It simply didn't matter to Morrison whether the alleged novel virus had been proven to exist or not - In the end all that mattered to the treasonous moronic Morrison was the number of people that had fallen for the propaganda and mandate into taking the jab now proven to be the cause for excess deaths around the world.
Morrison had been provided by me with the opportunity to respond to clearly stated questions relating to the existence of the alleged novel virus he failed to address the point and completely failed to provide the required evidence.
In light of his failure to provide the required evidence I suggest it's time to turn the tables on Morrison, and his ilk.
No jab no pay? - Two can play that game !
No evidence - no generous perks funded by Australian taxpayers.
The UN appears more concerned about ensuring that people have access to these jabs instead of investigating the fraud of it all and that these jabs are now proven to be responsible for causing excess deaths around the world.
Incidentally, Elizabeth, a key element of informed consent is that the public must be told what is in the medicines or injections i.e. the entire contents. A hundred years ago, the BMA ran a campaign against what were called 'patent medicines' - concoctions which had secret ingredients protected by commericial-in-confidence conditions. To inform the public, the BMA had many of these products analysed and informed the public of their contents in a publication called 'Secret Remedies'. And now, lo and behold, we have the government itself conspiring to inflict by force on the public products which are in effect patent medicines, containing secret ingredients. Initially we were told by the then CHO that they contained mRNA - which was false. It was denied later that they contained DNA - though this was true. Informed consent is simply not possible under these circumstances,.
Wish I could say it was human folly, but it wasn’t. It was deliberate manipulation and propaganda, directed at peoples ignorance. Pre-Nuremberg politics. They knew better, but were driven by donars.
Stirling job Elizabeth. The day politicians became interested in health was a disaster for the Western democracies. It may be difficult for people who have grown up with constant government interference and bullying over health issues to see this - but health is a properly private matter between doctor and patient. The vast government health bureaucracies, the staggering amount of health regulation, and the ability of private capitalists (pharma) to rort the system are impoverishing entire nations and rendering once free peoples slaves to the state.
We're really being governed by the Administrative State - what used to be called the 'Public Service' - as well as by the politicians. The British famously governed India with a very small bureaucracy. But the British public service itself ultimately became so bloated that it provided the material for C. Northcote Parkinson's famous law: "work expands so as to fill the time available for its completion". Parkinson also noted the tendency of bureaucrats to increase the number of subordinate staff, irrespective of the amount of work (if any) to be done. To make matters worse, the bloated public service feeds Leftist agendas to the politicians.
But the biggest problem with modern democratic government - apart from the low calibre of elected politicians - is the influence exerted on them and on the leaders of the public service by private corporations. There is no question that the top public servants in Australia are mostly highly intelligent, very capable people. But look at the way the TGA was used by Pharma during Covid. I doubt there is very much actual corruption, but a huge amount of influence is still evident. The revolving door betwen senior posts in the public service and industry needs to be very firmly shut in my view.
In terms of 'control over our lives' - this has become a huge issue as the puny citizen faces the combined might of the Administrative State and the Surveillance State. I was horrified to hear, from my Victorian government, that the Covid 'emergency' restrictions on my freedom were "not a matter of human rights". The idea that the government will only use its vast powers of surveillance and control in my best interests is a complete delusion in my view. The Leftist totalitarian tendencies of the Administrative State are a huge problem. We need legal protections, in the form of stronger mechanisms to enforce our rights, and especially to limit the use of so-called 'State of Emergency' powers by government.
Have you ever tried to make a complaint to the Public Service...you know...the service that's supposed to be serving the public?
If you're interested in the exercise, have a go, see if you can find a way to make a complaint to the Australian Public Service Commission...good luck with that...
They all just ran up to Qld - where they could f k with state legislation , ( and no house of review ) to get their ‘ national cabinet , and fall into line with their PRECISE dictates from their NWO masters.... and ...presto
You have mandatory everything
Jab
No play equipment
No travel
No shop ...
.... need I go on
Morrison is the main man ,,,, Elizabeth ...you knew it then , & you sure know it now
This has been a gruesome experiment and a political power play, informed consent did not matter the only thing that mattered was getting the contents of the syringes into arms. Human rights were ignored and trashed with almost no resistance, it was not about health or disease prevention but most people unfortunately are still deluding themselves that it was. To me the most frightening thing is that almost no one apart from yourself is making this one of the most important issues we face today, this fraudulent crisis will happen again and our human rights will be obliterated again because not one thing has changed. Our rights as humans do not exist when our nefarious governments declare a crisis and this will be what they say it is.
