Excellent article, Elizabeth! The decline in both mortality and ethical behavior among those in positions of trust is truly devastating. Politicians, medical and scientific professionals, police, journalists, the judiciary, and leaders in both the public and business sectors are largely complicit in this severe erosion of moral standards. While there are still principled individuals within these ranks, they are unfortunately too few to reverse the downward trend. Informed consent is the crucial difference between living in a free, open society and being reduced to a subject of slavery
Doctors have never been good in the US. You might find a random doc that uses critical thinking and a questioning attitude applied to their patient’s best interest.
But to the vast majority the medical profession is about obtaining and maintaining a wealthy lifestyle.
I think there’s a universal entrapment by income stream. Humans rely on income streams to maintain their status quo. So if you have a wife and children and home and lifestyle commensurate with your income stream, you are trapped by the dictates that enable the income.
They say you can quit and find another income stream, but that’s not realistic.
This was exposed by the Covid mandates: 'paradoxically' the most compliant were members of the medical profession etc. (Teachers, nurses, police etc less so.) Those who have more have "more to lose" - and don't realize that compliance comes at a price (far beyond vaccine injuries).
I was pretty shocked by the way that Covid brought out the latent authoritarianism of many scholars, journalists, politicians and others, and also by the passive sheep-like behaviour of the lumpen proles.
As for doctors, consider this:
"A study of doctors in Scotland with experience of whistleblowing in the NHS has revealed “shocking” repercussions including bullying by managers, being blacklisted, marginalised and having their sanity questioned.
An online survey of BMA Scotland members, which attracted 436 responses, found that that vast majority (87%) of medics had encountered challenges when speaking up about safety concerns.
Scientific references to my statements can be found on the homepages of 'Aletheia – our Swiss network of doctors and scientists for proportionality', of the 'Corman-Drosten Review Report', and of 'Doctors for Covid Ethics', all of which I am a member, and on my simple homepage, which I had created after having been banned from social media.
And so it should be with Social Workers, Psychologists, Psychiatrists and other professionals. If I’m working with a client in crisis, I don’t owe his/her family, neighbours or my other clients a duty of care when determining what services I’m providing to that client. The idea that we suddenly have a duty of care for the “greater good” rather than our own individual client is preposterous!
The same principles should apply to all service industries. The medical and financial industries being at the forefront. Governments are meant to provide services for the benefit of the people... and not dictate our submission to their dictat's.
There are important social and structural problems preventing a return to ethical medical practice. Number one is the corruption of TGA and AHPRA by Pharma influence and the appointment of personnel steeped in the socialist ethos and Woke ideology of the public service. Number two is the degraded status of most medical practitioners from that of independent professionals in former times to the positions they now occupy in hospitals and corporatised medical clinics. Number three is a mechanical mindset inculcated by medical schools, and reinforced in the medical workplace, which sees diagnosis as an exercise in ordering tests, and treatment as prescribing according to semi-official 'guidelines'. Number four is that modern socialist governments increasingly see education and health as their province, because these areas provide acceptable ways of controlling and manipulating populations. Consequently people expect medical practice to conform to government agendas and social expectations. This is evident in areas such as homosexual lifestyles, abortion, euthanasia and transgender medicine - areas that ethical practitioners of old would not have touched with a bargepole. Ultimately the profession is going to have to decide whether it will continue to be enslaved by these forces, or will demand a return to its old independence.
Every point, valid. And the decision you refer to is even larger & more important than just the medical profession, massively significant as that is.
It seems the entire world is poised at a tipping point of ... everything. Everything that most people believe in is being challenged, at every level. The structure, the sanity of our existence is being thrown into question. And by whom one may ask?
The notion of civilisation appears to be at risk of failing and turning into something unrecognisable. Slavery indeed.
Again, who are these forces out to enslave us, and why? When in a war, a battle of survival, one needs to know the enemy. Why aren't intelligent minds focused on this critical question?
Why aren't intelligent minds focused on this critical question?
Because "intelligent mids" come from the institutions owned by the would be slavers. They wouldn't be "intelligent mids" if they didnt self censor and conform,. they'd be out on their backside, conspiracy theorists without a voice. If you want to hear genuine intelligent minds asking genuinely critical questions you'll have to venture away from the slaver's institutions, universities, think tanks, media etc.
