Ther word 'person' is a Legal System term that can also refer to a company or more correctlyn I think to a Corporation and may not be relevant simply to a living man or woman UNLESS you accept that you are Legally a person. Not an easy issue to deal with that one.
NEXT and perhaps more directly relevant. Did any one of those 70+ thousand employees have in their contract of employment ANY clause that allows the employer to demand a vaccination or ANY medical intervention at all.
Sounds silly, but could an employer such as Westpac or CBA demand a Frontal Lobotomy for ALL 70+thousand employees, or say a leg or arm amputation, could anything like these be enforced within the terms of the agreed contract? Could anything like these interventions be Mandated by the employer which is bound by the same contract and contract laws as employees? A contract of employment is an agreement and two parties are needed and neither can unilaterally change that agreement except within the terms of the agreement.
This is where the issue of whether you accept being a 'person' comes into the situation. It has nothing to do with human rights, justice or anything of that nature - it is ALL commerce so think only commerce and find Remedy.
Matters not in terms of any contract. "Mandate- All employees to walk to their place of employment in bare feet" for example. When not within the terms of the agreed contract, this order cannot be mandated or demanded or made a condition of employment and Fairwork and all that nonsense crowd can go bite their own bum as they too do not have the jurisdiction to enforce physical interventions on the body of any living man or woman. A 'person' being a commercial entity may be subject to such a mandate but I think such a mandate or demand also must be within the terms of the agreement as already exists.
Think ONLY in terms of commercial contract. Due diligence over the health implications is irrelevant - it is all 'Whats in the Contract agreed'.
Peter, it's not just about 'contracts' and 'persons' etc...
It comes down to pure common sense...which unfortunately isn't very common...
Why on earth were vaccine products being pressed upon mass populations, against a disease it was known from the beginning wasn't a serious threat to most people?!
Why didn't the medical and scientific establishment call this out from the beginning? Because doctors and scientists and others know it is career suicide to question the blessed Church of Vaccination.
As far as the Australian Legal System and supposed Laws are concerned it is ALL commerce. To try to do anything in the legal system it is necessary to only think in terms of commerce and contract. Legal System and Law are not the same thing btw
Full Disclosure is required though often not given which effectively negates the agreement if made. That said ONLY with full agreement of both parties can a contract contain any clause especially one that might include a requirement foro a medical procedure, and in this I mean one that could potentially be harmful and I include all invasive ones like injections as they bypass ALL the normal front line defenses of what people call the immune system. That said people have a responsibility to read their contracts and be certain that they agree with every word of it. Most do not read nor comprehend what is offered nor do they seek clarity, and just sign. A commercial contract is not about right or justice - it is cold hard commerce.
I believe that either employment contracts did not contain ANY provision for one party to demand ANY compliance with a medical mandate before the so called pandemic, or they were altered either quietly before or subsequently with people not informed fully if at all.
I do not believer ANY of the Mandates were Lawful and in any event they could not alter employment contracts to enforce a mandate plus in my view no employer could be forced to demand a medical intervention, certainly not an invasive one with an unproven product, by a government. What happened most likely was businesses were threatened with massive fines and sanctions if the employers would not obey the government demands just as people were.
There is no release from responsibility for any man or woman as employer or employee to do harm and ALL are accountable for their actions. Always.
I don't think it would be a remedy if employers could demand that new employees would have to sign a contract demanding they have vaccinations to get the job.
Vaccinations are a medical intervention that must be a personal decision whether to have them or not - a properly informed and voluntary decision without pressure, coercion, manipulation...or mandates.
Could it possibly be that the major investors in all our four major banks are the likes of Blackrock, Vanguard et al - all working for n behalf of WEF and depopulation agenda?
It's also interesting to consider that the World Economic Forum says it "provides a global, impartial and not-for-profit platform for meaningful connection between stakeholders to establish trust, and build initiatives for cooperation and progress".
Spot a n and most of these banks cross own the smaller banks . We were with Bank of Melbourne when Westpac did a hostile takeover. We had previously had bad dealings with Westpac. They promised repeatedly they would honour all contacts held by BOM customers, they didn’t and breached the home loan contract giving all the equity to my former partner They had this unspoken arrangement where they gave people “preferred customer” status. That is if one partner had held their income potential, they felt free to breach contracts knowing full well the other could not afford the legal battle. They left me mentally and financially broken.
You a not alone. www.bankvictims.com list many more, thousands I suspect. One local man and his wife lost everything, a million dollar business, the buildings and their home as well all with the assistance of CBA managers it would seem. The bank people ignored court orders to produce documents as evidence. Problem is this man and his wife thought they could deal in rights and justice and trusted lawyers to represent them which even the best most honorable lawyer and/or barrister cannot do without busting their oath and insurance bonds. Nor can the judges for the same reasons. Sorry to hear of your troubles.
All in commerce is the only way and settle before the court - its a corporation too.
For a trained nurse I made a pretty good lawyer. First I argued back and forth through the Banking Ombudsman- he was an ex bank employee. I got admissions in writing that they had indeed breached the contract. But the bank refused to settle, and the ombudsman had no power to compel them to. ( totally fake pretend organisation). Then I was dragged into the Supreme Court, again I did all my own legal work, while searching for some sort of legal help. Three weeks before the court date a lawyer came on board through LIV ( vic legal assoc) then three days before a barrister. By then because of a feral divorce and other complex issues I was mentally broken- I didn’t attend court. I received a call telling me I’d won but the bank was appealing the following Monday. On that day I was told the judgment was overturned and I had to comply with a long list of demands, and if I didn’t do so promptly I would be jailed for contempt of court. I kept requesting the paperwork, in my mental state at the time I complied. When I finally saw the paperwork, turns out the master of the Supreme Court found the bank had a case to answer. I also remember the barrister in my one meeting telling me he had the same arrangement with his ex-wife, note ex- wife and the bank had never seen a need to get her signature. Conflict of interest much! . I suspect a significant number of the judiciary has the same conflict. The average person is playing against a stacked deck. I also don’t remember any of this in the banking royal commission.
