“As a health professional, I cannot comment on vaccine mandates.”
I would argue that this statement alone, if used in a clinical setting, could nullify lawful consent because the practitioner is acknowledging the presence of coercion ….
This sentence is gold... "As a health professional, I cannot comment on vaccine mandates."
As you argue "...this statement alone, if used in a clinical setting, could nullify lawful consent because the practitioner is acknowledging the presence of coercion..."
There is so much in that fact sheet for vaccination providers which is incredible to think about...
It seems to me that Australian Government Operation COVID Shield fact sheet, published in December 2021, is a panicked reaction to your letter to then Health Minister Greg Hunt, sent in November 2021, in which you ask "Please could you advise to what extent the Commonwealth Covid-19 vaccine claims scheme provides insurance and indemnity for the civil and criminal liability that would arise where battery and clinical negligence occur due to a failure to obtain valid consent?" https://humanityattheprecipice.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/11-november-2022-covid-19-vaccine-claims-scheme.pdf
What I want to know is how much each Doctor was paid by Big Pharma per Covid vaccine injection - my understanding is that it was $250 per head vaccinated. The other thing I want to know is where the money came from to pay that $250, spent millions of times over - but I'll call it "Black Money" and was Income Tax ever paid on it.
There are Doctors who respond here - so how much were you paid for each GMO vaccine you injected?
Everyone vaccinated has been vaccinated with a Gene Therapy Injection which changed their Genetic Makeup within 6 hours of vaccination, according to published studies and they are all legally cDNA vaccinated: Dr. Peter Kotlár, a Slovak physician, government commissioner, and MP drops bombshell investigation into DNA Contamination. The vaccinated are now officially GMO!!
"I’m not afraid to say officially— a genetically modified organism.
" Robert Kennedy Jr, Pam Bondi and Kash Patel has also been informed.
Moderna's Covid-19 virus formula Patented 2013 - #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG
The US Supreme Court 2013 ruled that only cDNA (Synthetic DNA) is patentable. Isolated, natural DNA is not patentable, but in a nutshell, biotechnology companies can own living things if said things are genetically-modified and not naturally occurring - that means that The Department Of Defense (and others) can literally own a human being if this synthetic code is taken up into your Genome, which a Swedish Company observed to occur within 6 hours from Covid-19 Gene Therapy "vaccines" Injections.
Dr Madej wrote The synthetic mRNA of Pfizer and Moderna, along with the viral vector DNA delivery systems of Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca, change your "genetic code" making you genetically modified, but Moderna Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks tells you straight up that 1) The shots change your genetic code. 2) The shots do not stop the spread of Covid-19. 3) Tal Zaks says the Moderna shot is "hacking the software of life" and that Carbon Particles and Viral Vectors do the same thing. A vaccinated person is now legally, a "Trans Human" -
A Trans Human is a new species which never existed before and by Law, they have Zero Human rights, because they are no longer Human and thus, because no Rights have ever been written into Law for them, they now have Zero rights - but much like the American Slaves up to 1865, when President Lincoln wrote into Law, Rights for them.
Gene Therapy is not reversable, but now described as a forced medical treatment, which Biontech/Pfizer said "should have been licensed as a Gene Therapy Injection (2015)" and which "Targets the Dentric Cells in the Lymph Nodes (2023)" - but why?
Thomas Renz, Lawyer, identified the vaccines as being ModRNA and not mRNA
Dr Francis Boyle, the Harvard educated Law Professor who drafted the Biological Weapons and Antiterrorism Act of 1989, provided an Affidavit that Covid-19 mRNA injections are Biological Weapons and Weapons of Mass Destruction.
Dr Boyle stated that the Covid-19 injections violate Biological Weapons 18 USC 175 and Weapons and Firearms 790.166 Fla. Stat (2023).
Not one person gave valid or informed consent because they were not given all the facts about what's in it. They were told it was a vaccine but just because they changed the dictionary definition doesnt make it a vaccine if there wasn't a worldwide consensus on what the new meaning of the word now means. I can't just go and change a definition and expect everyone to know what I mean. Has anyone ever found out who changed all the online definitions? Was it the WHO that gave the order aka Bill Gates?
And the question is Sonja...what exactly is a 'vaccine'?
There's a lot to question now, including the entire ever-increasing 'womb to tomb' taxpayer-funded vaccination schedule, which is mired in conflicts of interest.
I think we all thought we knew what a vaccine was from the decades of propaganda and trusting doctors however I don't think anyone knows anymore wtf is going on with vaccines and what they truly are! However all I know is they are poison and toxic making most people ill.
The Vaccine Inside the Race to Conquer the COVID-19 Pandemic
by Joe Miller (Author), Özlem Türeci (Author), Ugur Sahin (Author)
In this book Ugur Sahin published that he thought his vaccines should have been called "Gene Therapy Injections" and that they target the Dentifrice Cells in the Lymph Nodes. though why, I have absolutely no idea - so they were never vaccines, although that is what they were sold as.
1.3% efficient for the AstraZeneca–Oxford, 1.2% for the Moderna–NIH, 1.2% for the J&J, 0.93% for the Gamaleya, and 0.84% for the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccines.
ARR vs RRR - I knew I had an explanation somewhere - the vaccinated have been fooled
Ugur Sahin Co-founder and CEO of BioNTech refuses to take the mRNA Covid vaccine because he says, “we need to ensure functionality of our whole company”
Ugur Sahin refuses to take the jab because he says he must ensure he stays "functional," in other words, he knows that the clot shot renders humans functionless, incapacitated, and seriously injured where they cannot do their job, take care of themselves, or function for their children anymore - change them into GMO's or kill them. By S.D. Wells // Jan 08, 2025
Seriously, would you have been vaccinated, if you knew how ineffective the vaccines were against Covid - with Pfizer Less Than 1% and the rest not much better?
The US Supreme Court Ruling 2013 with World Wide Applications was the issue here:
The US Supreme Court 2013 ruled that only cDNA (Synthetic DNA) is patentable. Isolated, natural DNA is not patentable, but in a nutshell, biotechnology companies can own living things if said things are genetically-modified and not naturally occurring - that means that The Department Of Defense (and others) can literally own a human being if this synthetic code is taken up into your Genome, which a Swedish Company observed to occur within 6 hours from Covid-19 Gene Therapy "vaccines" Injections.
