76 Comments

THANK YOU ELIZABETH!

Based on this fantastic presentation alone, I accuse South Australian Health and Community Services Complaints Commissioner (#HCSCC) Associate Professor Grant Davies of corruption in public office! Davies abdicated all responsibility for protecting South Australians from medical tyranny. Davies had no authority to ignore, undermine, rescind or override the rights, protections and obligations of health service providers under the HCSCC Code of Conduct and he had no lawful authority to issue Prohibition Orders on anyone surrounding COVID mandates or questioning government policy pertaining to vaccinations or health treatment protocols!

Davies’ failure to protect South Australians from the risk of harms caused by coercive and forced vaccination programs, treatment protocols and/or testing policies is criminal, indefensible and unforgivable and it is my hope those injured by his abuse of public office might start suing the Commissioner’s office itself. Davies acted far outside the laws governing his role and functions and he needs to be prosecuted personally, if there is to be any public accountability for the horrific “public health” outcomes unleashed on South Australians.

Expand full comment

just a quick note: being that both 'covid' and 'the covid response' is a US DoD led world-wide Military Campaign and the 'shots to save a nation' were developed by US DoD with both US DoD and DARPA having registered patents for 'the shots' with the US Patents Office, War Crimes have been committed

See section 2 of the 'AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT'©️™️1995 Criminal Code act to find the many Crimes committed

The whole lot of 'covid' had nothing to do with 'health'...

One would have to pretty bloody naive to think all the Poly Ticks and Bureaucrats didn't know about the 'World-Wide-Military-Campaign' as both the 'Lockdowns' and 'the vaccine rollout' where the Command Line Responsibility of the ADF... 'Lockdowns' was just a nice way of saying "Martial Law"

Being that a simple mechanical tool twirler and layman like me knew/know about the Military Campaign led by our ADF here in Australia, I'd suggest Every Poly Tick and Bureaucrat in the country knew/knows as well, which at the very least, makes them complicit in War Crimes under the 1995 Criminal Code

Expand full comment

There's certainly a lot to be exposed and investigated...

Are you familiar with the DemocracyManifest substack: https://democracymanifest.substack.com/

Expand full comment

No I am not familiar with that 'stack but I soon will be; Thanks Elizabeth

Expand full comment

The House of Cards lays on counterfeited trillions of fiat money. They'll never give you Informed Consent on being culled!

Read:

What’s your best way to wake-up those who didn’t yet?

The more the awakened, the sooner this nightmare will be over!

What’s your experience about asking for an opinion on the following topics?

Why is food poisoning legal? (Rumsfeld forced the FDA approval of Aspartame)

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/why-is-food-poisoning-legal

Your phone attacking with ultrasonic booms?

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/sound-of-silence-challenge

How could a father get 20 million dollars from the Government?

A 20 sec video of a baby with vax seizures?

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/autism-day-shall-we-celebrate-the

Your opinion about Big Pharma scandals?

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/system-failure-ai-exposes-zero-government

Ready for anti-COVIDiot pills?

Did you know that Fauci admitted that there was no scientific basis for social distancing?

https://thefederalist.com/2024/06/04/fauci-admits-there-was-no-scientific-evidence-for-six-foot-social-distancing-rule/

That the CDC admitted that masking was useless against COVID?

https://www.dailyveracity.com/2021/07/26/over-50-scientific-studies-conclude-masks-do-nothing-to-prevent-the-spread-of-illness-so-why-do-people-keep-claiming-they-work/

https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-08-28-cdc-admits-masks-totally-useless-against-covid.html

That you’ve been lockdowned for nothing? Johns Hopkins meta-analysis of 18000 studies proved that lockdowns didn’t work and worse, killed people by stopping those with cancer or heart conditions from getting testing and treatment

https://sites.krieger.jhu.edu/iae/files/2022/01/A-Literature-Review-and-Meta-Analysis-of-the-Effects-of-Lockdowns-on-COVID-19-Mortality.pdf

Could you please explain why no Health Agency researched the 30+ COVID effective cures, but instead censored and banned the doctors successfully applying them? Would a successful cure block the Emergency Use Authorization of the lethal vaccines?

http://c19early.com

http://bit.ly/research2000

Should every single vaxxed on the planet be suing Pfizer and Moderna for deliberately hiding human DNA plasmids in their vaccines, and Pfizer, for injecting an undisclosed carcinogenic monkey virus (SV40) sequence in the clueless biohacked, as officially recognized by Health Canada?

Failed again? Show 10 secs in the middle of this video (who doesn’t have 10 seconds for you)

https://odysee.com/@ImpossiblyWackedOutWorld:f/WTC-7-Free-Falling:8

(caveat about the beginning: pot destroys your brain + “Raises Risk of Heart Attack and Stroke”)

9/11: two "planes", yet 8 towers down. WTC7 imploded, free falling on its footprint, in a controlled demolition. It was out of reach as well as the unblemished Deutsche Bank. All 7 World Trade Center towers and that bank needed to be rebuilt, not the closer towers not belonging to World Trade Center...

The “owner” took an insurance policy for the WTC against terrorism, months before, when no one was taking them … he didn’t show up for work on 9/11 … just as his 2 grown up siblings.

The inside information about the FUTURE 9/11 event helped masons make trillions by shorting the stock exchange: the records were deleted by the SEC so they wouldn't be prosecuted !!!