I read somewhere that there is a sequence of codons in the mRNA that that codes for the site that CRISPR uses to break and insert DNA. That makes me wonder if this was only part two of a three-part bioweapon. 1. Cause fear and sickness, 2. Cause damage, death, and prime survivors for future genetic modification by adding this site to their DNA 3. Follow up with another shot containing DNA for the final desired gene modifications.
Well, I wouldn't put it passed them to do this. There is definitely a very dark agenda behind all this. Create one pandemic after another and come up with a solution which is not really a solution, but a poison to get rid of you.
To quote someone who wrote:- "I am not stuck in the system; the system is stuck in me. I may choose to openly declare my sovereignty. I can choose to just say No."
Mahatma Gandhi said much the same, "No", he pointed out is the strongest word in any language and it is anything BUT passive to say No and stand in your claim. .
Wise man was Gandhi. Vaccines are Turtles all the way down as there is actually no scientific basis. And the mRNA jabs are not vaccines at all until the definition of what a vaccine is was changed as it was in early 2020 or there about in order to include this different technology. Maybe a message in there perhaps?
What transpired in March 2020 onwards is a MONUMENTAL SATANIC EVIL CRIME. I visited my local Westpac branch regularly and I was polite to the tellers empathising with them. One of them was very upset with me because she was forced to wear a mask and could hardly breathe and she was clearly under distress. Anyway the tellers told me they had to get the jabs to keep their job which they all did, and wear masks at the same time, and a few months later after they were jabbed how many times, the branch closed and they lost their jobs and livelihoods. I asked them if the vaccine is protecting you, why are you wearing a mask - and they came up with their script answer to protect people. Of course, I felt for their predicament and felt for them deeply. The central bankers, the big banks in Australia I believe have the identical major shareholder owners. The banks are criminal institutions. It was the government and the propaganda media with corporate complicity, forcing these poisons, and it is force, it is force. People can't go to work unless they get the poison and more poisons on top? This is force. That the covid10 was formulated in labs prior to March 2020, and the scamdemic was planned. They want the issue to go away, whilst people die, get cancers, auto immune diseases, even mad -cow disease, skin disease, neurological conditions, what not.... and they continue to push the jabs and new jabs. What a monumental crime. This is not new - just the scale of it.
That is probably going to be pushed to be the next big pandemic. They engineer these things in their level 4 labs by doing gain of function research and make synthetic copies because these are easier to make on a large scale. It is all poison, and then they have a so-called antidote called a vaccine, which really isn't an antidote but another poison to drive the last nail in the coffin. They are all insane in my book.
Ah, yes, I see they are well prepared for the next ONE, whatever it may be. Strange how they always know before hand, even years, that a certain virus will become a pandemic. It's that revolving door again between the pharma groups. government departments, health authorities, WEF and WHO, to make money out of us while slowly killing us. What a wonderful business model.
It is genocide. It is that factual. Mike Yeadon ex Pfizer vice president and ex Senior Pfizer Scientist has said from the start of the scamdemic, that the vaccines are deliberately designed to harm.
I don't understand why there is not currently, large numbers of (former) bank employees, suing the bank, either for unfare dismissal, or forced administration of a medical intervention ie assault & battery.?
My doctor gave me a “doctor’s note” - the usual kind. My work place would not accept it. Went back to my doctor, he told me sorry can’t give an official form exemption. When I argued, he told me to go get a second opinion. So I lost my job. 🤷🏻♀️
Rita, there should not be 'exemptions' for vaccination, as people should be giving their voluntary informed consent to this medical intervention, or refusing it if they so wish.
I would like to say the Australian government needs to get real and tell employers and other would-be dictators that they cannot legally force people to take a vaccine. But of course they will never do that because in reality they do not believe in ANY human rights - as evidenced during the pandemic. Not the right to freedom of movement, or freedom of assembly, or freedom of speech, or freedom to visit the sick in hospitals, or freedom to receive treatment as determined by one's (uncoerced and unbrainwashed) doctor. What governments believe is that you, the citizen, have no rights other than those graciously granted to you by the authorities. If this is not tyranny, what is?
The fact is that we Australians are living today in a proto-totalitarian state. The surveillance systems are being built as we speak, like invisible prison walls, slowly rising. Digital ID, which most people DO NOT WANT is being imposed inexorably. You cannot make a doctor's appointment or do many other normal things now without stating your Date of Birth - once considered private information. You may as well get it tattooed on your forehead, although that will not be necessary either, because the authorities are implementing Chinese communist-style facial recognition systems as fast as they can go. Cash is being taken away, so that all your purchases can be monitored. The banks are already starting to assert their new-found right to refuse service to anyone whose opinions they do not like (known in the popular media as 'debanking').
The deluded useful idiots running the Australian health system will inevitably go along with forced vaccination next time. Just remember the bizarre, mindless, hysterical outbursts delivered by premiers and senior health officials deriding, insulting, abusing and threatening people who did want the vaccine last time round. These people have not gone away. They are gearing up for Disease X.
I have a letter from the Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care, dated 17 November 2022, which states: "Informed consent should be obtained for every COVID-19 vaccination, as per usual consent procedures for other vaccinations."