Dr Madej wrote The synthetic mRNA of Pfizer and Moderna, along with the viral vector DNA delivery systems of Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca, change your "genetic code" making you genetically modified, but Moderna Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks tells you straight up that 1) The shots change your genetic code. 2) The shots do not stop the spread of Covid-19. 3) Tal Zaks says the Moderna shot is "hacking the software of life" and that Carbon Particles and Viral Vectors do the same thing. A vaccinated person is now legally, a "Trans Human" -
In other words, naturally occurring mRNA could not be patented, but cDNA ModRNA DNA could be because it was made in a laboratory and is synthetic ModRNA (mRNA), which is why all of the "Gene Therapy Injections" are patented and this was brought home in a recent European Ruling against BionTech for Pfizer who were found to have pirated Moderna's Covid-19 vaccine Patent, meaning that Moderna created the Covid-19 virus: The Expose, back in 2019 published that DARPA Scientists were bragging on Twitter that they had made the Covid-19 virus with Moderna - which Moderna went on to Patent in 2013: From that patent for Moderna's Covid-19 virus: #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG
May 17 2024 (Reuters) - Moderna (MRNA.O) said on Friday the European Patent Office had upheld the validity of one of the company's key patents #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG , a win in an ongoing COVID-19 vaccine dispute with Pfizer (PFE.N) and BioNTech (22UAy.DE)
The company has been locked in a legal battle with Pfizer-BioNTech over their COVID shot Comirnaty after suing them in 2022 for allegedly copying its mRNA technology, but presumably #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG.
Pfizer and BioNTech have countersued, alleging that Moderna's patent is invalid, after the companies' rival vaccines generated billions in revenues during the pandemic.
Pfizer said it was disappointed and would consider all legal options and may appeal the decision.
"Irrespective of the outcome of this legal matter, we will continue to manufacture and supply the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine," Pfizer said in a statement to Reuters.
BioNTech said the patent office's decision to maintain Moderna's European patent #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG "does not change our unwavering and unequivocal stance that this patent is invalid."
BUT it is the back story, which nobody has considered and that is - this is the time of The Great Reset, when total Human Population was to be reduced from 8.5 Billion in 2019 to either 500 Million or 50,000 - AND THAT HAS BEEN ACHIEVED because only a small number of people refused the Gene Therapy Injections and have remained Human - the rest are now Gene Therapy Injected Genetically Modified Organisms or GMO's their bodies owned by the Military - but not their Spirit or Soul, which "might" be in temporary residence now - but we will have to wait and see how the GMO's are disposed of - Bill Gates style.
As I said, elsewhere on your substack - our Politicians took "lobbying" or bribes from Big Pharma in the $Millions or Hundreds of Thousands to vote the way that Big Pharma wanted them to, which essentially means that the politicians you voted into Cabinet to look after you, filled their pockets with the money they were given, to get you all vaccinated - and it was the intention of the political power in place at the time, to put into place misinformation or disinformation bills, so that they could get away, unscathed, with what they had done and each time you have an Inquiry into the Covid vaccines, it never goes anywhere, because these same people are covering their backs and avoiding being found out.
If you have any politicians living in your vicinity, go see if they have improved their lot, new home, new posh areas, fancy cars, things which show that financially they have considerably more wealth than they started with, which they could not have got from their ministerial pay alone.
You say: "our Politicians took "lobbying" or bribes from Big Pharma in the $Millions or Hundreds of Thousands to vote the way that Big Pharma wanted them to..."
People making those sorts of accusations should provide evidence.
Bill Rice was able to provide evidence for America, but I don't have a clue how to find out how much Australians got paid or how to go about it - I'm guessing that your man Dutton got paid nothing in opposition, why not write to him and ask him, he might know the answer to your question?
No, signing a form without providing authentic voluntary informed consent, and being coerced and mandated to submit to vaccination, is NOT valid consent.
You are arguing a point of view which really does not matter now, because once vaccinated, the results of that vaccine cannot be reversed and whatever the vaccinated have now become, but GMO's, is what they are and it is what they have to live with in future - but - Human Laws do not include GMO's in their makeup and GMO's are now, by Human Law, Trans Humans, a new species with zero Rights of any kind and in fact, according to Christine.257's substack, when Thomas Renz and others took the vaccine makers to the Geneva convention for Crimes Against Humanity back in 2020/21 ALL of there cases were thrown out and none proceeded to Trial - conclusion, GMO's don't have any Rights, but are just like Chicken.
Once genetically modified, there is no way back, irrespective of how that modification took place - it simply does not matter.
Then, what is consent, or not, is of no consequence, when the final result is all that matters and will be dealt with accordingly, presumably.
Hey folks, anything under EUA, you don't have to consent to take it. You CAN refuse. The corrupt 3-letter agencies made it so as to appear to STOOPID UHMERUKUNZ that they actually had the legislative, judicial and enforcement powers, as if a mandate is a real law, and got the private CORPORATIONS to force their employees into a "prisoners' dilemma" and be forcibly injected with the toxic bullshit.
I don't suppose anyone has given valid consent for vaccines ever. They were not told 'By the way this contains the disease causing agent and various toxic substances, are you happy with this?'
No one ever told me when I had a BCG ivax at age 15 or when I had a tetanus around 30 years old.
Canada had the same tyrannical procedure in effect. Although I am retired, so wasn't threatened with job loss, all the other penalties were inflicted upon me and I was the pariah exemplified by Trudeau. I lost 2 years of playing in my orchestra, not even allowed to hear them play; no gym time in the winter, no travel, etc. After Canada had loosened its mandates, I was to sing in Carnegie Hall; paid my $1,000 deposit, but lost it when NY required the jab to fly. And still the boosters are being pushed, and children are at risk.
I had a similar experience in South Australia, Pete.
I'm retired too, so the job mandates didn't get me, but I was excluded from participation in society we usually take for granted - going to the cinema and theatre; going to the gym and golf; going to galleries and museums, etc. Other states were more severe, even excluding people from retail shopping and hairdressing; and hospitality such as restaurants, bars, pubs, hotels, cafes etc.
It was No Jab, No Life... Punishment for refusing to comply with illegitimate 'orders'.
Wow...this happened in our supposed 'free countries', this blatant discrimination against critical thinking people who refused to sacrifice their bodily autonomy on the government's demand.
So many people collaborated with this ostracism, splitting families and friendships.
And all for a phoney baloney 'Covid crisis', which was deliberately manufactured to fleece the people, and set them up to be enslaved in a social credit system.