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/911-2-planes-3-towers

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/107-911

There's a plan to slow-murder 95% of the global population by 2050… written on the masonic Georgia guide-stones: “Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 … ”:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/depopulation-or-extermination

Free 100 redpill movies and documentaries:

(don't miss the 1st one, 10 min at 2x, amazing tool for a discussion):

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/wake-up-videos

- Since the 90s, vaccines are weaponized to reduce the population by adding hCG to infertilize women: lab-detected in 30 countries, and overpassing the FDA 10 ng limit to human DNA “contamination” (tampering) by 2000%, thus causing neuro-damage (autism, asperger, tics, dyslexia in 29% of kids, etc.) and childhood cancer epidemic (n.b. leukemia, non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas). Check SoundChoice.org or videos.

- Excess deaths in the first 2 years: 40 million people killed by the lethal injections... so far. COVID was designed as a primer for even more lethal COVID haccines:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-real-covid-timeline

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/not-vaccine-not-gene-therapy-just

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/what-do-bioweapons-have-to-do-with

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/you-are-anti-haccine

Yet, the most important impact of the COVID haccines, population-wise, is lifelong infertility.

Births keep dropping even more dramatically. The infertility bomb will fully explode in 10-20 years, when the haxxed babies and children grow up.

Even if unhaxxed children evade self-replicating transfecting haxxines (replicons) and marry haxxed ones? ... just as planned, the only choice deliberately left, will be DNA-designed infertile transhumanized babies, for an ever dependency on immoral IVF (for every IVF-born, 25 are lost or murdered).

- You’ll go nowhere and you’ll be happy:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/2050-youll-go-nowhere-and-youll-be

- Elon's top secret: EVs cause cancer

Go green with gasoline!

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/electric-vehicles-cause-cancer

- You are the carbon they want to exterminate! Proven in 3:

1. No one denies that man affects the weather, but science disagrees with the official narrative.

Prehistoric data from ice cores proves that temperature rise precedes carbon release in the atmosphere, not the other way around.

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/best-scientific-sources-to-debunk

2. There's proof of deliberate geoengineering to increase global temperatures and droughts, and decrease albedo by dissolving clouds with satellite and Weather Radars’ Electro-Magnetic Frequencies.

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/satattack

3. Life involves a carbon cycle. A war on carbon is a war on life, causing crop/food scarcity, increase in food prices and famines. Decarbonization is part of the plan to exterminate 95% of us.

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/carbon-reparations

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/climate-deaths

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/killing-me-softly-with-green-songs

- Apart from sin-empowered demons, what is their main source of power? NOT a coincidence that the USA left dollar convertibility to gold in 1971, precisely triggering the exponential government deficit coupled with the trade deficit and inflation.

Taking down central banking doesn't solve the problem. Their source of free endless money is counterfeiting, fractional reserve banking and financial instruments (e.g. derivatives, debt over debt, compound interest above real growth, etc.). Also, insider information, sabotage, infiltration, manufactured news and events to create profitable market-movements.

This is the Achilles’ heel of all nations: the SSS (Satanic Secret Societies such as masonry) create trillions out of thin air and launder them through their Banks, foundations, and foreign loans and “aid”, with which they buy puppeticians and seats in the boards of the Federal Reserve (the only private-run Central Bank in the world), judiciary, corporations, media, healthcare, universities, foundations, political parties, etc.

The masons’ worst nightmare is that the daydreaming majority wakes up, finds out their crimes, and seek justice. We are a million to one. Until they achieve the CBDC digi-tatorship, they are walking on a tight rope.

We've got a very small window of opportunity to fight or ... die (they want to murder 95% of us).

President John Quincy Adams: “Masonry ought forever to be abolished. It is wrong - essentially wrong - a seed of evil, which can never produce any good.”

Who are The Powers That SHOULDN'T Be ?

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/criminal-intent

https://www.coreysdigs.com/global/who-is-they/

Weaponization of Justice

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/weaponization-of-justice

Illuminati David Rockefeller, finest quotes:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/david-rockefeller-illuminati

Confessions of ex illuminati Ronald Bernard:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/confessions-of-illuminati-ronald

Illuminati Attali, finest quotes:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/attali-illuminati-finest-quotes

Chisholm, father of the WHO’s global pedophilia

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/brock-chisholm-father-of-the-whos

Ex mason Serge Abad-Gallardo:

https://www.ncregister.com/interview/confessions-of-a-former-freemason-officer-converted-to-catholicism

16 laws we need to exit Prison Planet

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/laws-to-exit-planet-prison

Please share, not the articles, but the information! I'm expendable. Saving the free world, is not!

Expand full comment

They are all going to be brought to account , Matty , for their obscene crimes v humanity

Thanks for being you ,,,

Les

Expand full comment

Thank you Elizabeth ... & Matty .., I hadn’t heard of Davies & I considered myself a reasonably informed individual on the topic , close to my HART ... intended ... Informed consent - I helped call it from the rooftops , for 3 years now.

Elizabeth,,, the time approaches when this issue & many others become front of mind for many.

And we will , again, put it there -- because we know it was , and is , the key .... the cards are flimsy, teetering and ready to go !

I think the collapse will come on the 19 th January in the US - as the RFK - Trump juggernaut enacts it’s revenge.

I won’t be a soft & accomodating delivery at all,...nothing that TRUMP delivers will ever be.

It will be HARD , BRUTAL and unmistakably DIRECT and Confrontational- so let it be so.

