this mean - “unlawful as implemented?"
Have you not been paying attention?
Dear Leader just decrees reality now. You know that.
January 6 was a "day of love," over 700 people rioters that beat the sh-t out of police, invaded the Capitol, tore it up and smeared feces (of over 1200 charged) - they're heroic "patriots" now - Running multiple meme coin crypto grifts for billions of dollars while in office - That's fine now too.
So what it means, in reality, is nothing but Orangefuhrer is feeding more meat to the base.
Lots of vaccinations have long been required to serve in US military - any legitimate military. It was another vaccine for service members. And spare me your bullsh-t about "not a vaccine."
This is applicable to a few dozen of the very small number of people that ended military careers over a vaccine, that actually want back in.
"What does this mean?" It's fodder for you to stroke to.
I asked a specific question "What exactly does this mean - "unlawful as implemented"?
You haven't answered it.
You say: "Lots of vaccinations have long been required to serve in US military - any legitimate military. It was another vaccine for service members."
So you don't think service members should question vaccines - just do what they're told?
Voluntary informed consent for medical interventions, including vaccination, is supposed to be a bedrock medical ethical principle. If that principle is broken for one group, say the military, it puts everyone at risk.
And so it came to pass, as we saw with 'Covid', with the entire Australian population (16+) being subject to COVID-19 vaccine mandates to participate in society, and with many working people threatened with losing their livelihood if they refused to submit to COVID-19 vaccination - 'No Jab, No Job' to 'No Jab, No Life'.
Mandatory medical interventions/vaccinations in a so-called 'free country'.
In the U.S., enlistment in its enforcement arm (any branch of the U.S. military) means an entirely different "code of justice" applies. That code is the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).
At time of enlistment, a new recruit must understand that this organization requires a boatload of "vaccines." Many of these needles are required right before or at the start of basic training. Other times when the "leaders" can force "vaccinate?" At the time of deployment or when a "new" threat emerges. These come as direct orders; refusal brings on that military "code of justice."
Religious accommodation is sometimes made for those who invoke this right. The impact of the military's accommodation on that person's military "career?" Good question.
The military's authority to force vaccinate stems partially from one thing. That is, the needles they force on recruits are "approved" and have been shown to be "safe and effective."
The "COVID-19" garbage? To withstand scrutiny the order to inject, other "good" people in the "exceptional nation" had to lie. They had to lie that the garbage had received FDA "approval."
Lies. Criminality. Criminals. All across the fruited plain in the "exceptional nation."
Re “At time of enlistment, a new recruit must understand that this organization requires a boatload of "vaccines."”
Yes, this seems to be the presumption… But do people enlisting in the services give away all rights and freedoms, sacrifice their body to the state? Time to question this…
Yes, they do. They "put their lives on the line," for real. They must obey lawful orders like charging at the enemy.
Enough with the insulting nonsense that an ouchy arm is "sacrificing their body to the state," when many soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines, etc. have actually done that.
US military enlistees accept significant legal, physical, and personal obligations that differ from those of civilians. Service members become subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, a separate legal system from civilian law. This includes:
Restrictions on speech (e.g., insubordination, criticism of leadership)
Strict conduct expectations (e.g., no adultery, no disobedience)
Criminal prosecution by court-martial for violations
Obligation of Service: Sign contract (usually 4–6 yrs. active duty) where:
They agree to follow all lawful orders
They can be deployed to hazardous or combat zones
They may not resign or walk away like civilians can
Medical and Physical Authority:
The military mandates treatments, preventives, vaccinations, surgeries, and fitness regimens
Refusal may result in disciplinary action or discharge
Over 15-billion mRNA COVID vaccination doses have been administered worldwide; Over 750-million in USA.
For an actually controversial US military vaccination program, look to the 1998 to 2008 BioThrax anthrax vaccine.
Essentially, they do, at least as it regards medical interventions such as "vaccination." This site gives a fair overview of the requirement and the consequences for refusing injection:
The thing is -- in the "free and brave" country of America, virtually all new recruits have had the list of injections required by entrance to military. They've had them -- over and over and over again. Depending on when their last shot of "X" was, a new recruit might be able to "get away with" only getting the anthrax "vaccine" or the "COVID-19" garbage -- although schools here in certain places were requiring that, too.
Might be time to rethink your "Vaccination is political" header. 'Vaccination' is not simply political; it is a more than a century old hoax, a ruse, a con (and a very lucrative one). I was effectively 'forced' to resign from the Australian Public Service in 1984 because I declined to be mandatorily 'vaccinated' against the supposed flu - which all front line staff had to subject themselves to (and they refused to consider me for a job as a lighthouse keeper on a remote island).
I’m back ‘ from Facebook bans , post Aus elections
Hmmm interesting content - and , yes. “ Informed consent “will ALWAYS get reposted & distributed throughout the MAGA network on face book AUSTRALIA...