My presumption is this: You are a GMO, a Genetically Modified Organism, your body owned by the Armed Forces of your Country, to do with as they please, because you are no longer Human and now, after Genetic Modifying Injections, (vaccines) you have Zero Human Rights and your Spirit is in temporary residence accordingly. Bill Gates owns the patents to make you into a GMO Robot, so presumably, do your Armed Forces. I prefer to remain Human with all of my Human Rights intact. What does this mean for you in future - I have absolutely no idea, but sooner you than me. It was, after all, a matter of personal choice. You volunteered to be GMO vaccinated. I refused, under Australian Common Law, Section 51, of the Legal Code. Things are never done without purpose, it remains to be seen what that GMO purpose is.
Can you please provide a link to Section 51 of the Legal Code of Australian Common Law re: refusing a “vaccine”. What you’ve written is simple, but I’m unable to find where Section 51 may be used to legally refuse “vaccines”.
You don’t read articles or people’s comments correctly Christine/richard. You need to do this before you make your nonsensical comments.
You are simply not qualified to “judge” others, and you randomly announce what other people have done, or become, in your opinion. Presume nothing.
If you keep doing this, someone will have you in court for libel.
And you won’t have any Human Rights intact if you get hoodwinked into getting onboard the digital ID, which is not a simple digital ID, it’s a biometric ID. From what I’ve heard-not confirmed though-it will be an or both iris scan.
Now if someone hacks into our digital biometric ID, and uses it to commit a crime, how can we prove we didn’t commit the crime? We obviously can’t swap our eyeballs around!
Me, too. I'm in California. The auditorium where our orchestra performs is under the auspices of the county government. They were forbidding any un-" vaccinated" person from entering any city, county, state or federally-controlled building without proof of quackcination.. I was out for a year. Then the Players' Committee at Santa Rosa Symphony told their admin that they had to let their unvaxxed players back to work, OR ELSE, and that's when things began to change in the Bay Area, Ground Zero in heavily chem-sprayed California, for the Plandemic. The A.F. of M. took a very pro-vax stance. I would at least like to have them compensate me for the missed pension contributions for the time and remuneration that our lying, conniving sycophantic government stole from us.
I'm in the UK, where we currently have zero free speech and people being arrested for "non crime incidents".
So I hope that when people see my redactions they understand the sentiment and fill in the blanks, without actually seeing the pesky words that "Starmers Stasi" are so very keen to police.
The end result is all that matters - the vaccines "Gene Therapy Injections" cannot be reversed and the vaccinated are all now GMO's "Genetically Modified Organisms" in keeping with Bill Gates desire to reduce Humans to 50,000 or 500 Million and that has now been achieved, the final numbers, anyone's guess, since those in the know are not telling. It is a bit like going to sleep White and waking up Black - or vice versa - it is how it is and now the GMO's have zero Human Rights, because zero Rights were ever written into Law for GMO's, so they have the same Rights, legally, as the Black Slaves prior to 1865, so that, theoretically, they cannot comment on Human matters which no longer apply to them, either, because, well, they have the same Rights as Chicken.
The problem i have is that if mRNA is natural to all things on this planet and the key to Heaven, by identifying the dead according to their genetic makeup, or call sign, mRNA - then what door does the synthetic ModRNA DNA patented Gene Therapy Modified "Genetically Modified Organisms" open after death, instead - with all Catholics ordered to be vaccinated by your spiritual leader, the Pope himself, but vaccinated like him?
A heads up only, to consider and hope for the best, but death, something none of us can avoid, sooner or later.
If you believe in God the Father, God the Son, and The Holy Spirit, and lead your life accordingly, then God’s Judgement may be the outcome you aim for.
I in no way approve of the pope. Obviously I am not catholic.
There is much more than messenger RNA to be considered for entry to Heaven. Hoping “for the best” is useless at best.
If you richard, would like to know more about this, DM me.
There was a parallel situation when people argued that lockdowns were an infringement of human rights - including the right to freedom of movement and freedom of assembly. We were told most emphatically by the Victorian premier and his henchpersons - the tone was extremely overbearing, if not threatening - and I quote - "This is not a matter of human rights". Really??? The unspoken assumption is that human rights are given and can be taken away by the government. If nothing else, this shows that the rhetoric of human rights carries no weight with the authorities in Australia, except when it happens to have implications that suit their own agenda.
Well done Elizabeth! They could just as easily have a government goon with a revolver standing on one side of the victim and the nurse on the other. The goon would say "Consent to the jab or get a bullet in the head from my gun". And then the nurse would ask "Do you consent to this injection?"
Australians should be in no doubt that they are now - curently - living under a vile dictatorship that holds them in utter contempt. None of this has gone away. They are now building the digital prison from which there will be no escape. Believe me, I have intimate knowledge of the 'public service' mentality in this country. There is an increasingly vast unelected bureaucracy - correctly termed the 'administrative state' - which controls the government and is responsible for documents such as the one you have revealed here. The mindset is truly totalitarian. These people really do believe that the public are morons who need to be told what to do and how to live. I mean this literally. This is not an exaggeration. We are in a very dangerous situation in my view. The governments of Australia - state and federal - showed their fangs during the 'pandemic'. But nothing has been done to mitigate the threat. The same people, with the same power, are still running the country.
Re: "They could just as easily have a government goon with a revolver standing on one side of the victim and the nurse on the other. The goon would say "Consent to the jab or get a bullet in the head from my gun". And then the nurse would ask "Do you consent to this injection?"
I would really like to get a cartoon of this scenario - not 'the bullet in the head', but rather the threat of losing livelihood and participation in society - which is a pretty dire threat!
Thank you Elizabeth. "Get vaccinated or get penalised" is correct. Although I can`t help thinking that "Operation COVID Shield" is also misleading with it`s statements. For consent to be legally valid, the following elements must be present:
"It must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue PRESSURE, COERCION or MANIPULATION" and, the potential risks, benefits and options have been explained,
"Operation Covid Shield" does not seem to consider this element of coercion when they make their statements. Simply saying yes under coercion is not valid consent. The only way anyone would know their statements are misleading, is by reading the fine print down the bottom which refers to the "Australian Immunisation Handbook.
Agree Peter, there is much to take apart in the Operation COVID Shield fact sheet.
In the first instance, I just wanted to share it in its entirety, so people can see the 'information for vaccination providers' published by the Australian Government, and make their own judgements.
I've been investigating vaccination policy and practice over the last 16 years.