Executive Intelligence Review and the Australian Citizens Party have been writing about this slow upending and enslavement for decades but you can also read about it form authors like Anton Chaitken, Matt Ehret, Robert Ingraham, Richard Poe, John Coleman, David Talbot, Carroll Quigley, and many many others. Its not a secret. Its the open conspiracy. They (the hereditary oligarchy, a financiers liberal order) have been slowly bending history, science, medicine, finance, energy, economics and education for generations to get the point now, where they believe they can (again) attempt a global coup. Why? unchallenged control of everything with a compliant slave race. Why covid and a digitised biosecurity state? a mythology to believe in, so you willingly accept clandestine genetic experimentation for yourself and your kids. Why? so over time they can understand how genetic modification might allow them to live a little longer. Want to see those details? listen to Jonathan Couey.
Thanks for your comment, Ben. I 'ventured away' from the 'institutions' etc quite a while ago, and whilst I haven't read all of those you mentioned, I do follow one or two - plus others & alt sites that can be informative to the open minded.
Agree, it (the open conspiracy) isn't a secret and 'they', the 'hereditary oligarchy, the financiers liberal order' may well be, most likely are, instigators, playing their part.
But I was hoping for names, identities of this cohort.
Is it Gates, Shwartz, Zuggerburg, KC111, Fed Reserve, the Marxists who've infiltrated politics, judiciary, economics, education - and just about all leaders of Western (not just western) governments ('cept the hero in Hungary) etc etc ??
Or are they just the gofers, doing the bidding, knowingly or not, of their masters?
Who are the masters? Who or what is the hidden hand behind it all? That's my question.
PS your answer to 'why' - essentially control over a slave race - is accurate but what drives that? Deep dive 'der.
Australian Citizens Party have a bunch of history pamphlets on the their website that explains in an Australian context. (They just don't see the conspiracy in pandemics but it's the same fraud; phony scientific doctrines, just biology, not economics.) The fuedal one world government has been the goal of the British Empire since before it was British and it was Venetian. Who are they? The Crown, the Royal families, other aristocratic families, the hofjuden, the various Orders. The Gates, Zuckerbergs, Schwatzs, Bezozs, Musks are front men for Empire projects. The rabbit hole is deep.
and about what drives it.. i dont know what would cause someone to maliciously and deviously inflict on people what they have done, are doing to us. Its a subversion of knowledge so we destroy, murder and enslave ourselves. The majority of doctors believe vaccination is a critically good thing, but the biology is a lie. Its a mantra theyre taught without high fidelity understanding. And we are taught to do what they say. I think its evil beyond comprehension. I can understand people who view it as biblical good versus evil, but they are not gods and they have tried this before. They will fail this time too. A compassionate, humanist movement will win.
An excellent article as always. Mind you, I’ve come to the view that informed consent is rarely possible. Aside from informing individuals about the positive and negative consequences of a particular treatment, doctors should also consider alternative approaches which includes doing nothing. Considering that they’re obliged to follow clinical guidelines which prioritises pharmaceuticals over naturopathic approaches, a truly informed decision is rarely supported or even possible.
Valerie, re “Considering that they’re obliged to follow clinical guidelines which prioritises pharmaceuticals over naturopathic approaches…”
This is what must be challenged, the prioritisation of pharmaceuticals, and failure to obtain informed consent. This must be brought out into the light.
I enjoy your posts Elizabeth but Malik hasn't really been cancelled out of any anything. This whole health freedom space is dominated by fakes and frauds curating false arguments keeping debate away from challenging the core issues of this budding biosecurity state, which is; the biology is a lie. Take some time to listen to Jay Couey PhD. Here's a good one https://stream.gigaohm.bio/w/9AAFQnqSorhnEtYF875mxj
Elizabeth, listen to the 6 min rant of CBA boss in Aus Senate about how Australians starting to ask questions about the how's and why's of major policies and institutions governing their lives, is a threat to him. Its not unrelated.