Who will be the Hardest hit ?

What revenge will be metered out, & to whom ?

See more at MAGA - Make AUSTRALIA Great AGAIN ...

Thanks again Elizabeth... please join us on the MAGA site -

Les Kraft ,is Les Catterwell

Expand full comment

I'm not sure about your confidence in Trump, Les.

As I referred to in my presentation: Trump Dismisses COVID-19 Vax Safety Claims, Says He Saved 100 Million Lives, Newsweek, January 2023: https://www.newsweek.com/trump-says-he-saved-100-million-lives-covid-vaccines-1774178

Expand full comment

POTUS has legitimacy , ( elected ), enforcement capabilities, moral high ground, AND Power of veto

( let’s ask David E Martin next week on Hoody’s show when he has him on .)

WHO - WEF has Money , lots of it, and unfortunately it provides capital via its toy , The Fed Reserve & Larry Fink ...head of Blackrock ,,, ( I’m quite sure that remains the case , but I’ll check this shortly )

It has every. Freemason on the planet , via their ‘ closed meeting arrangements

Expand full comment

I’m all ears to our east , come the inauguration, Elizabeth- ok , that you have first hand knowledge of him, His ways are peculiar to say the least .

Nothing wrong with his radar & perception about the ‘ Gen populace ‘ there on his DOD involvement last time - so how good was the RFK appoint ... do,you give Trump Q dos for that ?

RFK a was a master stroke in this war ‘ , for that’s what it is - outright war for a supremacy of two worlds ..

The POTUS state , ( with DOD allegiance ),,, V. the WHO , Gates Fnd , DARPA , Big Pharma - Media cabal.

Who wins ?

Expand full comment

Les, American here. All I do is shake my head over Donald Trump. I really wonder sometimes if he really is as thick, as completely stupid, tone deaf, and oblivious as his comments make him out to be. (I'm also from New York. I was working in NYC when Donald Trump appeared regularly on the 𝑁𝑒𝑤 𝑌𝑜𝑟𝑘 𝐷𝑎𝑖𝑙𝑦 𝑁𝑒𝑤𝑠'𝑠 Page 6; my cousin worked for him at Trump Tower. I'm pretty familiar with the man.)

I must agree with Mark Hills. If "the Donald" continues to act as if that injectable junk was his gift to mankind? I mean, "his" "vaccine" saved hundreds of millions of lives??? Seriously? If he does (and I actually think it's too late for him to backtrack and claim he was lied to...), he is as guilty of war crimes as the rest of the lowlife scum slithering around governments across the world.

Though Trump did declare the national "emergency" that led to the activation of the PREP Act here (unLawful, criminal, and unconstitutional on its face), I place the guilt for the martial law (Mark is correct again here, and I will begin using that phrase instead of "lockdown") at the feet of 49 governors in the U.S. (The South Dakota Legislature prevented Noem from carrying out this crime of martial law, though she loves to take credit for it).

While we're relieved that Trump won vs. that other thing, his appointees since then have left many of us profoundly disappointed. It tells us -- RFK, Jr. aside -- that Trump really has not learned a GD thing. No juggernaut. More of the same, we believe...but I guess we shall see.

While it was bad here, it seemed to me that Australia went full-on bat shit, brutal crazy, and for that I am so sorry. Here in the States, there are still a few of us who stand on the American philosophy of liberty. We wore no mask, we stood where we pleased, we did not "test," we did not inject -- and some of us, like me, went so far as to quit their jobs and give up their careers instead of cooperating in any way with this greatest of global crimes.

Expand full comment

Yes, "Trump did declare the national "emergency" that led to the activation of the PREP Act here (unLawful, criminal, and unconstitutional on its face)"

What 'emergency'?

The 'PHEIC'...aka The Fake.

This Covid thing is a complete beat-up.

But they've used it to steal an awful lot of money...and our freedom...

Expand full comment

"national emergency" is just another way of saying "martial law"

"But they've used it to steal an awful lot of money...and our freedom..."

Just like 'The Patriot Act" did in 2001... I said at the time that '9/11' and 'The Patriot Act' was the beginning of the loss of our freedoms only to be told it was needed to combat 'terrorism'...and of course the obligatory "crazy conspiracy theorist" label was thrown my way...now look where we are with the whole 'terrorism' thing;

Any dissenting voice against GovCO is now an act of 'terrorism' and One can and does get locked up in a cage somewhere without trial after their home has been destroyed by the armed and dangerous Corporate Policy Enforcing goons of destruction

and yep, 'they' use it to steal an awful lot of money...and our freedom..

Expand full comment

Yes, no "emergency." No "pandemic." Dare I say it -- no virus. But PREP requires the declaration of a national emergency so our natural rights and their alleged Constitutional protections can get flushed down the toilet.

I knew it was an operation outta the gate. Tried talking to people, but to no avail. I also, having been beaten up for over a decade on 9/11 Truth, knew that facts don't matter once the "story" is out there and internalized by the majority. And neither does freedom to most "Americans." They prefer "safety" -- and proved it.

Because I knew the end game (the needles), I knew that my/our life as I knew would likely be ending before the end of 2020. And that it did.

I knew it was a done deal when "Americans" donned those damned snot pouches because a doofus in a corner office told them to...After two weeks to "flatten the curve," "they" tell you to cover your nose and mouth 8-10 weeks later -- and you do???