That's confirmation from the Australian Government...the same duplicitous Australian Government that knew very well that vaccination mandates had been imposed across the country.
Let's try and be proactive and effective in getting accountability for this matter. Are you writing to your state and federal MPs?
Keening and wailing gets us nowhere, we have to try and take effective action.
Stephen, I believe they are just waiting for the WHO to vote on their Treaty and IHR amendments and then they can double down on us little people even more harshly the next time, which is just around the corner. Our present premier in WA was not elected because he took over from Mark McGowan who stepped down, but the way he has been talking lately about what he is going to do in the next pandemic should have everyone worried.
Rewind; were the "leader's" of these organisations & others invited to the National Cabinet to give their commitment to the government(s) & possibly received an inducement for their cooperation? Only one way to find out.
What is needed Julie, imo, is an massive groundswell of support by ALL fair minded Australian's to DEMAND OUR documents UNREDACTED. ALL of the answers are there.
That’s unlikely, while we were sleeping, governments have progressively been building more and more on NDA’s and commercial in confidence surrounding contracts where they are spending your money. Simultaneously they have been giving so much power to unelected bureaucrats to sign international agreements and n our behalf without public or parliamentary scrutiny. We are in a situation where a bureaucrat signs WHO treaties and have control over internet censorship. The list is very long. We elect them and they do as they please.
Fantastic 'hypothetical', Elizabeth. One which no doubt played out in reality in thousands of consultation rooms across Australia in late 2021-early 2022.
As a former nurse, my answer to your question is absolutely, unequivocally, the doctor (nurse, pharmacists, other 'vaccinator') must not proceed. The person is clearly not giving consent, and I would also argue this extends to people who didn't necessarily say "I don't want the vaccine", but expressed any concern regarding being subject to a mandate, or simply showed visible signs of distress (crying, vomiting, etc.).
Flowing on from these individual interactions, healthcare professionals should have been publicly vocal about these grossly unethical policies and the effects they were seeing on patients. Yes, I know they had job and livelihood concerns of their own, but these professions are held to a higher account and operating at this level of self-interest is unacceptable.
I am utterly horrified at what has unfolded over the last few years, and I am so deeply sorry that so many people have been psychologically and/or physically harmed.
I lost my job of 10 years in the W.A. resources Sector, for Asking 'TOO MANY' questions on 'Safety' concerns, per the CONVID-19 Jab Manufacturers OWN Safety Data Sheets [SDS or MSDS - Material Safety Data Sheet](Pfizer/Moderna 2020/21 - In plain Black & White, for EVERYONE to see, how Dodgy this U.S. DoD/DARPA/'G' network interactives 'JABS' - NOT 'Vaccine' by Standard definition- Were!!), And 'Holes' therein in 'Test results' & UNknown Outcomes 'IDENTIFIED' by said pHARMa's SDS>MANDATORY 'Testing & Trials' Data per Same CONVID 'Products'- 'REQUIRED' Before 'Release on/into Open Public 'Markets'. Copies of ALL said SDS, WERE passed onto our HSEQs & Management teams by myself, whilst still employed, with ZERO investigation/ response, on what I considered to be A, 'Major cause for concern > Co-workers Health & Safety, & Possible serious incidents on/In Heavy Machinery Operations- relevent to The Mining industry @ Large. So much for 'Safety in the Workplace!!'Note; Please Do not get me started on Govt 'Oversight & OFFICIAL Watchdogging Agencies = THE 'Rubber Stamp & Pass after reading [If at all, OR, Non understanding of said informations therein\, of Corporate Fantasy & Fictional Data.'
With even this info in mind, per the Official CONVID-19, 'Exercise/Exorcise' Jab SDSs, let's move on to Pfizer's OWN 'ATTACHMENT A' warnings, sent to ALL 'Health Providers' & Consumers - Mmm Consumers. I wonder if Your Previous mentioned 'Medical professionals', AND, Including Associated Govt TGA, CMOs, Premiers & Cabinet, Vaccine Commandants, Pharma 'Funded' Institutes such as the Doherty Institute which 'Advise' ATAGI, Were M.I.A. for 3 Plus Years, whilst THIS Circulated - AND STILL?? Sorry folks, don't have the PDF on Attachment A - Will have to relate 'long hand'. All 'Emphasis' is Pharma's OWN!
ATTACHMENT A.
Important Information for Health providers and Consumers. Australia
Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine COMIRNATY BNT162b2.
SAFETY
* WARNING; THIS VACCINE MAY CAUSE SERIOUS ILLNESS AND DEATH.
* This vaccine is new and experimental and has not been fully validated for safety and efficacy.
* This vaccine has not been safety- tested for medium term and long term side-effects.
* This vaccine has not been tested for genetic impacts.
* If you are pregnant or breastfeeding, immune comprimised, otherwise ill, frail or taking other medications, or an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander, you should not take this vaccine.
EFFICACY
* This vaccine may not prevent infection or give lasting protection from infection.
* This vaccine may not prevent viral transmission.
* This vaccine will not reduce symptoms.
* Before taking this vaccine, you should carefully weigh the risks and benefits against the risks associated with infections, including Mortality and morbidity data.
* You should carefully consider whether this vaccine is right for you in all circumstances.
AppaRentLie, ALL of the Above 'Medical Cabal' AND The Fedral Political Circle, AND State Premiers, ALL, must 'KNOW' More than the CONVID-19 'VAXX' Manufacturers, to STILL push ahead with 'Mandates' And the 'SAFE & EFFECTIVE' - NOT, LIE!! 'Safe & Effective' = HOW, BY ANY METRIC, With the above 'Statements' by Corporate Pharma, IS, that at all 'POSSIBLE'?