Just so you know - last November , I established a FB - Contact Group for RFK contact - to facilitate to/ from messaging to the US - and RFK himself & , via under ministers , advising him, are capable of being contacted via this link -
Thanks for this very important post ,
Keep going ...’ something has to give - Donald & RFK are very very determined on this fundamental issue
Elizabeth, as a shot injured person, I’m getting sick, tired and angry at all the double speak, obfuscation and lies about the truth, right from the origins of the shot, the origins of the mandates and the shot injuries. Who is behind all of this? Why was there no independent data collection on a technology never before tried on humans? Why were shot injuries ignored and silenced? Why were doctors who stood for their Hippocratic oaths demonized, smeared and threatened? I’m sick of it all and feel so frustrated at my lack of power to right a wrong. So many doctors, scientists, journalists can’t even make a dent even with evidence.
Vivien, you ask "Who is behind all of this?"
One major standout is this guy, he was leading "the race to create a COVID-19 vaccine"...you know...against a disease it was admitted from the beginning wasn't a serious threat to most people...
Bill Gates: "...we don't know for sure yet if RNA is a viable platform for vaccines..." https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/bill-gates-we-dont-know-for-sure
Whether it’s true or not but have read he was a regular at Jeffery Epstein’s island. Who knows, maybe that’s the reason for his marriage breakup. Gate’s name keeps popping up as a culprit to many distasteful things. With his more recent declaration on how profitable investing in medicine is , which I heard him say on a video, makes me wonder if he and pharma are tied at the hip. The accumulation of money is an addiction and like all addictions you want more at any cost.
Debbie Lerman's new book may shed some important light. I haven't read it yet, just read her Brownstone essays. Jeffrey Tucker wrote the introduction.
https://brownstone.org/articles/the-deep-state-goes-viral-foreword/
Elizabeth Hart— thank you for keeping the spotlight on informed consent. It is absolutely vital to basic human dignity.
Relatedly—
Whistleblower Lt. Col. Dr. Peter Chambers Talks About Jab Injuries and Informed Consent (Excerpt)
"I said [to the general], sir, I said, that we have a regulation, its AR40 dash 562 chapter 8, paragraph 4, clearly states, under Emergency Use Authorization, I must do informed consent. It's a regulation, sir."
Transcript: https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/207095.html
Source video:
"Lieutenant Colonel Peter Chambers: If We Don't Stop This, Our Military Is Going To Be Decimated!"
Sunfellow On COVID-19, posted March 26, 2022
https://rumble.com/vyneoo-lieutenant-colonel-peter-chambers-if-we-dont-stop-this-our-military-is-goin.html
See related article:
A proper informed consent leads to 99.8% of army soldiers refusing to get vaccinated
Army doctor Dr. Pete Chambers gave an informed consent briefing to 3,000 soldiers. After that briefing, just 6 soldiers wanted to be vaccinated. Chambers was subsequently relieved of his duties.
by Steve Kirsch, March 26, 2022
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/a-proper-informed-consent-leads-to
Note: Link to the video on Odysee from that article is no longer extant.
"What exactly does this mean - “unlawful as implemented?"
Have you not been paying attention?
Dear Leader just decrees reality now. You know that.
January 6 was a "day of love," over 700 people rioters that beat the sh-t out of police, invaded the Capitol, tore it up and smeared feces (of over 1200 charged) - they're heroic "patriots" now - Running multiple meme coin crypto grifts for billions of dollars while in office - That's fine now too.
So what it means, in reality, is nothing but Orangefuhrer is feeding more meat to the base.
Lots of vaccinations have long been required to serve in US military - any legitimate military. It was another vaccine for service members. And spare me your bullsh-t about "not a vaccine."
This is applicable to a few dozen of the very small number of people that ended military careers over a vaccine, that actually want back in.
"What does this mean?" It's fodder for you to stroke to.
I asked a specific question "What exactly does this mean - "unlawful as implemented"?
You haven't answered it.
You say: "Lots of vaccinations have long been required to serve in US military - any legitimate military. It was another vaccine for service members."
So you don't think service members should question vaccines - just do what they're told?
Voluntary informed consent for medical interventions, including vaccination, is supposed to be a bedrock medical ethical principle. If that principle is broken for one group, say the military, it puts everyone at risk.
And so it came to pass, as we saw with 'Covid', with the entire Australian population (16+) being subject to COVID-19 vaccine mandates to participate in society, and with many working people threatened with losing their livelihood if they refused to submit to COVID-19 vaccination - 'No Jab, No Job' to 'No Jab, No Life'.
Mandatory medical interventions/vaccinations in a so-called 'free country'.
What a travesty...undertaken with the collaboration of the Australian Army via Operation COVID SHIELD: https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2021/08/op-covid-shield-national-covid-vaccine-campaign-plan.pdf
And you are a coward, insulting others while hiding behind your pseudonym.
In the U.S., enlistment in its enforcement arm (any branch of the U.S. military) means an entirely different "code of justice" applies. That code is the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).