Elizabeth, I'm bit over half way through Wall Street, Nazis and the Crimes of the Deep State. Thank you again for the link. I have read many of the referenced books and this is a really good concise summary. I think it under plays City of London (Wall St is the junior partner) and if the author were to trace back a few more generations he would detail the Nazi links to the British Empire (which it only touches in passing). Nazism wasn't a spontaneous German growth that got support from Wall St bankers and industrialists. It has deeper roots in (British) Empire oligarchy and strategy. But my comment.... Chapter 5; The Deep State explains the OSS/CIA/etc is really a war on the USA democracy, not Soviets, China etc. This is key! Though bearly recognisable today due to 250 years of Empire subversion after losing the colony, in the original USA was the self organised, fairly represented, moral basis of political economy that was THE answer to hereditary oligarchy and their slave Empire. The idea caught like wildfire around the world during mid to late 1800s. Its arguably why WW1 happened (destroy this movement) and WW2 (to establish Empire's world gov, though Hitler didnt stick to the plan) and we're still kind of in WW2, just with a changed focus to slower tactics of institutional subversion and psychological control. If we don't get that original USA back in the current USA (we came close in Australia with the early Labor movement but Australia has never had the freedom and citizen protections of self organised political economy), the Five Eyes, Europe, Japan and many others are likely doomed to hundreds, maybe a 1000 years, of oligarchy dictatorship (with a democratic veneer) that, at the very least we know from COVID will involve genetic experimentation, but likely be much darker than the Nazis. Read political history detailed by Matt Ehret, Anton Chaitken, Executive Intelligence Review and the Australian Citizens Party. Believe it for not the fight for a People's Bank is much the same fight as the one for informed consent. The scientific lies of pandemic biology are fundamentally the same as the scientific lies of neoliberal economics. What's at hand is so big, so ingrained and so fundamental to how our society is presently organised.
The ‘health freedom space’ is such a tricky space, so many competing personalities now on the scene.
I started investigating vaccination policy in 2008, specifically pet vaccination at first, after one of my dogs became very ill and was put down after what I subsequently discovered was gross over-vaccination every year. And this led me to questioning human vaccination.
Before Covid, it was practically impossible to question vaccination, an absolute no go area. But now the Covid debacle is helping open up this area to other critical thinkers.
There’s a lot of newcomers on the scene, with titles, ‘doctor’, ‘professor’, and they take up a lot of the oxygen, but how many are controlled opposition?
I think Ahmad has done great work with his podcasts. It’s his own voyage of discovery and he’s helping to share many different perspectives, including offering me the opportunity twice to chat about vaccination. This was unheard of for me before Covid.
Ahmad has lost his career as a surgeon, it’s no joke. I think he’s sincere in questioning the narrative. I first heard from him over two years ago, after he saw my BMJ rapid response published in March 2020, see: Is it ethical to impede access to natural immunity? The case of SARS-CoV2: https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.m1089/rr-6
Certainly there aren’t many other doctors like Ahmad willing to speak out.
Here we are five years into this thing, it’s unbloodybelievable they are still trying to pull this scam. Way past time it was all exposed and blown sky high!
It was Couey who showed me the deception in the social media movement, with all of its vigorous debate in a very limited spectrum. Few of them go after the right questions. That the biology is a lie (and its not the same as "no viruses"). If you listen Couey present, he is qualified, was intimately involved and has integrity, honestly you rarely see, I promise you, you'll see the Maliks and many others very differently, for what they are; protecting the base narrative of the biosecurity state with vigorous debate in topics that won't derail it. David's book looks great. Thankyou for the tip
"Doctors and other medical professionals are subject to punishment by captured regulatory bodies such as the GMC in the UK, and Ahpra in Australia, if they question prescriptive medical ‘guidelines’ - e.g. vaccination ‘recommendations’ which have morphed into mandates in countries such as the UK, Australia, the United States, Canada, New Zealand, and elsewhere."
The Five Eyes... up to their necks where the Covid Crimes are concerned.
Agree. "Doctors and other medical professionals are subject to punishment by captured regulatory bodies such as the GMC in the UK, and Ahpra in Australia . . . "
They Need to to Cut The Strings From Their Puppet Masters. Otherwise, They Are Forever Indentured aka Criminal Subordinates to Their Masters.
Excellent article, Elizabeth! The decline in both mortality and ethical behavior among those in positions of trust is truly devastating. Politicians, medical and scientific professionals, police, journalists, the judiciary, and leaders in both the public and business sectors are largely complicit in this severe erosion of moral standards. While there are still principled individuals within these ranks, they are unfortunately too few to reverse the downward trend. Informed consent is the crucial difference between living in a free, open society and being reduced to a subject of slavery
Spot on Gaz!
“Informed consent is the crucial difference between living in a free, open society and being reduced to a subject of slavery”
Doctors have never been good in the US. You might find a random doc that uses critical thinking and a questioning attitude applied to their patient’s best interest.
But to the vast majority the medical profession is about obtaining and maintaining a wealthy lifestyle.
Same in Australia: their wealth and "social status" is all they care about.
I think there’s a universal entrapment by income stream. Humans rely on income streams to maintain their status quo. So if you have a wife and children and home and lifestyle commensurate with your income stream, you are trapped by the dictates that enable the income.