When I first started, with pet vaccination, I had no particular antagonism against vaccination generally, hadn't thought much about it, and was particularly focussed on the over-use of vaccine products.
But now...after 16 years...I'm questioning ALL the vaccine products, multi-component shots, revaccinations. They must all be subject to the spotlight, including the conflicts of interest which surround vaccination schedules.
What is the hardest is to be able to be objective about the paradigm you grew up in, and realize where and how it lies to us. On one level Thomas Kuhn is a great guide. On another level, spiritual work is helpful, but it remains different to break out of the paradigm. Of course in our covid experience, we can be ever so grateful for the likes of Denis Rancourt, and Mike Yeadon, (and others) who have shown us the courage to trust their own eyes, and extricate themselves from the indoctrination that would say our eyes are lying to us…
At times, I try a thought experiment of having a group of Papua cannibalistic tribesmen watching us on television and laughing their asses off about the cult that is our western culture, complete with the Stockholm syndrome about our “healthcare system.” It is truly too absurd, especially here in America, if we’ve known for so long now that iatrogenic disease is the 3rd leading cause of death, and no doubt, taking the vaxx into account, it is now the first leading cause of death, And then we pay double or more than anyone in any other part of the world.
I asked my father, a vaxx-sceptic MD (psychiatrist), at age 8 or so, why it was that the kids who got all their vaccinations were sick all the time, and sixty years later, Dr Paul Thomas delivered the proof on a silver platter. In short, I find myself now at the point that the whole vaccination schedule is a case of ritual abuse, to indoctrinate people in a way of understanding their own health to the benefit of the providers, and the annual physical, is just a (almost) mandatory Tupperware party for big pharma. It almost gets funny if it weren’t so tragic, especially when you see how people you love and care for are so completely blinded with the indoctrination.
However, we are in the throes of a deep change, and some of that gives me some hope. At least some people are starting to wake up.
In the USA, the con-vid quackzines were a special kind of crazy.
They are still to this day called "countermeasures" as if there was some bio weapon. The only bio weapon is the psychological operation, but here's the latest sociopathic court decision. Apparently, informed consent doesn't apply to martial law type bullshit. Beautiful disaster...
Rob, in Australia, we have confirmation from the Australian Government that 'informed consent should be obtained'...in December 2021 and November 2022.
I have shared this information over and over again...
But, strangely, people in the so-called 'freedom movement' that has sprung up in 'Covid' times don't seem to be interested in this information...it's bizarre!
Suppose a bushranger rides up to your stage coach brandishing a revolver and says "Your money or your life". Having weighed the pros and cons, you decide to hand over the money. According to the Australian Government, you have just given your "voluntary informed consent" to the transaction! The mind boggles.
Vials of the COVID-19 vaccine are seen at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Md., Dec. 14, 2020.
Lawyer Tom Renz has exposed that the COVID-19 vaccines, widely advertised as mRNA (messenger RNA) vaccines, are in fact lab-created hybrids known as modRNA.
Mandatory vaccination is illegal under Australian Law and would be subject to Legal Proceedings under Common Law against Section 51 of the Legal Code.
The Constitution prohibits any form of compulsion, which would subject citizens to medical or pharmaceutical services, including mandatory vaccination. They should remain free to decide whether they wish to receive certain medical treatments, including vaccination and they should not be disadvantaged by any government on the ground of their own voluntary decisions.
A friend went into hospital with a broken heel. I provided the above which she gave to the nursing staff. They ran for cover and not one person came near her, except for her heel treatment while she was in hospital for about 10 days and she ordered the above was kept on her file, should she need to go to hospital, ever again.
I carry the above in my wallet all of the time. If I am challenged, I pass a copy to the person giving me a hard time. The results are always satisfying, to say the least.
There is a Section 51 Government Department in the major city near you and they have a form for you to complete and then they will pursue anyone who has defaulted, in the above Law and against you, but on your behalf.
I'm not too sure how the Section 51 staff would handle it though, since they are all now vaccinated too, presumably.
I'm not sure that talk of hangings is helpful at the current time...
However, a massive crime against humanity has taken place and there must be accountability for this treason against the people.
We have to drill down and discover who in particular was responsible for the mandates, and those in positions of responsibility who failed to stop the vaccine mandates being imposed, i.e. the assault on personal autonomy and bodily integrity.
I don't think there is any other possible approach which has even the slightest probability of getting the attention of the people who mandated the poison mRNA jabs.
They are not only complacent in their power to murder vast numbers of people, they seem rather smug about it.
“As a health professional, I cannot comment on vaccine mandates.”
I would argue that this statement alone, if used in a clinical setting, could nullify lawful consent because the practitioner is acknowledging the presence of coercion ….
Spot on Emma!
This sentence is gold... "As a health professional, I cannot comment on vaccine mandates."
As you argue "...this statement alone, if used in a clinical setting, could nullify lawful consent because the practitioner is acknowledging the presence of coercion..."
There is so much in that fact sheet for vaccination providers which is incredible to think about...
It seems to me that Australian Government Operation COVID Shield fact sheet, published in December 2021, is a panicked reaction to your letter to then Health Minister Greg Hunt, sent in November 2021, in which you ask "Please could you advise to what extent the Commonwealth Covid-19 vaccine claims scheme provides insurance and indemnity for the civil and criminal liability that would arise where battery and clinical negligence occur due to a failure to obtain valid consent?" https://humanityattheprecipice.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/11-november-2022-covid-19-vaccine-claims-scheme.pdf
I'll return to this in a later post.
What I want to know is how much each Doctor was paid by Big Pharma per Covid vaccine injection - my understanding is that it was $250 per head vaccinated. The other thing I want to know is where the money came from to pay that $250, spent millions of times over - but I'll call it "Black Money" and was Income Tax ever paid on it.
There are Doctors who respond here - so how much were you paid for each GMO vaccine you injected?
Everyone vaccinated has been vaccinated with a Gene Therapy Injection which changed their Genetic Makeup within 6 hours of vaccination, according to published studies and they are all legally cDNA vaccinated: Dr. Peter Kotlár, a Slovak physician, government commissioner, and MP drops bombshell investigation into DNA Contamination. The vaccinated are now officially GMO!!
"I’m not afraid to say officially— a genetically modified organism.
" Robert Kennedy Jr, Pam Bondi and Kash Patel has also been informed.