Ask TOO MANY relevant 'Safety' questions, Reward= One gets the Sack! So much for 'Got You & Your Mates Back' = MORE Corporate 'Box Ticking'!
I Thought 'Attachment A' content- if not seen before, may be some extra intel, relevant per conversation.
Just imagine if enought people stop "believing" and started to say "no thank you". There is no way an employer can afford to lose a hugh percentage of their trained work force over night. Oh how I wish for more vaccine hesitancy!!!
Yes Jack - and we need the vaccinators to be aware of their obligation to obtain voluntary informed consent for vaccination...and to find out they DO NOT have specific indemnity for administering the COVID-19 injections. I'll do a substack on this soon.
Canada was another one that went over the tips of its skis. Everywhere mandated the jabs. So if you said no, it was no job, no unemployment benefit, no welfare, you couldn't go anywhere without showing a vaccine passport...
Not the most 8 months of fun in my life - but I knew I couldn't take the vaccines.
So...
And soon they'll probably lock us down for climate change and bird flu...
Love this. If you attend a doctor, nurse or any other regulated profession and tell them that you are being mandated to take a medical treatment the ONLY response should be "I can't provide this medical treatment to you under these circumstances and I would like your permission to report the person forcing you to take it to the authorities, for attempted assault"
"I can't provide this medical treatment to you under these circumstances and I would like your permission to report the person forcing you to take it to the authorities, for attempted assault"
Our family GP gave my then 20 year old and only-just turned 18 year old a “consent” form they had to sign stating they agreed with the procedure and confirmed they weren’t allergic to any of the ingredients in the “product”. No ingredients were listed, obviously. What a ludicrous situation.
It's such a farce! It's illogical to maintain that people should take a dangerous gene therapy that protects no one from anything, & likely endangers health & may kill the recipient! What is the benefit to the employer? They fire longterm employees who refuse, & will lose a good portion of their jabbed employees as the jab damage disables some & suddenly kills others! I'm not sure how to get through to the tone deaf. Some are idiots, some are just plain evil.
Exactly, there's money or favors changing hands somewhere for so many big businesses to automatically be in lockstep with corrupted gov't, or is it the depopulation plan, replacing workers with robots & slave labor from the replacement migrants, some of whom think they're coming here for a better life? It's like we're living in BIZARO world or Twilight Zone.
Is a way of reducing the number of their employees. Banks are closing branches and reducing staff. If they refuse the vaccine there are no redundancy payments just severance? It looks very dodgy to be insisting on vaccines unless it is in their contracts or they are looking for ways to get rid of staff. Or are the people who run these banks just stupid?
Ther word 'person' is a Legal System term that can also refer to a company or more correctlyn I think to a Corporation and may not be relevant simply to a living man or woman UNLESS you accept that you are Legally a person. Not an easy issue to deal with that one.
NEXT and perhaps more directly relevant. Did any one of those 70+ thousand employees have in their contract of employment ANY clause that allows the employer to demand a vaccination or ANY medical intervention at all.
Sounds silly, but could an employer such as Westpac or CBA demand a Frontal Lobotomy for ALL 70+thousand employees, or say a leg or arm amputation, could anything like these be enforced within the terms of the agreed contract? Could anything like these interventions be Mandated by the employer which is bound by the same contract and contract laws as employees? A contract of employment is an agreement and two parties are needed and neither can unilaterally change that agreement except within the terms of the agreement.
This is where the issue of whether you accept being a 'person' comes into the situation. It has nothing to do with human rights, justice or anything of that nature - it is ALL commerce so think only commerce and find Remedy.
Re: "...could an employer such as Westpac or CBA demand a Frontal Lobotomy for ALL 70+thousand employees, or say a leg or arm amputation...?"
Good question Peter!
And did the likes of Westpac and CBA do their due diligence?
Exactly why did they demand their employees have this medical intervention, the Covid-19 injections...?
Matters not in terms of any contract. "Mandate- All employees to walk to their place of employment in bare feet" for example. When not within the terms of the agreed contract, this order cannot be mandated or demanded or made a condition of employment and Fairwork and all that nonsense crowd can go bite their own bum as they too do not have the jurisdiction to enforce physical interventions on the body of any living man or woman. A 'person' being a commercial entity may be subject to such a mandate but I think such a mandate or demand also must be within the terms of the agreement as already exists.
Think ONLY in terms of commercial contract. Due diligence over the health implications is irrelevant - it is all 'Whats in the Contract agreed'.
Peter, it's not just about 'contracts' and 'persons' etc...
It comes down to pure common sense...which unfortunately isn't very common...
Why on earth were vaccine products being pressed upon mass populations, against a disease it was known from the beginning wasn't a serious threat to most people?!
Why didn't the medical and scientific establishment call this out from the beginning? Because doctors and scientists and others know it is career suicide to question the blessed Church of Vaccination.
There is much to be investigated and exposed about the onslaught of vaccine products on the ever-increasing, taxpayer-funded, 'womb to tomb' schedule, it's not just about Covid vaccination: https://www.health.gov.au/topics/immunisation/when-to-get-vaccinated/national-immunisation-program-schedule
It's way past time to shine the spotlight on this morass of conflicts of interests, to get this talked about in the court of public opinion.
As far as the Australian Legal System and supposed Laws are concerned it is ALL commerce. To try to do anything in the legal system it is necessary to only think in terms of commerce and contract. Legal System and Law are not the same thing btw
Peter, can you please clarify your position?