At time of enlistment, a new recruit must understand that this organization requires a boatload of "vaccines." Many of these needles are required right before or at the start of basic training. Other times when the "leaders" can force "vaccinate?" At the time of deployment or when a "new" threat emerges. These come as direct orders; refusal brings on that military "code of justice."
Religious accommodation is sometimes made for those who invoke this right. The impact of the military's accommodation on that person's military "career?" Good question.
The military's authority to force vaccinate stems partially from one thing. That is, the needles they force on recruits are "approved" and have been shown to be "safe and effective."
The "COVID-19" garbage? To withstand scrutiny the order to inject, other "good" people in the "exceptional nation" had to lie. They had to lie that the garbage had received FDA "approval."
Lies. Criminality. Criminals. All across the fruited plain in the "exceptional nation."
Re “At time of enlistment, a new recruit must understand that this organization requires a boatload of "vaccines."”
Yes, this seems to be the presumption… But do people enlisting in the services give away all rights and freedoms, sacrifice their body to the state? Time to question this…
Yes, they do. They "put their lives on the line," for real. They must obey lawful orders like charging at the enemy.
Enough with the insulting nonsense that an ouchy arm is "sacrificing their body to the state," when many soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines, etc. have actually done that.
What are soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines etc 'putting their lives on the line' for exactly?
By vaccination, they aren't. Give reality a try.
Give answering the question a try…’Free Radical’…
What are they putting their lives on the line for?
You keep pestering in order to elicit hostility, so that you can whine about others' nastiness, and about "censorship."
I responded to your "question." Your premise is absurd.
What happened to you? Sure, now goading others is your thing. But what set you down this path?
Yes, Free Radical. Could you give answering Elizabeth's direct question a try.
US military enlistees accept significant legal, physical, and personal obligations that differ from those of civilians. Service members become subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, a separate legal system from civilian law. This includes:
Restrictions on speech (e.g., insubordination, criticism of leadership)
Strict conduct expectations (e.g., no adultery, no disobedience)
Criminal prosecution by court-martial for violations
Obligation of Service: Sign contract (usually 4–6 yrs. active duty) where:
They agree to follow all lawful orders
They can be deployed to hazardous or combat zones
They may not resign or walk away like civilians can
Medical and Physical Authority:
The military mandates treatments, preventives, vaccinations, surgeries, and fitness regimens
Refusal may result in disciplinary action or discharge
Over 15-billion mRNA COVID vaccination doses have been administered worldwide; Over 750-million in USA.
For an actually controversial US military vaccination program, look to the 1998 to 2008 BioThrax anthrax vaccine.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthrax_Vaccine_Immunization_Program
Essentially, they do, at least as it regards medical interventions such as "vaccination." This site gives a fair overview of the requirement and the consequences for refusing injection:
https://www.jordanucmjlaw.com/2023/01/are-service-members-required-to-have-certain-vaccines/
The thing is -- in the "free and brave" country of America, virtually all new recruits have had the list of injections required by entrance to military. They've had them -- over and over and over again. Depending on when their last shot of "X" was, a new recruit might be able to "get away with" only getting the anthrax "vaccine" or the "COVID-19" garbage -- although schools here in certain places were requiring that, too.
Thanks SheThinksLiberty, useful information.
I'm trying to find a US DoD website that lists vaccination requirements, but no luck so far.
Found this: https://usarmybasic.com/about-the-army/army-shots/
You're welcome, and thank you for that link.
How condescending and insulting was that page??? OMG.
Might be time to rethink your "Vaccination is political" header. 'Vaccination' is not simply political; it is a more than a century old hoax, a ruse, a con (and a very lucrative one). I was effectively 'forced' to resign from the Australian Public Service in 1984 because I declined to be mandatorily 'vaccinated' against the supposed flu - which all front line staff had to subject themselves to (and they refused to consider me for a job as a lighthouse keeper on a remote island).
And the killers get away with it!🤷♂️
If the supposed people of authority consider something as unlawful, why on earth would they demand it though a mandate? That to me sounds sinister.
Please review this case.
https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/coast-guard-vaccine-lawsuit.pdf
This is the case where the court claim that the military mandates for vaccine was UNLAWFUL ORDER!
The memo reads like the court case decision. Adding directives some that come from the court case.
Signed a DOD employee and military veteran retired. Pure blood!
Good morning Elizabeth...
I’m back ‘ from Facebook bans , post Aus elections
Hmmm interesting content - and , yes. “ Informed consent “will ALWAYS get reposted & distributed throughout the MAGA network on face book AUSTRALIA...
Just so you know - last November , I established a FB - Contact Group for RFK contact - to facilitate to/ from messaging to the US - and RFK himself & , via under ministers , advising him, are capable of being contacted via this link -
Thanks for this very important post ,
Keep going ...’ something has to give - Donald & RFK are very very determined on this fundamental issue
Les Kraft , is Les Catterwell, Les Katt