Correct ...the WILLIAM BAY case has DISTINGUISHED the principle of Informed consent ...
If I had contracted an injury for that AZ original , ( and I still don’t know if I have , b t w ), then I could Sue AHPRA for NOT making my clinic friends ... apply informed consent principles , thus , using the BAY a case to do so.
Do you know the media site AFIPN - Australian Free Independent Press Network?
It is run by Luke Roughley, and was doing a brilliant job up to the end of 2022 when due to censorship, defunding, and issues he had to take a break. But he has it up and running again, and is looking for content particular about Australia, so I thought of you.
Hi Elizabeth, I know I have said this before but, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, for all your TIRELESS work in fighting back against this evil and madness of the Public Health Industrial Complex - you FIGHT FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS, and as an Aussie I am grateful, PROUD OF YOU, and in awe of your INTEGRITY - so thank you!
I also think that information about the distribution in the body of the injected material, the way it acts in the body, and manner in which it is eliminated from the body over time, is relevant to informed choice. This was effectively admitted by Australia's CHO when he reassured the public formally that the Covid injection "stays in the arm" and being "mRNA" only lasts a very short time (I think he said it was a matter of minutes, maybe hours).
The CHO was wrong about the injection containing natural mRNA - an error that was repeatedly made in promoting these products - but he was also very wrong about how long the contents lasted in the body (it proved to be months) and where they went in the body (it proved to be everywhere, including the brain, the ovaries etc.). He also failed to mention in so many words that the mechanism of action of the injections was NOT like a normal vaccine. The end result was an immune reponse from the body, but there was a completely novel intermediate step, namely the generation of the pathogen itself (the potentially deadly spike protein).
Surely all this is relevant to informed consent? Scientists today believe millions have been killed or maimed by the spike protein generated by these injections, though it was not an ingredient of the injection itself.
Precisely Elizabeth. They had no idea what was happening (which was largely nothing, apart from the harm they themselves were causing).
I worked for decades as a medical librarian/information specialist, and was recently retired at the start of 'Covid'. Once it became clear that a 'war' was being conducted against the alleged virus, enforcement of the 'narrative' and censorship became inevitable. For this reason, normal techniques of finding and evaluating scientific literature ceased to be effective. World-ranking scientists had to publish on Twitter. World-ranking publications, like the Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine, were publishing rubbish, mostly written (or ghost-written) by alleged 'experts' with blatant conflicts of interest. To find reliable information it was necessary to cast a wide net - and to be skilled at evaluating the cedentials and credibility of scientific authors. I am quite certain that public servants like the Australian and state CHOs would have had zero properly evaluated scientific information on this topic. Meanwhile they were busy making their portentous pronouncements, their absurd plans, and their draconian regulations. They were acting blind to real information, guided purely by a politically-determined playbook. Furthermore, they did not even know where the playbook was written - or by whom - in the first place.
The arrogance with which our government officials imposed their utterly unscientific agenda on Australians is staggering. They demanded respect and obedience, but I am sorry to say they did not deserve either. In fact I think their behaviour, for all the pomposity of their absurd press conferences, was ludicrous. It was also infuriating. But it is a warning to Australians that the powers of government - especially so-called 'emergency' powers - must be restrained by new legislation,. This is very important for our future, if we are to avoid descending into a permanent totalitarian state.
Thank you Elizabeth. Thank you Stephen. Re "But it is a warning to Australians that the powers of government - especially so-called 'emergency' powers - must be restrained by new legislation,. " What form of legislation would you suggest ?
Ohhh this ‘ stay in the arm ‘ fallacy ....of course it opens litigation
It’s probably the largest statement of LIE in the entire procession of deliberate lies ,,, in public, in parliament , on ms media t v... this bull dust was mimicked everywhere , ad nauseum
And it was WRONG - a deliberate statement of un truth ...for me anyway
Thank you Elizabeth... no one in the nation can challenge you as the ‘ doyen of informed consent.
And yes,
I was one that waited for the avalanche in the wake of Bill Bay - less than a week it has been
It will be a Landmark case !