They say you can quit and find another income stream, but that’s not realistic.
"Universal entrapment" is exactly right.
This was exposed by the Covid mandates: 'paradoxically' the most compliant were members of the medical profession etc. (Teachers, nurses, police etc less so.) Those who have more have "more to lose" - and don't realize that compliance comes at a price (far beyond vaccine injuries).
Material prosperity is dangerous to freedom.
I was pretty shocked by the way that Covid brought out the latent authoritarianism of many scholars, journalists, politicians and others, and also by the passive sheep-like behaviour of the lumpen proles.
As for doctors, consider this:
"A study of doctors in Scotland with experience of whistleblowing in the NHS has revealed “shocking” repercussions including bullying by managers, being blacklisted, marginalised and having their sanity questioned.
An online survey of BMA Scotland members, which attracted 436 responses, found that that vast majority (87%) of medics had encountered challenges when speaking up about safety concerns.
Fears around disciplinary procedures and a detrimental impact on their career were raised as issues by potential whistleblowers. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/24549518.nhs-whistleblowers-marginalised-blacklisted-gaslit/?ref=ebln&nid=1220&block=article_block_a&u=286fe4051aa0a26108828c926576a42b&date=300824
And in Switzerland. The excellent cardiologist Dr Thomas Binder
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/swiss-doctor-locked-away-in-mental-asylum-for-questioning-covid-lockdowns/
More …
Scientific references to my statements can be found on the homepages of 'Aletheia – our Swiss network of doctors and scientists for proportionality', of the 'Corman-Drosten Review Report', and of 'Doctors for Covid Ethics', all of which I am a member, and on my simple homepage, which I had created after having been banned from social media.
https://www.thomasbinder.ch/
And so it should be with Social Workers, Psychologists, Psychiatrists and other professionals. If I’m working with a client in crisis, I don’t owe his/her family, neighbours or my other clients a duty of care when determining what services I’m providing to that client. The idea that we suddenly have a duty of care for the “greater good” rather than our own individual client is preposterous!
The same principles should apply to all service industries. The medical and financial industries being at the forefront. Governments are meant to provide services for the benefit of the people... and not dictate our submission to their dictat's.
There are important social and structural problems preventing a return to ethical medical practice. Number one is the corruption of TGA and AHPRA by Pharma influence and the appointment of personnel steeped in the socialist ethos and Woke ideology of the public service. Number two is the degraded status of most medical practitioners from that of independent professionals in former times to the positions they now occupy in hospitals and corporatised medical clinics. Number three is a mechanical mindset inculcated by medical schools, and reinforced in the medical workplace, which sees diagnosis as an exercise in ordering tests, and treatment as prescribing according to semi-official 'guidelines'. Number four is that modern socialist governments increasingly see education and health as their province, because these areas provide acceptable ways of controlling and manipulating populations. Consequently people expect medical practice to conform to government agendas and social expectations. This is evident in areas such as homosexual lifestyles, abortion, euthanasia and transgender medicine - areas that ethical practitioners of old would not have touched with a bargepole. Ultimately the profession is going to have to decide whether it will continue to be enslaved by these forces, or will demand a return to its old independence.
Every point, valid. And the decision you refer to is even larger & more important than just the medical profession, massively significant as that is.
It seems the entire world is poised at a tipping point of ... everything. Everything that most people believe in is being challenged, at every level. The structure, the sanity of our existence is being thrown into question. And by whom one may ask?
The notion of civilisation appears to be at risk of failing and turning into something unrecognisable. Slavery indeed.
Again, who are these forces out to enslave us, and why? When in a war, a battle of survival, one needs to know the enemy. Why aren't intelligent minds focused on this critical question?
Why aren't intelligent minds focused on this critical question?
Because "intelligent mids" come from the institutions owned by the would be slavers. They wouldn't be "intelligent mids" if they didnt self censor and conform,. they'd be out on their backside, conspiracy theorists without a voice. If you want to hear genuine intelligent minds asking genuinely critical questions you'll have to venture away from the slaver's institutions, universities, think tanks, media etc.