Expand full comment

yep, no virus ever proven by isolation from an 'infected' peoples blood in any laboratory anywhere in this world but we need to remember the definition of 'virus' was changed along the way to suit the Patented variety of a man-made Chemical Weapon...

I suspected from the outset that '9/11' was an inside job and of course I was attacked as a 'crazy conspiracy theory whacko' anytime I tried to connect 'the patriot act' and all the loss of freedom of movement that came with it; Trying to point out that anyOne accused of being a 'terrorist' (for any reason) under 'The Patriot Act' could simply be vanished into 'the system' without being 'charged' of a crime and without trial... still I was a 'whacko' in need of therapy for my 'paranoia'

Since then, all of the '5eyes' have been secretly busy creating new and strengthened "domestic terrorism laws" to the extent where the 'police' (Policy Enforcers) now all have specialist 'Domestic Terrorism' squads that have 'the power' to spy on anybody they want to, anytime they want to and by any means they want to... no actual crime committed or threat of committing any crime needed; These 'squads' have 'the power' to destroy any property they want to as long as they get 'the terrorist' (who posted something dissenting about GovCO somewhere) out of his/her home and into a GovCO cage somewhere

Because I didn't succumb to the whole covid1984 scheme and shouted everywhere I could about the scam, I became a wanted man; I've been attacked by the Policy Enforcers a few times now for one excuse or another; Have shut down their 'courts' and embarrassed 'magistrates' and 'prosecutors' as I walk out of their 'implied authority' courts a free, unencumbered man only to be informed that I am on a 'flagged' list which is just a polite way of saying "targeted individual' but they will not shut me up; Ever!

Expand full comment

Thanks to You SheThinksLiberty... You also have the ability to think critically and look outside the mass production theatre that is Poly Ticks to come to logical, well-reasoned conclusions

Trump is somewhat of a master when it comes to theatrics; He has been 'in the game' for a long time and whilst he plays his (Trump) cards close to his chest, he still lets his ego and arrogance over-ride his guard at times; His mouth and vocal cords often move faster than his brain; "I am the father of the vaccine, "take it, "its good, "I took it so go and get your shots"... Some of his hand signals give away his true allegiances too; Yes allegiances; He has no specific allegiance to the people of Constitutional America; Just like a hedge fund manager, he has bets placed everywhere; If one allegiance proves to be a bad choice, he will simply move his stack to another

Maxim at Law: One cannot serve Two masters

"Art of the Deal"...um...Yep! 100% on the money with that one Donny boy; You've been 'dealing' your whole damn life... all the way to become CEO of US.inc which is completely controlled and 85% occupied by the Jew; And now, despite all the promises you made to the People, you have selected many of Your Jew elitist friends to be part of 'Your Team'; I guess you do hold fast to at least some of your promises hey Don? Can't leave your backers hanging in the breeze or you will get no more soup!

I shouldn't be astounded by the gullibility of my fellow Aussies anymore; 'covid' seasoned I well for what to expect out of most Aussies but this whole "Trump is coming to save the world" thing being Promoted by many so-called 'awakened' Aussies does indeed Astound thy senses; There seems to be a never-ending amount of excuses being made for what the self-claimed Vax Daddy and his Military did, and continues to do to the worlds people

"Capital Punishment for antisemitism" "we must protect the freedom of our Jewish friends" "Israel is our greatest friend and ally" "I will defend Israel no matter the cost" "Israel has the right to defend itself" with many other "Israel and Jew" allegiances revealed and the best of all "God Bless Israel and God Bless America"... obviously putting Israel before America; The people of America are just an afterthought

How people cannot hear, listen and comprehend what Zion Don says astound I even more; MAGA Tards are a very special breed of Ignorance

Expand full comment

What do you think would have happened if he said “No one take the vaccine” consider All the angles & scenarios, from the public to the deep-state.

Expand full comment

"If" is a very big word...what do you think would of happened 'IF' the so-called 'vaccines' were never 'fast-tracked' under 'operation warp speed'

consider All the angles & scenarios, from the public to the deep-state.

Expand full comment

Trump was Commander-In-Chief at the time of the US DoD led World-Wide-Military-Campaign... He was/is the very top of Command Line Responsibility which makes him much more than Complicit in the many War Crimes committed

I don't know how to put this nicely; Wake the fark up!

Expand full comment

Maybe a bit troubling that we cannot give informed consent to a mosquito…and they are hardly accountable…!

I don’t know what exactly they can deliver but it would appear to be an away to circumvent our human rights…what say ye..?

Expand full comment

I'm wondering about this mosquito bizzo... More fear-mongering, like gain of function?

Expand full comment

In 2021, there was a Lawyer in Britain, Anna de Buisseret and a team of lawyers, worked hard to bring legal action against mandates on the basis that informed consent was being ignored. I have not followed up on her case.

http://www.radio4all.net/files/tony@cultureshop.org.uk/2149-1-Anna_de_Buisseret_Informed_Consent_Lawyer_Serves_Notice_On_Vaccinators.mp3

Expand full comment

Also see Anna De Buisseret's discussion with Ahmad Malik: https://docmalik.com/186-law-freedom/

Expand full comment

Sadly Anna de Buissera passed away Dec 2024. Such a tragic loss

Expand full comment

Yes indeed Angela, it is very sad that we have lost Anna De Buisseret.