But only when some one prosecutes it ....these are my personal opinions ... I am NOT a lawyer ,,, I do NOT give advice
However - I make 3;observations
1/ ...... are now cowed by AHPRA ... this position is unchanged as far as I know - then again , medicos tend to keep ,, tut tut on these nasty issues ‘ .... if you follow
My opinion is. not much has changed - they remain totally terrified & captured
2/ you mention “ vaccinating practitioners “ .... I can speak to this , because it happened to me
Many, I m unsure , how many , arranged their “ vaccination requirements “ via clinics ,,, that may have, or may not have , been NOT IN THE NAME of the practising doctor .... hmmm , did they know they were doing wrong ..
Of course they did ..
I queried informed consent on my first visit to a “ clinic “ who used the patient list from the GP practice next door
/ same building !! When summonsed there to get an AZ shot
Their , the jabbing nurses on duty, words were - we don’t know what that is
When pushed further on informed consent - one nurse stated ...oh you mean like what Craig Kelly is talking about
Get that ,,, Hmmm
3/ informed consent is as compromised now, TODAY ... as it was in 2021 ...
So, I love your work , Elizabeth...you know that ,
But who do you propose will “ go after the guilt edged - golden opportunity to scold these bastards , once and fore all
I think....
Some one will - and it should involve at least 6 characters on the left of the decimal point ,
And involve , just one of the poor souls that became just a number on Mel McCanns list , sitting waiting to be seen & hard , in that DISGUSTING court ...
Thanks ... timely , thought provoking as usual ... p s when do we get into the rights “ involved
Your commitment regarding valid consent for ‘vaccination’ is very meritorious. This whole operation was department of defense worldwide by the world health organisation. There’s no more that anyone can do anymore it’s up for the individual to realise how they have been deceived by their own government. Is scotty still in Australia?
Whilst speaking ill of people is not gods way, it is very difficult to convey the absolute disgust for Morrison without using a LOT of expletives. All one can say is that, he professes to be a man of god, walks into the house of Jesus Christ but actually worships baphomet. One could not possibly do such evil and claim to worship the almighty.
It simply didn't matter to Morrison whether the alleged novel virus had been proven to exist or not - In the end all that mattered to the treasonous moronic Morrison was the number of people that had fallen for the propaganda and mandate into taking the jab now proven to be the cause for excess deaths around the world.
Morrison had been provided by me with the opportunity to respond to clearly stated questions relating to the existence of the alleged novel virus he failed to address the point and completely failed to provide the required evidence.
In light of his failure to provide the required evidence I suggest it's time to turn the tables on Morrison, and his ilk.
No jab no pay? - Two can play that game !
No evidence - no generous perks funded by Australian taxpayers.
I would love to see the tables turned on Morrison!
And the National Cabinet…and the AHPPC…for starters…
I think everyone does, apart from being treasonous what happened might even qualify as a crime against humanity.
Might? I think it’s definitely a crime against humanity.
I concur -
The UN appears more concerned about ensuring that people have access to these jabs instead of investigating the fraud of it all and that these jabs are now proven to be responsible for causing excess deaths around the world.
...oh... please , music to my ears
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMIb9HRKJJQ
Incidentally, Elizabeth, a key element of informed consent is that the public must be told what is in the medicines or injections i.e. the entire contents. A hundred years ago, the BMA ran a campaign against what were called 'patent medicines' - concoctions which had secret ingredients protected by commericial-in-confidence conditions. To inform the public, the BMA had many of these products analysed and informed the public of their contents in a publication called 'Secret Remedies'. And now, lo and behold, we have the government itself conspiring to inflict by force on the public products which are in effect patent medicines, containing secret ingredients. Initially we were told by the then CHO that they contained mRNA - which was false. It was denied later that they contained DNA - though this was true. Informed consent is simply not possible under these circumstances,.
Gosh, that’s interesting Stephen!
Thanks very much for bringing this to my attention.
Found this article in The BMJ:
Secret Remedies: What They Cost and What They Contain: https://www.bmj.com/content/338/bmj.b1624
Yes that's right Elizabeth.
Wish I could say it was human folly, but it wasn’t. It was deliberate manipulation and propaganda, directed at peoples ignorance. Pre-Nuremberg politics. They knew better, but were driven by donars.