Executive Intelligence Review and the Australian Citizens Party have been writing about this slow upending and enslavement for decades but you can also read about it form authors like Anton Chaitken, Matt Ehret, Robert Ingraham, Richard Poe, John Coleman, David Talbot, Carroll Quigley, and many many others. Its not a secret. Its the open conspiracy. They (the hereditary oligarchy, a financiers liberal order) have been slowly bending history, science, medicine, finance, energy, economics and education for generations to get the point now, where they believe they can (again) attempt a global coup. Why? unchallenged control of everything with a compliant slave race. Why covid and a digitised biosecurity state? a mythology to believe in, so you willingly accept clandestine genetic experimentation for yourself and your kids. Why? so over time they can understand how genetic modification might allow them to live a little longer. Want to see those details? listen to Jonathan Couey.
Thanks for your comment, Ben. I 'ventured away' from the 'institutions' etc quite a while ago, and whilst I haven't read all of those you mentioned, I do follow one or two - plus others & alt sites that can be informative to the open minded.
Agree, it (the open conspiracy) isn't a secret and 'they', the 'hereditary oligarchy, the financiers liberal order' may well be, most likely are, instigators, playing their part.
But I was hoping for names, identities of this cohort.
Is it Gates, Shwartz, Zuggerburg, KC111, Fed Reserve, the Marxists who've infiltrated politics, judiciary, economics, education - and just about all leaders of Western (not just western) governments ('cept the hero in Hungary) etc etc ??
Or are they just the gofers, doing the bidding, knowingly or not, of their masters?
Who are the masters? Who or what is the hidden hand behind it all? That's my question.
PS your answer to 'why' - essentially control over a slave race - is accurate but what drives that? Deep dive 'der.
Australian Citizens Party have a bunch of history pamphlets on the their website that explains in an Australian context. (They just don't see the conspiracy in pandemics but it's the same fraud; phony scientific doctrines, just biology, not economics.) The fuedal one world government has been the goal of the British Empire since before it was British and it was Venetian. Who are they? The Crown, the Royal families, other aristocratic families, the hofjuden, the various Orders. The Gates, Zuckerbergs, Schwatzs, Bezozs, Musks are front men for Empire projects. The rabbit hole is deep.
Deep indeed....
and about what drives it.. i dont know what would cause someone to maliciously and deviously inflict on people what they have done, are doing to us. Its a subversion of knowledge so we destroy, murder and enslave ourselves. The majority of doctors believe vaccination is a critically good thing, but the biology is a lie. Its a mantra theyre taught without high fidelity understanding. And we are taught to do what they say. I think its evil beyond comprehension. I can understand people who view it as biblical good versus evil, but they are not gods and they have tried this before. They will fail this time too. A compassionate, humanist movement will win.
The data they want is our genetics. Its a few 5mins clips of Couey.
https://neveragainisnowglobal.substack.com/p/the-data-they-want-is-the-genetics
Outstanding comment.
An excellent article as always. Mind you, I’ve come to the view that informed consent is rarely possible. Aside from informing individuals about the positive and negative consequences of a particular treatment, doctors should also consider alternative approaches which includes doing nothing. Considering that they’re obliged to follow clinical guidelines which prioritises pharmaceuticals over naturopathic approaches, a truly informed decision is rarely supported or even possible.
Valerie, re “Considering that they’re obliged to follow clinical guidelines which prioritises pharmaceuticals over naturopathic approaches…”
This is what must be challenged, the prioritisation of pharmaceuticals, and failure to obtain informed consent. This must be brought out into the light.
I enjoy your posts Elizabeth but Malik hasn't really been cancelled out of any anything. This whole health freedom space is dominated by fakes and frauds curating false arguments keeping debate away from challenging the core issues of this budding biosecurity state, which is; the biology is a lie. Take some time to listen to Jay Couey PhD. Here's a good one https://stream.gigaohm.bio/w/9AAFQnqSorhnEtYF875mxj
And another incredible one https://stream.gigaohm.bio/w/3442q71n6uzwMckdXtxa7N
Thanks for the links too.
Re the big picture, have you heard of David Hughes?
https://dhughes.substack.com/
I’m currently reading his book:
Wall Street, the Nazis, and the Crimes of the Deep State
https://www.skyhorsepublishing.com/9781510779860/wall-street-the-nazis-and-the-crimes-of-the-deep-state
It’s so shocking how bad all this is!