Are you suggesting it would be ok for an employer to initiate a contract with an employee with a demand that they be vaccinated for their job?
Full Disclosure is required though often not given which effectively negates the agreement if made. That said ONLY with full agreement of both parties can a contract contain any clause especially one that might include a requirement foro a medical procedure, and in this I mean one that could potentially be harmful and I include all invasive ones like injections as they bypass ALL the normal front line defenses of what people call the immune system. That said people have a responsibility to read their contracts and be certain that they agree with every word of it. Most do not read nor comprehend what is offered nor do they seek clarity, and just sign. A commercial contract is not about right or justice - it is cold hard commerce.
I believe that either employment contracts did not contain ANY provision for one party to demand ANY compliance with a medical mandate before the so called pandemic, or they were altered either quietly before or subsequently with people not informed fully if at all.
I do not believer ANY of the Mandates were Lawful and in any event they could not alter employment contracts to enforce a mandate plus in my view no employer could be forced to demand a medical intervention, certainly not an invasive one with an unproven product, by a government. What happened most likely was businesses were threatened with massive fines and sanctions if the employers would not obey the government demands just as people were.
There is no release from responsibility for any man or woman as employer or employee to do harm and ALL are accountable for their actions. Always.
All of your points are humanly valid - but Peter is proposing a legal remedy.
I don't think it would be a remedy if employers could demand that new employees would have to sign a contract demanding they have vaccinations to get the job.
Vaccinations are a medical intervention that must be a personal decision whether to have them or not - a properly informed and voluntary decision without pressure, coercion, manipulation...or mandates.
Pharma have maxxed out the children’s market with their HUGE number of mandated shots.
They can add more - and they will.
But they aim to do the same to the HUGE adult market. They plan to sell all these artificial mRNA shots they’re developing globally....
Could it possibly be that the major investors in all our four major banks are the likes of Blackrock, Vanguard et al - all working for n behalf of WEF and depopulation agenda?
Black Rock is on the WEF board.
Larry Fink, the Chairman and CEO of BlackRock is on the World Economic Forum's Board of Trustees: https://www.weforum.org/about/leadership-and-governance/
It's also interesting to consider that the World Economic Forum says it "provides a global, impartial and not-for-profit platform for meaningful connection between stakeholders to establish trust, and build initiatives for cooperation and progress".
https://www.weforum.org/about/world-economic-forum/#:~:text=The%20World%20Economic%20Forum%20is,initiatives%20for%20cooperation%20and%20progress.
'Not for profit'...
«Stakeholders».
WEF-speak for «ruthless billionaire».
https://rumble.com/v2e45mm-who-owns-australian-banks-the-answers-might-surprise-you...-less-than-6-min.html
Spot a n and most of these banks cross own the smaller banks . We were with Bank of Melbourne when Westpac did a hostile takeover. We had previously had bad dealings with Westpac. They promised repeatedly they would honour all contacts held by BOM customers, they didn’t and breached the home loan contract giving all the equity to my former partner They had this unspoken arrangement where they gave people “preferred customer” status. That is if one partner had held their income potential, they felt free to breach contracts knowing full well the other could not afford the legal battle. They left me mentally and financially broken.
You a not alone. www.bankvictims.com list many more, thousands I suspect. One local man and his wife lost everything, a million dollar business, the buildings and their home as well all with the assistance of CBA managers it would seem. The bank people ignored court orders to produce documents as evidence. Problem is this man and his wife thought they could deal in rights and justice and trusted lawyers to represent them which even the best most honorable lawyer and/or barrister cannot do without busting their oath and insurance bonds. Nor can the judges for the same reasons. Sorry to hear of your troubles.
All in commerce is the only way and settle before the court - its a corporation too.
For a trained nurse I made a pretty good lawyer. First I argued back and forth through the Banking Ombudsman- he was an ex bank employee. I got admissions in writing that they had indeed breached the contract. But the bank refused to settle, and the ombudsman had no power to compel them to. ( totally fake pretend organisation). Then I was dragged into the Supreme Court, again I did all my own legal work, while searching for some sort of legal help. Three weeks before the court date a lawyer came on board through LIV ( vic legal assoc) then three days before a barrister. By then because of a feral divorce and other complex issues I was mentally broken- I didn’t attend court. I received a call telling me I’d won but the bank was appealing the following Monday. On that day I was told the judgment was overturned and I had to comply with a long list of demands, and if I didn’t do so promptly I would be jailed for contempt of court. I kept requesting the paperwork, in my mental state at the time I complied. When I finally saw the paperwork, turns out the master of the Supreme Court found the bank had a case to answer. I also remember the barrister in my one meeting telling me he had the same arrangement with his ex-wife, note ex- wife and the bank had never seen a need to get her signature. Conflict of interest much! . I suspect a significant number of the judiciary has the same conflict. The average person is playing against a stacked deck. I also don’t remember any of this in the banking royal commission.
Many years ago I was offered a job I wanted & the company asked for a clear chest X-ray. I thought it was bizarre but I didn’t mind so I got one.
No way I’d do that now! Radiation is not lung-friendly....
“The threat is to financially cripple people if they refuse the Covid injections, to intimidate them into compliance.”
Yes - a “known side effect” of not taking the vaccine.
Great post!
I feel that there is something in those vaccines that the elite desperately want to be in our bodies - tracking?
I read somewhere that there is a sequence of codons in the mRNA that that codes for the site that CRISPR uses to break and insert DNA. That makes me wonder if this was only part two of a three-part bioweapon. 1. Cause fear and sickness, 2. Cause damage, death, and prime survivors for future genetic modification by adding this site to their DNA 3. Follow up with another shot containing DNA for the final desired gene modifications.