Expand full comment

Thank you

Expand full comment

This content violated the terms and conditions of Odysee and has been filtered.

https://odysee.com/@Truth_will_set_You_Free:0/Anna-De-Buisseret-hb:4

Expand full comment

Everyone, please do not forget the other grave medical misdemeanor that was necessary to support the Vaxx agenda - the myth of no effective treatment, which required the fraudulent demonisation of hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin. Peter McCullough early on castigated the medical profession for what he correctly termed "therapeutic nihilism" with regard to Covid patients. Heroic individual doctors like Dr Zelenko in New York State, Dr. Chetty in South Africa, and Drs. Fareed and Tyson in California, saved many lives with protocols they devised using these and similar common drugs. But thousands of doctors stood by while patients suffered and died. The Vaxx agenda would have been impossible if governments and medical associations had promoted these simple, safe and effective treatments. Remember the fate of Clive Palmer's gift of hydroxychloroquine? The government destroyed it. In the USA the government locked up the huge American stockpile of hydroxychloroquine to prevent doctors getting access to it. In September 2021 the TGA actually banned the use of Ivermectin for Covid because of fears it would lead to so-called 'vaccine hesitancy'. This was an official agenda, to deny people access to these treatments in order to force them to get the vaxx. It is difficult to imagine anything more unethical. But the government and the medical profession collectively appear to have no understanding of the basic principles of medical ethics. They are power-mad. They disgraced themselves during Covid and there is no sign that they have any understanding to this day of the full horror of what they did.

Expand full comment

Stephen, do you think 'COVID-19' is a unique disease that responds to special treatment?

Or could hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin be useful for treatment of a range of respiratory ailments?

I'm just questioning if 'COVID-19', a name given to a group of common respiratory ailments*, need treatment different than that for other respiratory ailments?

* See: What exactly is 'COVID-19'? https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/what-exactly-is-covid-19

Expand full comment

💯 percent correct Elizabeth; "symptoms" of Convid 19, Fever, chills, sore throat. Reads like the cold & flu symptoms to me. Deadly novel virus, my backside. People, please STOP legitimising this farce, it gives the tyrants "vaccine" measures a continuous foothold, wakeup.

Expand full comment

Amen, and amen! Thank you, Stephen!

Expand full comment

And simple Vitamin D3 and zinc as per the late Dr Zelenko, for the inhibition of the range of single strand RNA viruses, such as coronaviruses and influenzas

Expand full comment

Wonderful job Elizabeth!

Expand full comment

Great podcast.

Re the woman who unfortunately ended up blind in both her eyes

''It's these practitioners that are acting agents for the state'' - Indeed they are - note that the state is willingly acting as agent for big pharma.

There we have the crux of the matter.

Government and business have merged.

Think of the TPP and the ISDS provisions it contained that provided the foundations for the merger of government and business - now they call this public private partnerships, the correct definition was frequently used to describe key players during WW2.

Expand full comment

It becomes crucial that everyone understands what ISDS is and how it is used to effectively neuter the government of the day.

So here's more about that in - The corporation invasion - http://mondediplo.com/2013/12/02tafta#nb2

If memory serves correct it all goes back to the Lewis Powell memo.

Big pharma ''threatened'' Algeria* to use the ISDS provisions because they were ''initially'' unwilling to cooperate with their agenda.

*Gravitas revealed that Pfizer threatened to sue a government unless they complied to their demands.

video Gravitas: Revealed: How Pfizer blackmails countries for shots https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYIJxoh7gq

Look upon these types of agreements as empire taking out insurance against a truly people friendly government.

One of the ways to get out of these sovereignty shredding ''agreements'' is for Australia to become a republic because everything, meaning all these so called agreements will then need to be renegotiated however it remains a dangerous ground as we will never really understand the true loyalties of the people that will be involved in this process until it is too late - At the same time we happen to have a government that's afraid to stand on it's own and fails to condemn these wars of aggression and Genocide to boot, in short a system like that isn't worth saving.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the links Finn.

I remember this from when I first read about the TPP years ago, and just couldn’t believe it could be true, ie:

QUOTE

The TTIP/TAFTA and the TPP would allow foreign companies to attack any signatory country whose policies impacted on their profits.

Companies would be able to demand compensation from countries whose health, financial, environmental and other public interest policies they thought to be undermining their interests, and take governments before extrajudicial tribunals. These tribunals, organised under World Bank and UN rules would have the power to order taxpayers to pay extensive compensation over legislation seen as undermining a company’s “expected future profits”.

END OF QUOTE

How can this be happening?!

It’s a coup!

Expand full comment

100%

It's happening because of the pivot to China, Australia was forced to sacrifice prosperity in exchange for insecurity, that's one reason why Rudd was disposed of and replaced by someone more willing to follow Washington's increasingly illogical narrative.

Ever see this short video? ''China debate: John Mearsheimer vs Hugh White (Aug 2019)- Mearsheimer was right about Australia.'' - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlrL15rU3ok

---

The revolving door between the corporate world and government, until finally they merge and become as one.

It was called the final phase of globalization, during the time Rudd was replaced by Gillard who didn't outright reject it, just the ISDS provisions it contained however in the end it was the Turnbull government that committed Australia to TPP - but that is to be expected from the former Australian CEO of Goldman Sachs.

If interested I have a link that will take you a page that displays many cases past and pending and the outcomes however it's no longer updated, perhaps they don't want us to know about these things. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/webdiaepcb2013d3_en.pdf

Edited for typo.