ABSOLUTELY agree
Stirling job Elizabeth. The day politicians became interested in health was a disaster for the Western democracies. It may be difficult for people who have grown up with constant government interference and bullying over health issues to see this - but health is a properly private matter between doctor and patient. The vast government health bureaucracies, the staggering amount of health regulation, and the ability of private capitalists (pharma) to rort the system are impoverishing entire nations and rendering once free peoples slaves to the state.
There’s a staggering amount of government/regulation interference in our lives Stephen.
Those seat warmers in the Parliaments seem to spend all their time tying us up in more and more legislation.
How do we escape the snare of all this control over our lives we haven’t consented to?
We're really being governed by the Administrative State - what used to be called the 'Public Service' - as well as by the politicians. The British famously governed India with a very small bureaucracy. But the British public service itself ultimately became so bloated that it provided the material for C. Northcote Parkinson's famous law: "work expands so as to fill the time available for its completion". Parkinson also noted the tendency of bureaucrats to increase the number of subordinate staff, irrespective of the amount of work (if any) to be done. To make matters worse, the bloated public service feeds Leftist agendas to the politicians.
But the biggest problem with modern democratic government - apart from the low calibre of elected politicians - is the influence exerted on them and on the leaders of the public service by private corporations. There is no question that the top public servants in Australia are mostly highly intelligent, very capable people. But look at the way the TGA was used by Pharma during Covid. I doubt there is very much actual corruption, but a huge amount of influence is still evident. The revolving door betwen senior posts in the public service and industry needs to be very firmly shut in my view.
In terms of 'control over our lives' - this has become a huge issue as the puny citizen faces the combined might of the Administrative State and the Surveillance State. I was horrified to hear, from my Victorian government, that the Covid 'emergency' restrictions on my freedom were "not a matter of human rights". The idea that the government will only use its vast powers of surveillance and control in my best interests is a complete delusion in my view. The Leftist totalitarian tendencies of the Administrative State are a huge problem. We need legal protections, in the form of stronger mechanisms to enforce our rights, and especially to limit the use of so-called 'State of Emergency' powers by government.
Thanks for your thoughtful comment Stephen.
Re the 'Public Service'...
Have you ever tried to make a complaint to the Public Service...you know...the service that's supposed to be serving the public?
If you're interested in the exercise, have a go, see if you can find a way to make a complaint to the Australian Public Service Commission...good luck with that...
Cant just blame the pollies
They all just ran up to Qld - where they could f k with state legislation , ( and no house of review ) to get their ‘ national cabinet , and fall into line with their PRECISE dictates from their NWO masters.... and ...presto
You have mandatory everything
Jab
No play equipment
No travel
No shop ...
.... need I go on
Morrison is the main man ,,,, Elizabeth ...you knew it then , & you sure know it now
Yes, Morrison, definitely in the frame...with lots of others.
The whole thing was just DISGUSTING!
This has been a gruesome experiment and a political power play, informed consent did not matter the only thing that mattered was getting the contents of the syringes into arms. Human rights were ignored and trashed with almost no resistance, it was not about health or disease prevention but most people unfortunately are still deluding themselves that it was. To me the most frightening thing is that almost no one apart from yourself is making this one of the most important issues we face today, this fraudulent crisis will happen again and our human rights will be obliterated again because not one thing has changed. Our rights as humans do not exist when our nefarious governments declare a crisis and this will be what they say it is.
But Amat, informed consent DOES matter…the Australian Government says so…
“Informed consent should be obtained for every COVID-19 vaccination, as per usual consent procedures for other vaccinations.”
https://vaccinationispolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/mc22-018819-signed-highlighted-1.pdf
But that hasn’t been happening as we know…
Just have to patiently keep plugging away on this…
Correct ...the WILLIAM BAY case has DISTINGUISHED the principle of Informed consent ...
If I had contracted an injury for that AZ original , ( and I still don’t know if I have , b t w ), then I could Sue AHPRA for NOT making my clinic friends ... apply informed consent principles , thus , using the BAY a case to do so.
Correct ...and the same reason , that DESPITE A REQUEST FROM A SENATOR IN OUR OWN PARLIAMENT-
The vaccine supply contract was NEVER TABLED ...
Why was that, ya reckon ...