Well, I wouldn't put it passed them to do this. There is definitely a very dark agenda behind all this. Create one pandemic after another and come up with a solution which is not really a solution, but a poison to get rid of you.
To quote someone who wrote:- "I am not stuck in the system; the system is stuck in me. I may choose to openly declare my sovereignty. I can choose to just say No."
Mahatma Gandhi said much the same, "No", he pointed out is the strongest word in any language and it is anything BUT passive to say No and stand in your claim. .
Gandhi knew and wrote about the vaccinations being dangerous and the theory nonsensical..
Wise man was Gandhi. Vaccines are Turtles all the way down as there is actually no scientific basis. And the mRNA jabs are not vaccines at all until the definition of what a vaccine is was changed as it was in early 2020 or there about in order to include this different technology. Maybe a message in there perhaps?
What transpired in March 2020 onwards is a MONUMENTAL SATANIC EVIL CRIME. I visited my local Westpac branch regularly and I was polite to the tellers empathising with them. One of them was very upset with me because she was forced to wear a mask and could hardly breathe and she was clearly under distress. Anyway the tellers told me they had to get the jabs to keep their job which they all did, and wear masks at the same time, and a few months later after they were jabbed how many times, the branch closed and they lost their jobs and livelihoods. I asked them if the vaccine is protecting you, why are you wearing a mask - and they came up with their script answer to protect people. Of course, I felt for their predicament and felt for them deeply. The central bankers, the big banks in Australia I believe have the identical major shareholder owners. The banks are criminal institutions. It was the government and the propaganda media with corporate complicity, forcing these poisons, and it is force, it is force. People can't go to work unless they get the poison and more poisons on top? This is force. That the covid10 was formulated in labs prior to March 2020, and the scamdemic was planned. They want the issue to go away, whilst people die, get cancers, auto immune diseases, even mad -cow disease, skin disease, neurological conditions, what not.... and they continue to push the jabs and new jabs. What a monumental crime. This is not new - just the scale of it.
Did you know the FDA has already given the green light to bird flu vaccine in 2019.
Oh look! An article from 2008...
Australia approves CSL's H5N1 vaccine: https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/avian-influenza-bird-flu/australia-approves-csls-h5n1-vaccine
It's the 'pre-pandemic' industry!
Also see re another 'strain'...
CSL Seqirus Announces U.S. Government Award to Manufacture and Clinically Assess Influenza A(H5N8) Pre-Pandemic Vaccine:
https://www.cslseqirus.us/news/csl-seqirus-us-government-award-to-manufacture-and-assess-influenza-a-h5n8-pre-pandemic-vaccine
That is probably going to be pushed to be the next big pandemic. They engineer these things in their level 4 labs by doing gain of function research and make synthetic copies because these are easier to make on a large scale. It is all poison, and then they have a so-called antidote called a vaccine, which really isn't an antidote but another poison to drive the last nail in the coffin. They are all insane in my book.
https://rumble.com/v4onqqu-vsrf-live-122-our-food-under-attack.html
Jan, see my response to Julie Pettiford.
Ah, yes, I see they are well prepared for the next ONE, whatever it may be. Strange how they always know before hand, even years, that a certain virus will become a pandemic. It's that revolving door again between the pharma groups. government departments, health authorities, WEF and WHO, to make money out of us while slowly killing us. What a wonderful business model.
It is genocide. It is that factual. Mike Yeadon ex Pfizer vice president and ex Senior Pfizer Scientist has said from the start of the scamdemic, that the vaccines are deliberately designed to harm.
Many more people are aware of the problems with the vax
It should not be as easy for these power crazy people to do this
They must be stopped.
I don't understand why there is not currently, large numbers of (former) bank employees, suing the bank, either for unfare dismissal, or forced administration of a medical intervention ie assault & battery.?
I'm mystified too.
Why haven't the courts being able to give any protection to people from mandated medical interventions?!
Large legal firms are rubbing their collective hands with glee as they announce massive law suits in the very near future, imo.
My doctor gave me a “doctor’s note” - the usual kind. My work place would not accept it. Went back to my doctor, he told me sorry can’t give an official form exemption. When I argued, he told me to go get a second opinion. So I lost my job. 🤷🏻♀️
Rita, there should not be 'exemptions' for vaccination, as people should be giving their voluntary informed consent to this medical intervention, or refusing it if they so wish.
See for example my email to Health Minister Mark Butler: Doctor Mark Hobart suspended for issuing Covid-19 vaccination exemptions...but vaccination exemptions should not exist! https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2023/11/doctor-mark-hobart-suspended-for-issuing-covid-19-vaccination-exemptions.pdf
Ex Doctor I hope.👍
I would like to say the Australian government needs to get real and tell employers and other would-be dictators that they cannot legally force people to take a vaccine. But of course they will never do that because in reality they do not believe in ANY human rights - as evidenced during the pandemic. Not the right to freedom of movement, or freedom of assembly, or freedom of speech, or freedom to visit the sick in hospitals, or freedom to receive treatment as determined by one's (uncoerced and unbrainwashed) doctor. What governments believe is that you, the citizen, have no rights other than those graciously granted to you by the authorities. If this is not tyranny, what is?