Expand full comment

“Australia was forced to sacrificed prosperity in exchange for insecurity”

?!?!?!

Expand full comment

We have neither prosperity nor security - due to being a US vassal state we have perpetual insecurity.

Expand full comment

Hi Elizabeth,

Very good presentation, thank you.

Do you really think everyone simply ‘forgot’ about informed consent? I don’t. I tried to tell people in Nov 21 it was illegal, but even ‘health freedom activists’ ignored me.

Such a shame, because had people been armed with THAT information 3 years ago, a lot of suffering could have been avoided. Which makes me wonder why they wouldn’t? Or why they hadn’t come to THAT conclusion themselves? The information was in plain english on the Federal AG’s website.

Not just doctors, but lawyers too and public servants, including the education department. All this highly paid, intelligent people that just ‘followed orders’? Isn’t that why they get the big money, because they are so much more erudite and learned than the rest of the ‘herd’?

Well, the covid psyop showed their true colours. They didn’t forget. They acted in self interest and greed. One thing that was missing from your presentation was the cash incentives offered to GPs for injecting this muck into people.

Every single person who went along with this should be in gaol awaiting trial for murder. Didn’t know does not wash.

Bill Gates said in 2022, “by 2025, doctors will be no more important to society than car mechanics”. At the time, I assumed this was because of tele-consultations and such. Actually, it will be the doctors own fault. The wages of conspiring with the ‘devil’.

Why would anybody trust anybody who was/still is promoting this lie? Seriously?

Blessings,

Janey

https://janeylovesfreedom.substack.com/p/warning-to-queensland-business-caveat

Expand full comment

Janey, re "Do you really think everyone simply ‘forgot’ about informed consent?"

Well, what did happen Janey...?

Throughout 2020 and 2021, 'they' were determined to get everyone vaccinated, certainly in Australia. I wrote many emails calling for informed consent, and as you'll see in the presentation, I and my colleague Emma McArthur received letters from the Australian Government in December 2021 and November 2022 which confirmed informed consent should be obtained. And I received a similar letter from AHPRA in September 2021. And yet at the very same time coercion and mandates were in place...

So what was going on?

Expand full comment

It sounds like they went totally rogue, and need to be held accountable.

Every single one of them.

Blessings,

Janey

Expand full comment
Jan 7Edited

Vaccination is definitely political and there really is no way that anyone can say they were able to give “informed consent“. In terms of this last “pandemic“ with the rollout of the experimental injections, everything about both the “pandemic” and the experimental injection was misinformation, disinformation, or simply outright lies. The best we can say is that the experimental injections were minimally tested, in a very limited sense, with no meaningful data that could be obtained from them. And yet they quickly became mandatory - which ironically removes the very concept of consent completely. I would offer that the same thing holds for any vaccine. In all my experience of being urged to take a variety of vaccines, whoever was trying to get me to take one never provided any kind of background information or data to say that ohh yeah, this is “highly effective“ and we define “highly effective“ in the following manner.

It is all coercive when it comes to “vaccines” in general

Expand full comment

Re: "And yet they quickly became mandatory - which ironically removes the very concept of consent completely."

Exactly!

Mind-boggling that medical interventions could be imposed in a supposed 'free country', under threat of losing livelihood and participation in society.

Expand full comment

Absolutely correct. And since they got away with it this time they will do it again. Only when they do it again it’s gonna be a lot worse.. for us

Expand full comment

Who says they got away with it this time?

I, for one, am seeking accountability.

Expand full comment

So am I, demanding accountability. Unfortunately, we’re not gonna get it. We can thank the unparty for that.

Expand full comment

no package inserts: even if they would have, practitioners couldn't provide the possibilty for informed consent.

prime directive: do no harm. yet within one week (march 11-17th 2020) in the UK protocols for and expertise in public health were replaced by military biodefence regulations: "...we're at war!" (Boris Johnson) - https://dailysceptic.org/2024/07/07/it-was-biodefence-not-public-health-u-k-edition/

Expand full comment

If it was about our health why remove the health department and replace it with the military? That’s when the coin dropped in my had! 🙌👍

Expand full comment

exactly

[NB typo: 'had' = head] ;-))

Expand full comment

Thank you for this brilliant presentation! It's kind of frustrating when the criminals who perpetrated this crime have the legal system on their side. We have all the evidens to win if there still were law and order. The magnitude of the covid crime is unfathomable, and I get so upset hearing for instance Gerry Waters story.

Expand full comment

And there's Bill Gates still walking around free imposing his tyranny on the rest of us.

How do we bring this guy to account?

Expand full comment

In about 10 days we have a pivotal moment when RFK hopefully takes control over all the corrupt health agencies. Bill Gates and Fauci are the first two criminals he will go after, - just look at the title of his book. My intuition tells me that everything is about to be turned around (despite your lack of trust in Trump :-)

Expand full comment

Yes, "informed consent and ethics was always the key"...

But they were trashed...

I pleaded for informed consent, see for example this email from June 2021, and check out the cc's too...

Coercive covid-19 injections in Australia - email to the Medical Board of Australia,

AHPRA, RACGP, RACP, AMA: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/coercive-covid-19-injections-in-australia-medical-board-of-australia-ahpra-racgp-racp-ama.pdf

Expand full comment

Ditto.

I was denied informed consent. The coercive mandates meant I was simply unable to give free and informed consent. Any consent I could have given would always be tainted by the coercive threats imposed on me.