Moderna's Covid-19 virus formula Patented 2013 - #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG
The US Supreme Court 2013 ruled that only cDNA (Synthetic DNA) is patentable. Isolated, natural DNA is not patentable, but in a nutshell, biotechnology companies can own living things if said things are genetically-modified and not naturally occurring - that means that The Department Of Defense (and others) can literally own a human being if this synthetic code is taken up into your Genome, which a Swedish Company observed to occur within 6 hours from Covid-19 Gene Therapy "vaccines" Injections.
Dr Madej wrote The synthetic mRNA of Pfizer and Moderna, along with the viral vector DNA delivery systems of Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca, change your "genetic code" making you genetically modified, but Moderna Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks tells you straight up that 1) The shots change your genetic code. 2) The shots do not stop the spread of Covid-19. 3) Tal Zaks says the Moderna shot is "hacking the software of life" and that Carbon Particles and Viral Vectors do the same thing. A vaccinated person is now legally, a "Trans Human" -
A Trans Human is a new species which never existed before and by Law, they have Zero Human rights, because they are no longer Human and thus, because no Rights have ever been written into Law for them, they now have Zero rights - but much like the American Slaves up to 1865, when President Lincoln wrote into Law, Rights for them.
Gene Therapy is not reversable, but now described as a forced medical treatment, which Biontech/Pfizer said "should have been licensed as a Gene Therapy Injection (2015)" and which "Targets the Dentric Cells in the Lymph Nodes (2023)" - but why?
Thomas Renz, Lawyer, identified the vaccines as being ModRNA and not mRNA
Dr Francis Boyle, the Harvard educated Law Professor who drafted the Biological Weapons and Antiterrorism Act of 1989, provided an Affidavit that Covid-19 mRNA injections are Biological Weapons and Weapons of Mass Destruction.
Dr Boyle stated that the Covid-19 injections violate Biological Weapons 18 USC 175 and Weapons and Firearms 790.166 Fla. Stat (2023).
Not one person gave valid or informed consent because they were not given all the facts about what's in it. They were told it was a vaccine but just because they changed the dictionary definition doesnt make it a vaccine if there wasn't a worldwide consensus on what the new meaning of the word now means. I can't just go and change a definition and expect everyone to know what I mean. Has anyone ever found out who changed all the online definitions? Was it the WHO that gave the order aka Bill Gates?
And the question is Sonja...what exactly is a 'vaccine'?
There's a lot to question now, including the entire ever-increasing 'womb to tomb' taxpayer-funded vaccination schedule, which is mired in conflicts of interest.
I think we all thought we knew what a vaccine was from the decades of propaganda and trusting doctors however I don't think anyone knows anymore wtf is going on with vaccines and what they truly are! However all I know is they are poison and toxic making most people ill.
The Vaccine Inside the Race to Conquer the COVID-19 Pandemic
by Joe Miller (Author), Özlem Türeci (Author), Ugur Sahin (Author)
In this book Ugur Sahin published that he thought his vaccines should have been called "Gene Therapy Injections" and that they target the Dentifrice Cells in the Lymph Nodes. though why, I have absolutely no idea - so they were never vaccines, although that is what they were sold as.
1.3% efficient for the AstraZeneca–Oxford, 1.2% for the Moderna–NIH, 1.2% for the J&J, 0.93% for the Gamaleya, and 0.84% for the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccines.
ARR vs RRR - I knew I had an explanation somewhere - the vaccinated have been fooled
Ugur Sahin Co-founder and CEO of BioNTech refuses to take the mRNA Covid vaccine because he says, “we need to ensure functionality of our whole company”
Ugur Sahin refuses to take the jab because he says he must ensure he stays "functional," in other words, he knows that the clot shot renders humans functionless, incapacitated, and seriously injured where they cannot do their job, take care of themselves, or function for their children anymore - change them into GMO's or kill them. By S.D. Wells // Jan 08, 2025
Pandemic.news, GatewayPundit.com, NaturalNews.com, NewsTarget contributed.
Seriously, would you have been vaccinated, if you knew how ineffective the vaccines were against Covid - with Pfizer Less Than 1% and the rest not much better?
The US Supreme Court Ruling 2013 with World Wide Applications was the issue here:
The US Supreme Court 2013 ruled that only cDNA (Synthetic DNA) is patentable. Isolated, natural DNA is not patentable, but in a nutshell, biotechnology companies can own living things if said things are genetically-modified and not naturally occurring - that means that The Department Of Defense (and others) can literally own a human being if this synthetic code is taken up into your Genome, which a Swedish Company observed to occur within 6 hours from Covid-19 Gene Therapy "vaccines" Injections.
Dr Madej wrote The synthetic mRNA of Pfizer and Moderna, along with the viral vector DNA delivery systems of Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca, change your "genetic code" making you genetically modified, but Moderna Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks tells you straight up that 1) The shots change your genetic code. 2) The shots do not stop the spread of Covid-19. 3) Tal Zaks says the Moderna shot is "hacking the software of life" and that Carbon Particles and Viral Vectors do the same thing. A vaccinated person is now legally, a "Trans Human" -
In other words, naturally occurring mRNA could not be patented, but cDNA ModRNA DNA could be because it was made in a laboratory and is synthetic ModRNA (mRNA), which is why all of the "Gene Therapy Injections" are patented and this was brought home in a recent European Ruling against BionTech for Pfizer who were found to have pirated Moderna's Covid-19 vaccine Patent, meaning that Moderna created the Covid-19 virus: The Expose, back in 2019 published that DARPA Scientists were bragging on Twitter that they had made the Covid-19 virus with Moderna - which Moderna went on to Patent in 2013: From that patent for Moderna's Covid-19 virus: #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG
May 17 2024 (Reuters) - Moderna (MRNA.O) said on Friday the European Patent Office had upheld the validity of one of the company's key patents #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG , a win in an ongoing COVID-19 vaccine dispute with Pfizer (PFE.N) and BioNTech (22UAy.DE)
The company has been locked in a legal battle with Pfizer-BioNTech over their COVID shot Comirnaty after suing them in 2022 for allegedly copying its mRNA technology, but presumably #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG.
Pfizer and BioNTech have countersued, alleging that Moderna's patent is invalid, after the companies' rival vaccines generated billions in revenues during the pandemic.
Pfizer said it was disappointed and would consider all legal options and may appeal the decision.
"Irrespective of the outcome of this legal matter, we will continue to manufacture and supply the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine," Pfizer said in a statement to Reuters.
