Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Finn's avatar

It simply didn't matter to Morrison whether the alleged novel virus had been proven to exist or not - In the end all that mattered to the treasonous moronic Morrison was the number of people that had fallen for the propaganda and mandate into taking the jab now proven to be the cause for excess deaths around the world.

Morrison had been provided by me with the opportunity to respond to clearly stated questions relating to the existence of the alleged novel virus he failed to address the point and completely failed to provide the required evidence.

In light of his failure to provide the required evidence I suggest it's time to turn the tables on Morrison, and his ilk.

No jab no pay? - Two can play that game !

No evidence - no generous perks funded by Australian taxpayers.

Expand full comment
Stephen Due's avatar

Incidentally, Elizabeth, a key element of informed consent is that the public must be told what is in the medicines or injections i.e. the entire contents. A hundred years ago, the BMA ran a campaign against what were called 'patent medicines' - concoctions which had secret ingredients protected by commericial-in-confidence conditions. To inform the public, the BMA had many of these products analysed and informed the public of their contents in a publication called 'Secret Remedies'. And now, lo and behold, we have the government itself conspiring to inflict by force on the public products which are in effect patent medicines, containing secret ingredients. Initially we were told by the then CHO that they contained mRNA - which was false. It was denied later that they contained DNA - though this was true. Informed consent is simply not possible under these circumstances,.

Expand full comment
49 more comments...

No posts