Expand full comment

Re “coercive threats”…

Seriously!!!!!

How could this happen in a supposed ‘free country’ such as Australia?

Governments demanded that people submit to medical interventions on demand, led by people such as Daniel Andrews and Mark McGowan.

People were threatened with losing their livelihood and participation in society if they refused to comply - ‘No Jab, No Job’ to ‘No Jab, No Life’.

And the medical profession went along with this, and practitioners penetrated people who were under duress with needles and the contents.

What were these people thinking?!?!

Mind-boggling!!!!

Expand full comment

Do it or get sacked. I was sacked. I had colleagues who were sacked even though they exclusively worked from home. Make it make sense.

I think the majority of medical professionals did not do their own research. They simply trusted authorities. Why would the PM or Premier lie to me? When they google your symptoms and WebMD or John Hopkins says you have X and it should be treated with Y they believe you have X and should be treated with Y. When their professional body or the Health department says "safe and effective" they believe "safe and effective". I would wager that most medical professionals have never read a single study from start to finish. They are too time poor to do their own research and probably have no inclination to do so because churning through customers to increase their billables is a higher priority. A great many were probably also convinced by the 'greater good' argument that is always behind any 'public health' measures that involve individualised risks and socialised perceived benefits.

Expand full comment

Thank you Elizabeth,

It was wonderful to hear such a master class in presenting clear and convincing argument supported by excellent slides!

May I raise a legal aspect. I am not a lawyer. Nevertheless, I think a critical feature of any successful legal case is the presentation of a legal point for the court to consider.

a) Your point is that medical practitioners had to follow guidance to ensure valid consent (Charles’ distinction between informed and valid consent was useful). I’m not sure whether this is a legal requirement, or just a guideline that could be outside of a court’s jurisdiction?

b) One of the questioners thought that the first ‘crime’ to be challenged was the lie of covid pathogenicity. But was it actually illegal to lie?

c) Perhaps people planning legal action in Australia could also consider another legal avenue. This is false advertising of a pharmaceutical (I imagine it's possible that other jurisdictions, such as in Ireland, may have similar legislation):

... from my understanding, the Australian Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 is contravened if a person advertises a 'biological' (such as a genetic covid injection) that is 'included in the Register' (these injections were included), for an indication (such as preventing transmission) that is not accepted.

See https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A03952/latest/text

Section 32BL 'Civil penalty for advertising biological for an indication'

A person contravenes this section if:

(a) the person, by any means, advertises a biological for an indication; and

(b) the biological is included in the Register; and

(c) the indication is not an indication accepted in relation to that inclusion.

I feel a court may find that this Act was contravened by people such as politicians, health officers, reporters, and medical practitioners who advocated the injections for the use of preventing transmission. This is because the TGA in its public assessment report (PAR) for each of three therapeutic goods reported that they were not designed, or tested, for the use of preventing transmission, and were not approved for that use.

By the way, though I’m pushing a legal point, I’m not at all suggesting that if the injections HAD been approved for preventing transmission, that government behaviour would have been principled or morally acceptable. In a liberal democracy we have a duty to do no harm, but it is up to each of us to decide HOW we achieve that. Some chose to achieve this by attaining natural immunity, for example, and others kept away from vulnerable people as one usually does for colds and flus. Also, as you mentioned, the harm from covid was not serious. This was especially so since there were remedies available to vulnerable people such as supplemented vitamin D3 and Zinc that the late Dr Zelenko told us would disrupt any single-stranded RNA virus such as coronaviruses and influenzas.

Thank you for pushing forward!

Expand full comment

Ralph, thank you very much for your thoughtful response.

Re informed consent - I include references to this in the presentation of course, but see for instance The Australian Immunisation Handbook re Valid consent: https://immunisationhandbook.health.gov.au/contents/vaccination-procedures/preparing-for-vaccination#valid-consent

Consider:

QUOTE:

Valid consent is the voluntary agreement by an individual to a proposed procedure, which is given after sufficient, appropriate and reliable information about the procedure, including the potential risks and benefits, has been conveyed to that individual.8-12

END OF QUOTE

You can see there are references given, but these are not easy to access online, and they also look very broad, not honing on the specific evidence.

Also consider this section:

QUOTE

For consent to be legally valid, the following elements must be present:12,14

It must be given by a person with legal capacity, and of sufficient intellectual capacity to understand the implications of receiving a vaccine.

It must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation.

It must cover the specific procedure that is to be performed.

It can only be given after the potential risks and benefits of the relevant vaccine, the risks of not having it, and any alternative options have been explained to the person.

END OF QUOTE.

So specifically there, I'm focussing on "It must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation", and "It can only be given after the potential risks and benefits of the relevant vaccine, the risks of not having it, and any alternative options have been explained to the person."

Looks pretty clear to me that government mandates corrupt this advice.

Also, re was it illegal to lie about 'Covid' - well, doesn't this amount to fraud? If people are being terrorised by a so-called threat to submit to a medical intervention they don't need and which apparently 'doesn't work', and could be harmful, isn't this at least fraud?

Re your suggestion about false advertising of a pharmaceutical, this indeed does look a very interesting approach to look into...

Expand full comment

Hi Elizabeth,

I’m sorry for my delay in replying.

As I say, I am not a lawyer.