BioNTech said the patent office's decision to maintain Moderna's European patent #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG "does not change our unwavering and unequivocal stance that this patent is invalid."
https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/moderna-wins-case-patent-dispute-with-pfizer-biontech-over-covid-shot-ft-reports-2024-05-17/
BUT it is the back story, which nobody has considered and that is - this is the time of The Great Reset, when total Human Population was to be reduced from 8.5 Billion in 2019 to either 500 Million or 50,000 - AND THAT HAS BEEN ACHIEVED because only a small number of people refused the Gene Therapy Injections and have remained Human - the rest are now Gene Therapy Injected Genetically Modified Organisms or GMO's their bodies owned by the Military - but not their Spirit or Soul, which "might" be in temporary residence now - but we will have to wait and see how the GMO's are disposed of - Bill Gates style.
Look up the word dentrifice-you may get a surprise.
Not one person gave valid or informed consent because -- regardless of 𝒇𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒔 -- all "consent" resulted from threats.
Exactly.
Not all, some were the result of propaganda. Many believed in the "cult".
I argue no-one gave valid consent, due to the mis/disinformation (aka lies) from 'the authorities', and the coercion and mandates.
Everyone one was impacted by the hostile climate surrounding the 'Covid' debacle, no-one could give valid consent.
As I said, elsewhere on your substack - our Politicians took "lobbying" or bribes from Big Pharma in the $Millions or Hundreds of Thousands to vote the way that Big Pharma wanted them to, which essentially means that the politicians you voted into Cabinet to look after you, filled their pockets with the money they were given, to get you all vaccinated - and it was the intention of the political power in place at the time, to put into place misinformation or disinformation bills, so that they could get away, unscathed, with what they had done and each time you have an Inquiry into the Covid vaccines, it never goes anywhere, because these same people are covering their backs and avoiding being found out.
If you have any politicians living in your vicinity, go see if they have improved their lot, new home, new posh areas, fancy cars, things which show that financially they have considerably more wealth than they started with, which they could not have got from their ministerial pay alone.
Who are “our Politicians”, what cabinet and country are you talking about?
If you signed a form before you were vaccinated, that is consent.
You say: "our Politicians took "lobbying" or bribes from Big Pharma in the $Millions or Hundreds of Thousands to vote the way that Big Pharma wanted them to..."
People making those sorts of accusations should provide evidence.
Bill Rice was able to provide evidence for America, but I don't have a clue how to find out how much Australians got paid or how to go about it - I'm guessing that your man Dutton got paid nothing in opposition, why not write to him and ask him, he might know the answer to your question?
No, signing a form without providing authentic voluntary informed consent, and being coerced and mandated to submit to vaccination, is NOT valid consent.
You are arguing a point of view which really does not matter now, because once vaccinated, the results of that vaccine cannot be reversed and whatever the vaccinated have now become, but GMO's, is what they are and it is what they have to live with in future - but - Human Laws do not include GMO's in their makeup and GMO's are now, by Human Law, Trans Humans, a new species with zero Rights of any kind and in fact, according to Christine.257's substack, when Thomas Renz and others took the vaccine makers to the Geneva convention for Crimes Against Humanity back in 2020/21 ALL of there cases were thrown out and none proceeded to Trial - conclusion, GMO's don't have any Rights, but are just like Chicken.
Once genetically modified, there is no way back, irrespective of how that modification took place - it simply does not matter.
Then, what is consent, or not, is of no consequence, when the final result is all that matters and will be dealt with accordingly, presumably.
If you signed a form before you were vaccinated, that is consent.
Not informed consent...
Hey folks, anything under EUA, you don't have to consent to take it. You CAN refuse. The corrupt 3-letter agencies made it so as to appear to STOOPID UHMERUKUNZ that they actually had the legislative, judicial and enforcement powers, as if a mandate is a real law, and got the private CORPORATIONS to force their employees into a "prisoners' dilemma" and be forcibly injected with the toxic bullshit.
I don't suppose anyone has given valid consent for vaccines ever. They were not told 'By the way this contains the disease causing agent and various toxic substances, are you happy with this?'
No one ever told me when I had a BCG ivax at age 15 or when I had a tetanus around 30 years old.
Canada had the same tyrannical procedure in effect. Although I am retired, so wasn't threatened with job loss, all the other penalties were inflicted upon me and I was the pariah exemplified by Trudeau. I lost 2 years of playing in my orchestra, not even allowed to hear them play; no gym time in the winter, no travel, etc. After Canada had loosened its mandates, I was to sing in Carnegie Hall; paid my $1,000 deposit, but lost it when NY required the jab to fly. And still the boosters are being pushed, and children are at risk.
I had a similar experience in South Australia, Pete.
I'm retired too, so the job mandates didn't get me, but I was excluded from participation in society we usually take for granted - going to the cinema and theatre; going to the gym and golf; going to galleries and museums, etc. Other states were more severe, even excluding people from retail shopping and hairdressing; and hospitality such as restaurants, bars, pubs, hotels, cafes etc.
It was No Jab, No Life... Punishment for refusing to comply with illegitimate 'orders'.
Wow...this happened in our supposed 'free countries', this blatant discrimination against critical thinking people who refused to sacrifice their bodily autonomy on the government's demand.
So many people collaborated with this ostracism, splitting families and friendships.
And all for a phoney baloney 'Covid crisis', which was deliberately manufactured to fleece the people, and set them up to be enslaved in a social credit system.
Criminals and traitors to the people did this...
How do we bring them to account?
My presumption is this: You are a GMO, a Genetically Modified Organism, your body owned by the Armed Forces of your Country, to do with as they please, because you are no longer Human and now, after Genetic Modifying Injections, (vaccines) you have Zero Human Rights and your Spirit is in temporary residence accordingly. Bill Gates owns the patents to make you into a GMO Robot, so presumably, do your Armed Forces. I prefer to remain Human with all of my Human Rights intact. What does this mean for you in future - I have absolutely no idea, but sooner you than me. It was, after all, a matter of personal choice. You volunteered to be GMO vaccinated. I refused, under Australian Common Law, Section 51, of the Legal Code. Things are never done without purpose, it remains to be seen what that GMO purpose is.
Who are you saying 'volunteered to be GMO vaccinated'?
They don’t answer!
Can you please provide a link to Section 51 of the Legal Code of Australian Common Law re: refusing a “vaccine”. What you’ve written is simple, but I’m unable to find where Section 51 may be used to legally refuse “vaccines”.