The fact is that we Australians are living today in a proto-totalitarian state. The surveillance systems are being built as we speak, like invisible prison walls, slowly rising. Digital ID, which most people DO NOT WANT is being imposed inexorably. You cannot make a doctor's appointment or do many other normal things now without stating your Date of Birth - once considered private information. You may as well get it tattooed on your forehead, although that will not be necessary either, because the authorities are implementing Chinese communist-style facial recognition systems as fast as they can go. Cash is being taken away, so that all your purchases can be monitored. The banks are already starting to assert their new-found right to refuse service to anyone whose opinions they do not like (known in the popular media as 'debanking').
The deluded useful idiots running the Australian health system will inevitably go along with forced vaccination next time. Just remember the bizarre, mindless, hysterical outbursts delivered by premiers and senior health officials deriding, insulting, abusing and threatening people who did want the vaccine last time round. These people have not gone away. They are gearing up for Disease X.
Also Stephen, some other angles to consider...e.g. intrusion on privacy, and businesses being fined over 'unvaxxed workers'.
Consider:
- ‘Terrible mistake’ could send execs to jail over vaccine certificates: https://www.afr.com/technology/terrible-mistake-could-send-execs-to-jail-over-vaccine-certificates-20211015-p590am
- Victorian businesses face up to $10,904 in fines over unvaxxed workers from Friday, 12 October 2021: https://www.smartcompany.com.au/coronavirus/victorian-vacine-mandate-businesses-fines-unvaxxed-workers/
Time to go ballistic I suggest...
Stephen, re the Australian Government...
I have a letter from the Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care, dated 17 November 2022, which states: "Informed consent should be obtained for every COVID-19 vaccination, as per usual consent procedures for other vaccinations."
https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2022/11/mc22-018819-signed-highlighted-1.pdf
That's confirmation from the Australian Government...the same duplicitous Australian Government that knew very well that vaccination mandates had been imposed across the country.
Let's try and be proactive and effective in getting accountability for this matter. Are you writing to your state and federal MPs?
Keening and wailing gets us nowhere, we have to try and take effective action.
Stephen, I believe they are just waiting for the WHO to vote on their Treaty and IHR amendments and then they can double down on us little people even more harshly the next time, which is just around the corner. Our present premier in WA was not elected because he took over from Mark McGowan who stepped down, but the way he has been talking lately about what he is going to do in the next pandemic should have everyone worried.
He is going to need that army to get a lot of us to comply. A lot more than last time.
Rewind; were the "leader's" of these organisations & others invited to the National Cabinet to give their commitment to the government(s) & possibly received an inducement for their cooperation? Only one way to find out.
Great question Roc!
We so need to know what was going on in 'National Cabinet'...
National cabinet was the coverup- 30 years embargo on cabinet papers. COAG was transparent!
What is needed Julie, imo, is an massive groundswell of support by ALL fair minded Australian's to DEMAND OUR documents UNREDACTED. ALL of the answers are there.
That’s unlikely, while we were sleeping, governments have progressively been building more and more on NDA’s and commercial in confidence surrounding contracts where they are spending your money. Simultaneously they have been giving so much power to unelected bureaucrats to sign international agreements and n our behalf without public or parliamentary scrutiny. We are in a situation where a bureaucrat signs WHO treaties and have control over internet censorship. The list is very long. We elect them and they do as they please.
Why is it unlikely?
We have to demand transparency and accountability.
Fantastic 'hypothetical', Elizabeth. One which no doubt played out in reality in thousands of consultation rooms across Australia in late 2021-early 2022.
As a former nurse, my answer to your question is absolutely, unequivocally, the doctor (nurse, pharmacists, other 'vaccinator') must not proceed. The person is clearly not giving consent, and I would also argue this extends to people who didn't necessarily say "I don't want the vaccine", but expressed any concern regarding being subject to a mandate, or simply showed visible signs of distress (crying, vomiting, etc.).
Flowing on from these individual interactions, healthcare professionals should have been publicly vocal about these grossly unethical policies and the effects they were seeing on patients. Yes, I know they had job and livelihood concerns of their own, but these professions are held to a higher account and operating at this level of self-interest is unacceptable.
I am utterly horrified at what has unfolded over the last few years, and I am so deeply sorry that so many people have been psychologically and/or physically harmed.
Thanks Laine, as you say, the vaccinator - doctor, nurse, pharmacist, etc - must NOT proceed if the person is clearly not giving consent.
But they did.
This means NO VALID CONSENT.
You're right; there have been so many breaches, it is a disgrace.
It's an unmitigated disaster for the medical 'profession' and others, when the scope of this scandal is exposed.
Couldn't agree more.
I lost my job of 10 years in the W.A. resources Sector, for Asking 'TOO MANY' questions on 'Safety' concerns, per the CONVID-19 Jab Manufacturers OWN Safety Data Sheets [SDS or MSDS - Material Safety Data Sheet](Pfizer/Moderna 2020/21 - In plain Black & White, for EVERYONE to see, how Dodgy this U.S. DoD/DARPA/'G' network interactives 'JABS' - NOT 'Vaccine' by Standard definition- Were!!), And 'Holes' therein in 'Test results' & UNknown Outcomes 'IDENTIFIED' by said pHARMa's SDS>MANDATORY 'Testing & Trials' Data per Same CONVID 'Products'- 'REQUIRED' Before 'Release on/into Open Public 'Markets'. Copies of ALL said SDS, WERE passed onto our HSEQs & Management teams by myself, whilst still employed, with ZERO investigation/ response, on what I considered to be A, 'Major cause for concern > Co-workers Health & Safety, & Possible serious incidents on/In Heavy Machinery Operations- relevent to The Mining industry @ Large. So much for 'Safety in the Workplace!!'Note; Please Do not get me started on Govt 'Oversight & OFFICIAL Watchdogging Agencies = THE 'Rubber Stamp & Pass after reading [If at all, OR, Non understanding of said informations therein\, of Corporate Fantasy & Fictional Data.'