Nevertheless, over the past 4 or so years many have had an accelerated class in legal processes, as well as in immunology and vaccinology, in the role of regulators and the entities they are supposed to regulate, and in the psychological conditions under which so many humans conformed to absurd directions from authorities.

Even so, after just a few moments of thought on the legal processes I realised that I had quickly run aground. So, hopefully a proper lawyer may correct the following.

Let me just lay out what I gather are the basics. As we've all been noticing, ordinary citizens can only make civil claims for damages. Criminal cases must be brought by the state, or the crown. Usually, criminal cases can begin with a citizen reporting an alleged crime to the police who may take it to a magistrate who will issue search warrants for further investigation if they consider there are sufficient grounds. This has been rare in relation to the covid response, so far I have noticed only one that has got as far as issued search warrants.

An example of illegal behaviour that can lead to either criminal or civil consequences is fraud. The state may bring criminal charges for fraud, and conviction is achieved if the prosecution can prove its case 'beyond reasonable doubt'. In a civil case, my understanding is that the plaintiff has the burden only to prove that it is more likely than not that the defendant acted illegally and caused damage to the plaintiff.

But fraud is quite different from simple lying. Fraud can be thought of as a deception intended to deprive another person of property or to induce them to surrender a right. The plaintiff must prove (on balance) that the defendant had the required intention to deprive or to induce, and that the plaintiff relied on that deception, and suffered quantifiable damage as a result. There is a lot to prove here, and there are lots of defences. Even if the defendant had a duty, such as a duty of care, to provide accurate information the defendant may claim that they acted in good faith, or that they owed an even higher duty.

The question of 'standing' is relevant. To be heard in court in the USA, a plaintiff who is trying to expose illegal actions of corporations or governments must demonstrate that they, the plaintiff, suffered a “concrete” and “particularized” injury that is “traceable” to the defendant’s action and that can be “redressed” by a favourable decision (quoted from https://www.publicjustice.net/what-we-do/access-to-justice/standing-doctrine/). In Australia, a plaintiff trying to enforce a public right must be directly affected by an illegal action, or have a special interest and be acting on behalf of people directly affected. (See https://lawright.org.au/legal-information/going-to-court/standing-and-involvement-in-legal-proceedings/)

We have seen unsuccessful cases brought in which general claims have been advanced of unfair, unprincipled, and immoral behaviour, but did not seem to include a clearly identifiable legal point. Also, they have seemed to try to aim at an entire governance system. But very few people are awake enough, or have the grasp, to see that an entire system as corrupt. People are mostly conformists who may be able stomach only that one or two have gone rogue and must be dealt with. (I have mentioned this in https://homocomfortus.substack.com/p/we-are-in-a-battle.) So we must target isolated individuals.

Successful cases sometimes look like this:

1. There are named targets of the legal action that include: a) an individual person who is alleged to have committed an illegal act; b) also named is their superior who was responsible for authorising the act; and c) also named is the organisation they work for (that's where the money is).

2. Evidence is provided for each of multiple examples of the alleged illegal act. For example in Monica Smit's case, three different arrests were identified.

3. For each example, the plaintiff presents a precise article in the legislation to the court with evidence that the example breached that article. References to previous cases are made to support a desired decision. AND in addition, for each example, one or two or more alternative articles of legislation that may also have been breached are alleged. These are backups in case the top claim fails. So, here one could have, not sure of the order: i) false advertising of a pharmaceutical - ii) fraudulent claims such as that the injections would prevent the spread that were relied on and that resulted in harm to the plaintiff - iii) failure of duty of care by named individual practitioners in requiring valid consent - iv) others?

All the best, Ralph

Expand full comment

It is feudalism for the people to shield elites from the consequences of their own actions and circumstances. We all have to take our medicine. Time for the biggest debt jubilee in world history in order for working people to avoid more misery, as opposed to the Obama era crimes of bail outs for the corrupt, and an end to the war based economy with government money printing at will.

Expand full comment

Thank you! I look forward to listening to this.

Expand full comment

Yes of course, thank you Elizabeth for continuing to shine the light. The whole point was to use fear to mass coerce the global population into submission for such things as - quarantine camps (concentration camps); vaccine passports; digital currencies; global ID tracking system using the vaccine programme, compulsory vaccines; restrictions on travel if you were not up-to-date with the compulsory vaccine schedule and other dystopian and totalitarian and dictatorship agendas. Satan's face. The Greek Monk and Elder Paisios (now reposed) warned decades ago about the upcoming Mark of the Beast, forced vaccines, Zionism, controlling people's behaviour; people could not participate in society e.g. within businesses or with general purchases without the Mark of the Beast.

Expand full comment

Certainly incredible things have happened Tania.

Astonishing to see how our freedoms were trashed by 'our' governments...

Expand full comment

.

My favorite parts of Covid:

#34

Finally The Hunger Games is down to a showdown between two teams:

The UnVaccinated

vs.

Those I like to call:

Spent Pieces Of Used Pharma Trash

.

Expand full comment

It's a pretty grim story Thomas!

Expand full comment

.

My favorite parts of Covid:

#41

The entire charade is no more than Electron Microscopy For Dummies:

Spoiler Alert:

You’ve seen one Bacteria Microphage you’ve seen them all.

.

Expand full comment

It depends upon what team you’re on.

Expand full comment

.

My favorite parts of Covid:

#42

All I see are people that gave up on themselves and forfeited their minds.

.

Expand full comment