You don’t read articles or people’s comments correctly Christine/richard. You need to do this before you make your nonsensical comments.
You are simply not qualified to “judge” others, and you randomly announce what other people have done, or become, in your opinion. Presume nothing.
If you keep doing this, someone will have you in court for libel.
And you won’t have any Human Rights intact if you get hoodwinked into getting onboard the digital ID, which is not a simple digital ID, it’s a biometric ID. From what I’ve heard-not confirmed though-it will be an or both iris scan.
Now if someone hacks into our digital biometric ID, and uses it to commit a crime, how can we prove we didn’t commit the crime? We obviously can’t swap our eyeballs around!
We hunt them down and we HANG them-- Every last one of "them!!!"
Me, too. I'm in California. The auditorium where our orchestra performs is under the auspices of the county government. They were forbidding any un-" vaccinated" person from entering any city, county, state or federally-controlled building without proof of quackcination.. I was out for a year. Then the Players' Committee at Santa Rosa Symphony told their admin that they had to let their unvaxxed players back to work, OR ELSE, and that's when things began to change in the Bay Area, Ground Zero in heavily chem-sprayed California, for the Plandemic. The A.F. of M. took a very pro-vax stance. I would at least like to have them compensate me for the missed pension contributions for the time and remuneration that our lying, conniving sycophantic government stole from us.
That’s just awful Pete. You must be very talented. I’m sad for you. And you rightly state that children are at risk, very much so. Very sad also.
"We're going to force it on you all, especially if you do not want it, but you have to give us immunity by saying that you consent".
The bastards need to be ██████████ and ███████ while of course ensuring ████ ██████████ and ██████████.
Intrigued by your redacted words Evil Harry!
Re "...you have to give us immunity by saying that you consent".
Seriously, this was their tactic! They are deluded.
Anyway, the upshot now is...there is NO VALID CONSENT.
Who is going to bear responsibility for this travesty?
Plausible deniability.
I'm in the UK, where we currently have zero free speech and people being arrested for "non crime incidents".
So I hope that when people see my redactions they understand the sentiment and fill in the blanks, without actually seeing the pesky words that "Starmers Stasi" are so very keen to police.
The end result is all that matters - the vaccines "Gene Therapy Injections" cannot be reversed and the vaccinated are all now GMO's "Genetically Modified Organisms" in keeping with Bill Gates desire to reduce Humans to 50,000 or 500 Million and that has now been achieved, the final numbers, anyone's guess, since those in the know are not telling. It is a bit like going to sleep White and waking up Black - or vice versa - it is how it is and now the GMO's have zero Human Rights, because zero Rights were ever written into Law for GMO's, so they have the same Rights, legally, as the Black Slaves prior to 1865, so that, theoretically, they cannot comment on Human matters which no longer apply to them, either, because, well, they have the same Rights as Chicken.
The problem i have is that if mRNA is natural to all things on this planet and the key to Heaven, by identifying the dead according to their genetic makeup, or call sign, mRNA - then what door does the synthetic ModRNA DNA patented Gene Therapy Modified "Genetically Modified Organisms" open after death, instead - with all Catholics ordered to be vaccinated by your spiritual leader, the Pope himself, but vaccinated like him?
A heads up only, to consider and hope for the best, but death, something none of us can avoid, sooner or later.
If you believe in God the Father, God the Son, and The Holy Spirit, and lead your life accordingly, then God’s Judgement may be the outcome you aim for.
I in no way approve of the pope. Obviously I am not catholic.
There is much more than messenger RNA to be considered for entry to Heaven. Hoping “for the best” is useless at best.
If you richard, would like to know more about this, DM me.
Peoeike you make my day. Thanks.
There was a parallel situation when people argued that lockdowns were an infringement of human rights - including the right to freedom of movement and freedom of assembly. We were told most emphatically by the Victorian premier and his henchpersons - the tone was extremely overbearing, if not threatening - and I quote - "This is not a matter of human rights". Really??? The unspoken assumption is that human rights are given and can be taken away by the government. If nothing else, this shows that the rhetoric of human rights carries no weight with the authorities in Australia, except when it happens to have implications that suit their own agenda.
Stephen, re "The unspoken assumption is that human rights are given and can be taken away by the government."
I'm not going along with that 'assumption'.
We must have our freedom, I do not consent to tyranny.
It wasn't a matter of human rights, it was a matter of common sense. People gave up thinking sensibly.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2023/09/23/g-is-for-guidance/
On Danny Boy.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/01/27/daniel-andrews/
Well done Elizabeth! They could just as easily have a government goon with a revolver standing on one side of the victim and the nurse on the other. The goon would say "Consent to the jab or get a bullet in the head from my gun". And then the nurse would ask "Do you consent to this injection?"
Australians should be in no doubt that they are now - curently - living under a vile dictatorship that holds them in utter contempt. None of this has gone away. They are now building the digital prison from which there will be no escape. Believe me, I have intimate knowledge of the 'public service' mentality in this country. There is an increasingly vast unelected bureaucracy - correctly termed the 'administrative state' - which controls the government and is responsible for documents such as the one you have revealed here. The mindset is truly totalitarian. These people really do believe that the public are morons who need to be told what to do and how to live. I mean this literally. This is not an exaggeration. We are in a very dangerous situation in my view. The governments of Australia - state and federal - showed their fangs during the 'pandemic'. But nothing has been done to mitigate the threat. The same people, with the same power, are still running the country.
Thanks Stephen.
Re: "They could just as easily have a government goon with a revolver standing on one side of the victim and the nurse on the other. The goon would say "Consent to the jab or get a bullet in the head from my gun". And then the nurse would ask "Do you consent to this injection?"
I would really like to get a cartoon of this scenario - not 'the bullet in the head', but rather the threat of losing livelihood and participation in society - which is a pretty dire threat!
Perhaps Ann would oblige if she hasn't already done something suitable.
https://annecantstandit.substack.com/
Thank you Elizabeth. "Get vaccinated or get penalised" is correct. Although I can`t help thinking that "Operation COVID Shield" is also misleading with it`s statements. For consent to be legally valid, the following elements must be present:
"It must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue PRESSURE, COERCION or MANIPULATION" and, the potential risks, benefits and options have been explained,
"Operation Covid Shield" does not seem to consider this element of coercion when they make their statements. Simply saying yes under coercion is not valid consent. The only way anyone would know their statements are misleading, is by reading the fine print down the bottom which refers to the "Australian Immunisation Handbook.
