6 Comments
User's avatar
Dr Rosemary Faire's avatar

Thanks for your work to keep rattling the bars about the informed consent issue. I would suggest that the two words share equal value in the phrase. The ability to be informed rests on the trustworthiness of our sources of inform-ation.

Many doctors might believe they are informed because they trust expert vaccinologists, immunologists and virologists. Many of those experts believe they are informed because they trust the mythologies that were fed to them as students. And of course, many of the public and politicians believe they are informed because they trust their ABC,etc, and the medical advisers paraded before them.

It is not an easy task to be informed. Even the dissidents in the medical freedom leadership are not necessarily trustworthy, as there are always those who provide us with limited hangouts and false dichotomies that obscure rather than illuminate.

Psychological operations deliberately devolve being truly informed, prior to consent, into pragmatism and resignation.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Hart's avatar

Thanks for your comment Rosemary.

There is much to tease out...

For example the expectation that vaccinating practitioners will follow the National Immunisation Program Schedule without question.

AHPRA has made it clear it will not accept any questioning of vaccination by practitioners...such would be considered 'anti-vaccination'...

This is extremely problematic because it means the practitioners administering the vaccine products aren't allowed to question them...this has devastating consequences for valid voluntary informed consent.

It's clear I'm pretty frustrated with the vaccinating practitioners for collaborating with coercion and mandates, and not obtaining valid consent, but at the same time it must be acknowledged the practitioners themselves are effectively coerced to support the vaccination status quo, although they should have stood up to this, as this violates their duty to obtain valid consent.

We need to crack this open, break through the suppression of dissent which has been in place for years.

Expand full comment
Amat's avatar

Dr Malik on informed consent stated "You need to have the right to say, I don't want anything. I just want to be left alone." No one was able to refuse what happened during the fake pandemic of 2020 because the government did not ask for our consent, all of it up to the vaccines was an erosion of our rights to say no. Mandatory vaccines was a continuation of the governments drive to make us submit to what they considered was their authoritarian "right" to invade our private personal lives and it progressed from stripping us of our personal autonomy to coercion to have substances injected into our body. Personal consent from 2020 disappeared in nearly every aspect of our lives because the government cited an emergency and their draconian response to the fake emergency was for the "greater good". Personal informed consent is one of the cornerstones of freedom in a civilised society but apparently in our societies it can be taken from us by governments when they wish to.

Expand full comment
Michael Weigang's avatar

G'morning Amat

I know for a fact that a many were actually force-quacksinated , aka poisoned and with it maimed or even killed , I am at odds to say which was worse.

Most of the population had a choice though , do you agree ?

Whatever consequences a "NO" would have had for couples , families , that pain evoked would have undoubtetly led to a road less travelled , the TRUTH would have been the guide to bare the teeth at 'our fake corporation , aka government , the WHO , the UN , the police , which should be the Constabluary and the military , which swore an OATH to defend US ...!!!

I may remind you of Morisson's lovely denigration : "we just have to get the SHEEP through the gate...Karma will deal with him !!!

Now that most Australians figured that a live means nothing more than a blood sacrifice to those up there who practice in the dark arts , heroes like Elizabeth and many others have to work twice as hard to progress on the road to true JUSTICE.

To ask for informed consent about a product where the involved producers know upfront that lives will be lost and unimaginable suffering will occur is nothing short of asking for the death penalty for themselves , they counted on people uneducated about the trust and the consequences - that is heinous

Until we rise as ONE or they are taken out by a miracle they will try to exterminate us , but I know their days are counted !!!

MAY THAT BE REAL SOON !!! MAY THAT BE REAL SOON !!! MAY THAT BE REAL SOON !!!

Expand full comment
Anthony Pearce's avatar

The writing of legislation [Western Australia, 2014?] ... that gives the right to police to enter one's home to administer such poisons, under force... over the many years prior to the Scamdemic indicates a long term plan to conduct said Scamdemic.

Expand full comment
Lee Kelley's avatar

When will those professing their faith deal with vaccination and those they glorify that push the shot see they are worshipping idols. When they dismiss those speaking the truth by calling spreaders of mis and dis information is nothing more then bearing a false witness not to mention at least complicity to commit murder willing joining those pushing the shots instead of looking at this monstrous lie and saying it’s Truth. None of it is love as they sit in the Churches declaring we know how it ends. Scandalous behavior when standing together with Love will stop it all. Courage or Complicity? Courage standing together brings Love, hope and Truth. Complicity represents Idols, false witness and murder everything but Love. The Truth would set everyone Free.

By the way your work is setting people free and much needed. Thank you.

Expand full comment