With even this info in mind, per the Official CONVID-19, 'Exercise/Exorcise' Jab SDSs, let's move on to Pfizer's OWN 'ATTACHMENT A' warnings, sent to ALL 'Health Providers' & Consumers - Mmm Consumers. I wonder if Your Previous mentioned 'Medical professionals', AND, Including Associated Govt TGA, CMOs, Premiers & Cabinet, Vaccine Commandants, Pharma 'Funded' Institutes such as the Doherty Institute which 'Advise' ATAGI, Were M.I.A. for 3 Plus Years, whilst THIS Circulated - AND STILL?? Sorry folks, don't have the PDF on Attachment A - Will have to relate 'long hand'. All 'Emphasis' is Pharma's OWN!
ATTACHMENT A.
Important Information for Health providers and Consumers. Australia
Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine COMIRNATY BNT162b2.
SAFETY
* WARNING; THIS VACCINE MAY CAUSE SERIOUS ILLNESS AND DEATH.
* This vaccine is new and experimental and has not been fully validated for safety and efficacy.
* This vaccine has not been safety- tested for medium term and long term side-effects.
* This vaccine has not been tested for genetic impacts.
* If you are pregnant or breastfeeding, immune comprimised, otherwise ill, frail or taking other medications, or an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander, you should not take this vaccine.
EFFICACY
* This vaccine may not prevent infection or give lasting protection from infection.
* This vaccine may not prevent viral transmission.
* This vaccine will not reduce symptoms.
* Before taking this vaccine, you should carefully weigh the risks and benefits against the risks associated with infections, including Mortality and morbidity data.
* You should carefully consider whether this vaccine is right for you in all circumstances.
AppaRentLie, ALL of the Above 'Medical Cabal' AND The Fedral Political Circle, AND State Premiers, ALL, must 'KNOW' More than the CONVID-19 'VAXX' Manufacturers, to STILL push ahead with 'Mandates' And the 'SAFE & EFFECTIVE' - NOT, LIE!! 'Safe & Effective' = HOW, BY ANY METRIC, With the above 'Statements' by Corporate Pharma, IS, that at all 'POSSIBLE'?
Ask TOO MANY relevant 'Safety' questions, Reward= One gets the Sack! So much for 'Got You & Your Mates Back' = MORE Corporate 'Box Ticking'!
I Thought 'Attachment A' content- if not seen before, may be some extra intel, relevant per conversation.
Wellness to All - John D.
Just imagine if enought people stop "believing" and started to say "no thank you". There is no way an employer can afford to lose a hugh percentage of their trained work force over night. Oh how I wish for more vaccine hesitancy!!!
Yes Jack - and we need the vaccinators to be aware of their obligation to obtain voluntary informed consent for vaccination...and to find out they DO NOT have specific indemnity for administering the COVID-19 injections. I'll do a substack on this soon.
Canada was another one that went over the tips of its skis. Everywhere mandated the jabs. So if you said no, it was no job, no unemployment benefit, no welfare, you couldn't go anywhere without showing a vaccine passport...
Not the most 8 months of fun in my life - but I knew I couldn't take the vaccines.
So...
And soon they'll probably lock us down for climate change and bird flu...
Let's pursue accountability whiskeys...
Love this. If you attend a doctor, nurse or any other regulated profession and tell them that you are being mandated to take a medical treatment the ONLY response should be "I can't provide this medical treatment to you under these circumstances and I would like your permission to report the person forcing you to take it to the authorities, for attempted assault"
Bingo…that is the right answer…
"I can't provide this medical treatment to you under these circumstances and I would like your permission to report the person forcing you to take it to the authorities, for attempted assault"
Ever hear of that happening?
Never
Our family GP gave my then 20 year old and only-just turned 18 year old a “consent” form they had to sign stating they agreed with the procedure and confirmed they weren’t allergic to any of the ingredients in the “product”. No ingredients were listed, obviously. What a ludicrous situation.
Exactly Jude, as you say 'a ludicrous situation'.
Also a very serious situation, as the vaccinators haven't been obtaining VALID CONSENT.
It's such a farce! It's illogical to maintain that people should take a dangerous gene therapy that protects no one from anything, & likely endangers health & may kill the recipient! What is the benefit to the employer? They fire longterm employees who refuse, & will lose a good portion of their jabbed employees as the jab damage disables some & suddenly kills others! I'm not sure how to get through to the tone deaf. Some are idiots, some are just plain evil.
You know what I'd like to know Anna Marie?
What motivated these employers to demand their employees be vaccinated?
Was it entirely off their own bat?
Or was some other entity orchestrating this?
Exactly, there's money or favors changing hands somewhere for so many big businesses to automatically be in lockstep with corrupted gov't, or is it the depopulation plan, replacing workers with robots & slave labor from the replacement migrants, some of whom think they're coming here for a better life? It's like we're living in BIZARO world or Twilight Zone.
God will have the last word.
Have a think about this email Anna Marie, sent in September 2021...
Mandated COVID-19 vaccination and News Corp Australia - Michael Miller,
Executive Chairman: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2021/09/mandated-covid-19-vaccination-and-news-corp-australia.pdf
Excellent letter!
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
Is a way of reducing the number of their employees. Banks are closing branches and reducing staff. If they refuse the vaccine there are no redundancy payments just severance? It looks very dodgy to be insisting on vaccines unless it is in their contracts or they are looking for ways to get rid of staff. Or are the people who run these banks just stupid?
Interesting thought Jillian!