Agree Peter, there is much to take apart in the Operation COVID Shield fact sheet.
In the first instance, I just wanted to share it in its entirety, so people can see the 'information for vaccination providers' published by the Australian Government, and make their own judgements.
Blessings & gratitude to you EH for being a true medical TRUTH Warrior. In GOD we Trust ...
food for thought:
https://www.americaoutloud.news/the-theory-behind-vaccination-is-fatally-flawed/
Thanks for the link Rogier.
I've been investigating vaccination policy and practice over the last 16 years.
When I first started, with pet vaccination, I had no particular antagonism against vaccination generally, hadn't thought much about it, and was particularly focussed on the over-use of vaccine products.
But now...after 16 years...I'm questioning ALL the vaccine products, multi-component shots, revaccinations. They must all be subject to the spotlight, including the conflicts of interest which surround vaccination schedules.
What is the hardest is to be able to be objective about the paradigm you grew up in, and realize where and how it lies to us. On one level Thomas Kuhn is a great guide. On another level, spiritual work is helpful, but it remains different to break out of the paradigm. Of course in our covid experience, we can be ever so grateful for the likes of Denis Rancourt, and Mike Yeadon, (and others) who have shown us the courage to trust their own eyes, and extricate themselves from the indoctrination that would say our eyes are lying to us…
At times, I try a thought experiment of having a group of Papua cannibalistic tribesmen watching us on television and laughing their asses off about the cult that is our western culture, complete with the Stockholm syndrome about our “healthcare system.” It is truly too absurd, especially here in America, if we’ve known for so long now that iatrogenic disease is the 3rd leading cause of death, and no doubt, taking the vaxx into account, it is now the first leading cause of death, And then we pay double or more than anyone in any other part of the world.
I asked my father, a vaxx-sceptic MD (psychiatrist), at age 8 or so, why it was that the kids who got all their vaccinations were sick all the time, and sixty years later, Dr Paul Thomas delivered the proof on a silver platter. In short, I find myself now at the point that the whole vaccination schedule is a case of ritual abuse, to indoctrinate people in a way of understanding their own health to the benefit of the providers, and the annual physical, is just a (almost) mandatory Tupperware party for big pharma. It almost gets funny if it weren’t so tragic, especially when you see how people you love and care for are so completely blinded with the indoctrination.
However, we are in the throes of a deep change, and some of that gives me some hope. At least some people are starting to wake up.
In the USA, the con-vid quackzines were a special kind of crazy.
They are still to this day called "countermeasures" as if there was some bio weapon. The only bio weapon is the psychological operation, but here's the latest sociopathic court decision. Apparently, informed consent doesn't apply to martial law type bullshit. Beautiful disaster...
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/maines-supreme-court-affirms-the
Rob, in Australia, we have confirmation from the Australian Government that 'informed consent should be obtained'...in December 2021 and November 2022.
I have shared this information over and over again...
But, strangely, people in the so-called 'freedom movement' that has sprung up in 'Covid' times don't seem to be interested in this information...it's bizarre!
Anyway, here it is again...
See my paper: Misfeasance in Public Office? The Destruction of Voluntary Informed Consent for Vaccination, June 2024: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/misfeasance-in-public-office-the-destruction-of-voluntary-informed-consent-for-vaccination.pdf
Australia was getting the official "approved" jabs or did they also do that switcheroo where the approved never existed?
Because in the US, the only shots available were the pre licensed one. Not the corminaty or spikevax final products.
It might hint at whether it was done as a "countermeasure" or through the official medical route.
The first step to recovery is admitting its a military operation.
Suppose a bushranger rides up to your stage coach brandishing a revolver and says "Your money or your life". Having weighed the pros and cons, you decide to hand over the money. According to the Australian Government, you have just given your "voluntary informed consent" to the transaction! The mind boggles.
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Utilizes Nucleoside-Modified Messenger RNA (modRNA) Technology not mRNA, Pfizer Documents Reveal
by Jim Hoft Aug. 20, 2023 8:20 pm
Vials of the COVID-19 vaccine are seen at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Md., Dec. 14, 2020.
Lawyer Tom Renz has exposed that the COVID-19 vaccines, widely advertised as mRNA (messenger RNA) vaccines, are in fact lab-created hybrids known as modRNA.
https://christine257.substack.com/p/massive-unintended-consequences-in
Mandatory vaccination is illegal under Australian Law and would be subject to Legal Proceedings under Common Law against Section 51 of the Legal Code.
The Constitution prohibits any form of compulsion, which would subject citizens to medical or pharmaceutical services, including mandatory vaccination. They should remain free to decide whether they wish to receive certain medical treatments, including vaccination and they should not be disadvantaged by any government on the ground of their own voluntary decisions.
A friend went into hospital with a broken heel. I provided the above which she gave to the nursing staff. They ran for cover and not one person came near her, except for her heel treatment while she was in hospital for about 10 days and she ordered the above was kept on her file, should she need to go to hospital, ever again.
I carry the above in my wallet all of the time. If I am challenged, I pass a copy to the person giving me a hard time. The results are always satisfying, to say the least.
There is a Section 51 Government Department in the major city near you and they have a form for you to complete and then they will pursue anyone who has defaulted, in the above Law and against you, but on your behalf.
I'm not too sure how the Section 51 staff would handle it though, since they are all now vaccinated too, presumably.
It's astounding how many believe that mandatory medication is actually good foe every one of us-- !!!
It is essential for the survival of humanity that everyone who imposed injection mandates be hanged for their crimes against humanity:
https://patrick.net/post/1377537/2022-11-03-everyone-who-imposed-toxxine-mandates
The mere PUBLIC discussion of hanging the criminals helps to protect us all more than anything else we can do short of armed revolution.
Please, everyone, keep speaking in PUBLIC about the absolute necessity of hanging the vaxx-mandating criminals.
I'm not sure that talk of hangings is helpful at the current time...
However, a massive crime against humanity has taken place and there must be accountability for this treason against the people.
We have to drill down and discover who in particular was responsible for the mandates, and those in positions of responsibility who failed to stop the vaccine mandates being imposed, i.e. the assault on personal autonomy and bodily integrity.
I think it is a splendid idea and I am glad I am not the only one. I did worry that I was psycho for thinking that way.
I don't think there is any other possible approach which has even the slightest probability of getting the attention of the people who mandated the poison mRNA jabs.
They are not only complacent in their power to murder vast numbers of people, they seem rather smug about it.