Hi Elizabeth,
Do you know the media site AFIPN - Australian Free Independent Press Network?
It is run by Luke Roughley, and was doing a brilliant job up to the end of 2022 when due to censorship, defunding, and issues he had to take a break. But he has it up and running again, and is looking for content particular about Australia, so I thought of you.
https://afipn.com/
And you can reach Luke at support@afipn.com
Best,
Ivan
p.s If you know any other writers that might like this link please share.
Thanks Ivan, I'll look into it. x
Hi Elizabeth, I know I have said this before but, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, for all your TIRELESS work in fighting back against this evil and madness of the Public Health Industrial Complex - you FIGHT FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS, and as an Aussie I am grateful, PROUD OF YOU, and in awe of your INTEGRITY - so thank you!
Ivan
Thanks very much for your support Ivan, and all the work you do.
We’ve just got to stick with this, pursue accountability for the crimes committed.
We shall E H ..... we shall
Don’t you want the good news !
Dj t marches closer to the 20th Jan , 2025 with a bomb under each arm , so to speak
He has , admissions, already made by certain CDC ‘ folk , under one arm
And a fully loaded RFK ... bazooka , with plenty , under the other arm
Wait till then , have a merry Christmas , in the knowing that certain admissions have been made already
Rest easy , pure Heart - Elizabeth .... let them take out the trash ....
Love ya work , mate
Hi Les, not sure I share you confidence about Trump and co, but we shall see…
In the meantime, will plough on seeking accountability here.
Yes we do, and yes we will. :)
I also think that information about the distribution in the body of the injected material, the way it acts in the body, and manner in which it is eliminated from the body over time, is relevant to informed choice. This was effectively admitted by Australia's CHO when he reassured the public formally that the Covid injection "stays in the arm" and being "mRNA" only lasts a very short time (I think he said it was a matter of minutes, maybe hours).
The CHO was wrong about the injection containing natural mRNA - an error that was repeatedly made in promoting these products - but he was also very wrong about how long the contents lasted in the body (it proved to be months) and where they went in the body (it proved to be everywhere, including the brain, the ovaries etc.). He also failed to mention in so many words that the mechanism of action of the injections was NOT like a normal vaccine. The end result was an immune reponse from the body, but there was a completely novel intermediate step, namely the generation of the pathogen itself (the potentially deadly spike protein).
Surely all this is relevant to informed consent? Scientists today believe millions have been killed or maimed by the spike protein generated by these injections, though it was not an ingredient of the injection itself.
These people didn’t have a clue what they were doing.
There is NO VALID CONSENT.
Precisely Elizabeth. They had no idea what was happening (which was largely nothing, apart from the harm they themselves were causing).
I worked for decades as a medical librarian/information specialist, and was recently retired at the start of 'Covid'. Once it became clear that a 'war' was being conducted against the alleged virus, enforcement of the 'narrative' and censorship became inevitable. For this reason, normal techniques of finding and evaluating scientific literature ceased to be effective. World-ranking scientists had to publish on Twitter. World-ranking publications, like the Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine, were publishing rubbish, mostly written (or ghost-written) by alleged 'experts' with blatant conflicts of interest. To find reliable information it was necessary to cast a wide net - and to be skilled at evaluating the cedentials and credibility of scientific authors. I am quite certain that public servants like the Australian and state CHOs would have had zero properly evaluated scientific information on this topic. Meanwhile they were busy making their portentous pronouncements, their absurd plans, and their draconian regulations. They were acting blind to real information, guided purely by a politically-determined playbook. Furthermore, they did not even know where the playbook was written - or by whom - in the first place.
The arrogance with which our government officials imposed their utterly unscientific agenda on Australians is staggering. They demanded respect and obedience, but I am sorry to say they did not deserve either. In fact I think their behaviour, for all the pomposity of their absurd press conferences, was ludicrous. It was also infuriating. But it is a warning to Australians that the powers of government - especially so-called 'emergency' powers - must be restrained by new legislation,. This is very important for our future, if we are to avoid descending into a permanent totalitarian state.
Thank you Elizabeth. Thank you Stephen. Re "But it is a warning to Australians that the powers of government - especially so-called 'emergency' powers - must be restrained by new legislation,. " What form of legislation would you suggest ?
I think in the first instance Shirley we have to expose the scandal that has occurred...it's pretty huge...