My illusions are truly dissolved…
Elizabeth, listen to the 6 min rant of CBA boss in Aus Senate about how Australians starting to ask questions about the how's and why's of major policies and institutions governing their lives, is a threat to him. Its not unrelated.
https://youtu.be/QYqP6PTcPPY?si=L1RZ_v_YCRCS782V&t=1942
Elizabeth, I'm bit over half way through Wall Street, Nazis and the Crimes of the Deep State. Thank you again for the link. I have read many of the referenced books and this is a really good concise summary. I think it under plays City of London (Wall St is the junior partner) and if the author were to trace back a few more generations he would detail the Nazi links to the British Empire (which it only touches in passing). Nazism wasn't a spontaneous German growth that got support from Wall St bankers and industrialists. It has deeper roots in (British) Empire oligarchy and strategy. But my comment.... Chapter 5; The Deep State explains the OSS/CIA/etc is really a war on the USA democracy, not Soviets, China etc. This is key! Though bearly recognisable today due to 250 years of Empire subversion after losing the colony, in the original USA was the self organised, fairly represented, moral basis of political economy that was THE answer to hereditary oligarchy and their slave Empire. The idea caught like wildfire around the world during mid to late 1800s. Its arguably why WW1 happened (destroy this movement) and WW2 (to establish Empire's world gov, though Hitler didnt stick to the plan) and we're still kind of in WW2, just with a changed focus to slower tactics of institutional subversion and psychological control. If we don't get that original USA back in the current USA (we came close in Australia with the early Labor movement but Australia has never had the freedom and citizen protections of self organised political economy), the Five Eyes, Europe, Japan and many others are likely doomed to hundreds, maybe a 1000 years, of oligarchy dictatorship (with a democratic veneer) that, at the very least we know from COVID will involve genetic experimentation, but likely be much darker than the Nazis. Read political history detailed by Matt Ehret, Anton Chaitken, Executive Intelligence Review and the Australian Citizens Party. Believe it for not the fight for a People's Bank is much the same fight as the one for informed consent. The scientific lies of pandemic biology are fundamentally the same as the scientific lies of neoliberal economics. What's at hand is so big, so ingrained and so fundamental to how our society is presently organised.
Thanks for your comments Ben.
The ‘health freedom space’ is such a tricky space, so many competing personalities now on the scene.
I started investigating vaccination policy in 2008, specifically pet vaccination at first, after one of my dogs became very ill and was put down after what I subsequently discovered was gross over-vaccination every year. And this led me to questioning human vaccination.
Before Covid, it was practically impossible to question vaccination, an absolute no go area. But now the Covid debacle is helping open up this area to other critical thinkers.
There’s a lot of newcomers on the scene, with titles, ‘doctor’, ‘professor’, and they take up a lot of the oxygen, but how many are controlled opposition?
I think Ahmad has done great work with his podcasts. It’s his own voyage of discovery and he’s helping to share many different perspectives, including offering me the opportunity twice to chat about vaccination. This was unheard of for me before Covid.
Ahmad has lost his career as a surgeon, it’s no joke. I think he’s sincere in questioning the narrative. I first heard from him over two years ago, after he saw my BMJ rapid response published in March 2020, see: Is it ethical to impede access to natural immunity? The case of SARS-CoV2: https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.m1089/rr-6
Certainly there aren’t many other doctors like Ahmad willing to speak out.
Here we are five years into this thing, it’s unbloodybelievable they are still trying to pull this scam. Way past time it was all exposed and blown sky high!
It was Couey who showed me the deception in the social media movement, with all of its vigorous debate in a very limited spectrum. Few of them go after the right questions. That the biology is a lie (and its not the same as "no viruses"). If you listen Couey present, he is qualified, was intimately involved and has integrity, honestly you rarely see, I promise you, you'll see the Maliks and many others very differently, for what they are; protecting the base narrative of the biosecurity state with vigorous debate in topics that won't derail it. David's book looks great. Thankyou for the tip
"Doctors and other medical professionals are subject to punishment by captured regulatory bodies such as the GMC in the UK, and Ahpra in Australia, if they question prescriptive medical ‘guidelines’ - e.g. vaccination ‘recommendations’ which have morphed into mandates in countries such as the UK, Australia, the United States, Canada, New Zealand, and elsewhere."
The Five Eyes... up to their necks where the Covid Crimes are concerned.
Agree. "Doctors and other medical professionals are subject to punishment by captured regulatory bodies such as the GMC in the UK, and Ahpra in Australia . . . "
They Need to to Cut The Strings From Their Puppet Masters. Otherwise, They Are Forever Indentured aka Criminal Subordinates to Their Masters.
Do Not Trust The Indentured.
🇦🇺💉”Don’t delay COVID-19 booster vaccination, study reveals” ~ Doherty Institute, 29 August 2024: https://www.doherty.edu.au/news-events/news/dont-delay-covid-19-booster-vaccination-study-reveals