Spot on Stephen: "The arrogance with which our government officials imposed their utterly unscientific agenda on Australians is staggering."
Breath-taking arrogance...
They were soldiers following orders, just like the injecting practitioners: https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/just-following-orders
Can we find a way to bring them to account?
By consider the information in my paper for instance: Misfeasance in Public Office? The Destruction of Voluntary Informed Consent for Vaccination, June 2024: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/misfeasance-in-public-office-the-destruction-of-voluntary-informed-consent-for-vaccination.pdf
Ohhh this ‘ stay in the arm ‘ fallacy ....of course it opens litigation
It’s probably the largest statement of LIE in the entire procession of deliberate lies ,,, in public, in parliament , on ms media t v... this bull dust was mimicked everywhere , ad nauseum
And it was WRONG - a deliberate statement of un truth ...for me anyway
Lots of lies...
I’m going to sneak a Merry Christmas in here , Elizabeth... your tenacity is the ‘ stuff of legends
Roll on 20 th Jan, 2025
Thanks Les, Merry Christmas to you too :)
Jane Halton is the string puller for gates & the who etc in Australia. Remember their names
Absolutely! Major player...
Thank you Elizabeth... no one in the nation can challenge you as the ‘ doyen of informed consent.
And yes,
I was one that waited for the avalanche in the wake of Bill Bay - less than a week it has been
It will be a Landmark case !
But only when some one prosecutes it ....these are my personal opinions ... I am NOT a lawyer ,,, I do NOT give advice
However - I make 3;observations
1/ ...... are now cowed by AHPRA ... this position is unchanged as far as I know - then again , medicos tend to keep ,, tut tut on these nasty issues ‘ .... if you follow
My opinion is. not much has changed - they remain totally terrified & captured
2/ you mention “ vaccinating practitioners “ .... I can speak to this , because it happened to me
Many, I m unsure , how many , arranged their “ vaccination requirements “ via clinics ,,, that may have, or may not have , been NOT IN THE NAME of the practising doctor .... hmmm , did they know they were doing wrong ..
Of course they did ..
I queried informed consent on my first visit to a “ clinic “ who used the patient list from the GP practice next door
/ same building !! When summonsed there to get an AZ shot
Their , the jabbing nurses on duty, words were - we don’t know what that is
When pushed further on informed consent - one nurse stated ...oh you mean like what Craig Kelly is talking about
Get that ,,, Hmmm
3/ informed consent is as compromised now, TODAY ... as it was in 2021 ...
So, I love your work , Elizabeth...you know that ,
But who do you propose will “ go after the guilt edged - golden opportunity to scold these bastards , once and fore all
I think....
Some one will - and it should involve at least 6 characters on the left of the decimal point ,
And involve , just one of the poor souls that became just a number on Mel McCanns list , sitting waiting to be seen & hard , in that DISGUSTING court ...
Thanks ... timely , thought provoking as usual ... p s when do we get into the rights “ involved
In- alienable V. Un- alienable ...
For the victims , we beg
Les Kraft , is Les Catterwell
Just keep chipping away Les...
Your commitment regarding valid consent for ‘vaccination’ is very meritorious. This whole operation was department of defense worldwide by the world health organisation. There’s no more that anyone can do anymore it’s up for the individual to realise how they have been deceived by their own government. Is scotty still in Australia?
Erzsebet, individuals must have reliable information to make decisions.
But they have been deliberately mis/disinformed by 'authorities' they trusted.
It's now a matter of trying to spread critical information in the court of public opinion.
In regard to the World Health Organization, see: How can the World Health Organization support mandatory vaccination? This violates voluntary informed consent: https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/how-can-the-world-health-organization
Whilst speaking ill of people is not gods way, it is very difficult to convey the absolute disgust for Morrison without using a LOT of expletives. All one can say is that, he professes to be a man of god, walks into the house of Jesus Christ but actually worships baphomet. One could not possibly do such evil and claim to worship the almighty.
Stop calling the poison shots vaccines!
They are not!
It's a money making business! Not tested not safe! None of the childhood (vaccines) are tested for safety either!
What, exactly, is a vaccine?
Vaccine is a disease time bomb that WILL go off at some point in your life
There certainly must be an investigation into the burgeoning vaccination schedule, which is mired in conflicts of interest.