"L.P. was given a nametag with another student's name on it. The student whose name was on the tag had already received a dose earlier in the day." So if L.P. HAD been that other student he would have been given 2 doses on the same day? I'm running out of words to express outrage.
The number with the name tag is a ruse to finally get the child on the needle. It doesn't make sense from any point of view, as you've already explained. Then the child should never have been 'immunised' because it had apparently already received the needle earlier in the day. They cheated the child of its right to bodily autonomy. Abuse is the term for this.
“Then the child should never have been 'immunised' because it had apparently already received the needle earlier in the day.”
Exactly.
They are so careless about vaccination, and so expecting to impose this medical intervention without question. It’s a huge disaster area! Particularly for the medical ‘profession’ if the public wakes up to what they’ve been getting away with for years.
This is pure tarrany . You may disagree with the parent's beliefs on vaccines, but when our nation ignores a parent's directive and the courts uphold, YOU have lost some of YOUR rights and you are on the slippery slope of losng more. Can't tell you how angry I am about this. As retired psychologist, I believe in the sanctity of parental rights as long as there is no abuse.
I think if someone INSERTED something into my child after I and they said no, it's technically rape/assault.
If the kid dies, it's also manslaughter.
But then, try convincing idiot judges and lawyers this.
Some of them are injured themselves but their heads are so far up their asses in blind belief (similar to major religion) that they think that's impossible.
“Belief is the death of intelligence. As soon as one believes a doctrine of any sort, or assumes certitude, one stops thinking about that aspect of existence.” - Robert Anton Wilson
------
“The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wise people so full of doubts.” -Bertrand Russell
---------
"Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." - Mark Twain
This is horrible. Technically could be attempted murder.
The big lesson though is do not put ones children in any government school. From a biblical perspective in these times, it's actually Sin to put ones child in a government school. It's total parental neglect of their child.
There are non government schools. But some are as bad even though you pay thru the roof. This select carefully. Home school is the Best answer. Can't do that, then learn how to. Still can't, then let another trusted family home school. Nothing wrong with a couple of family's homeschooling in one home.
A law suit is needed for this child but lesson is never be in these govt institutions.
I agree about attempted murder, even it's rape/assault as they both said no.
But as for schooling, perhaps you have money but it's already hard enough to make ends meet and private schools are expensive.
I went through public school with my parents warning me about not trusting the school and saying no unless they could be around to help me decide.
As for churches, quite a few around me ran vaccine drives 😂. I'm also not cool with major religions as they condoned, if not promoted witch burnings which are also murder, but "legal" because the church had power back then.
Jesus said the temple is within. I agree with that. Don't trust any authority.... Trust yourself
Communism - it's well documented - the State replaces the parent. They want your children. State-controlled schooling is just another part of the program. It was introduced here (Victoria, Australia) in the 19th century expressly to counteract the influence of Christianity in the home and in Christian schools. In a Christian society the biological parent is responsible for the child. No parent should tolerate any kind of interference with their child by strangers, including school or state officials.
Yes, I wondered about this too Gaz. All these lawsuits appear to be taking place in the wrong legal arena. My understanding is that any medical intervention given without consent leads to civil/criminal wrong of assault/battery perpetrated by the injector.... the health practitioner has the legal obligation to obtain consent, no one else. I still cannot understand how the state can pretend it can legally override this...
In other words, that it can legalise assault and battery. The mind boggles.
“My understanding is that any medical intervention given without consent leads to civil/criminal wrong of assault/battery perpetrated by the injector.... the health practitioner has the legal obligation to obtain consent, no one else. I still cannot understand how the state can pretend it can legally override this...”
Exactly Emma.
‘The State’ has to be brought to account…or more specifically the specific ‘public officers’ who have facilitated this shambles…
For instance Scott Morrison, Daniel Andrews, Mark McGowan and others who were in National Cabinet, and Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly and other members of the AHPPC: The destruction of voluntary informed consent via mandatory COVID-19 vaccination. “A political decision, not a health decision”: https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/the-destruction-of-voluntary-informed
It is tyranny and fanaticism, I am ashamed to say I received vaccines pre 2020 and did not question them which allowed this to happen. Even with this acceptance I knew when I was witness to the fanaticism of 2020 regarding the covid injections that there was something seriously wrong, when in the history of man has anything good come from fanatics?
The 5th generation warfare has us normalising the acceptance of these events
Forcing people against there will to take injections is supposedly legislated in New Zealand and Australia. They are not laws, just words on a page and marketing by the perception management complex and its many operatives.
Saying - that's the law - is part of the deception of this type of psychological assault. The law is now 'communitarian' according to the judiciary, and for the 'greater good' and its many cult followers, depopulation is for the greater good, and weaponised injections are an effective aspect in the killbox toolbox.
The 70s NSSM / Kissinger Report reflects the 'urgency of depopulation' according to the world over govern/ment and its minions in every UN signatory country.
If you believe culling humans is lawful, keep believing in the most dangerous superstition - govern / ment and their alleged authority - supposed right of politicians policies over yours and your families bodies.
The lede of this article is the PREP Act; how this became law is unfathomable.
The United States doesn’t have the authority to allow injury/death to occur without due process... our Constitution provides that protection.
Military personnel can face death squarely in the face because they are not civilians and that is why military personnel are reclassified but school children are not reclassified and should never have confront this situation. By invoking the PREP Act maybe this can make it to SCOTUS.
It’s like a dozen soldiers firing at an execution but only one having the gun with a bullet. They all become implicated, but who delivered the kill shot!?!?
"L.P. was given a nametag with another student's name on it. The student whose name was on the tag had already received a dose earlier in the day." So if L.P. HAD been that other student he would have been given 2 doses on the same day? I'm running out of words to express outrage.
The number with the name tag is a ruse to finally get the child on the needle. It doesn't make sense from any point of view, as you've already explained. Then the child should never have been 'immunised' because it had apparently already received the needle earlier in the day. They cheated the child of its right to bodily autonomy. Abuse is the term for this.
“Then the child should never have been 'immunised' because it had apparently already received the needle earlier in the day.”
Exactly.
They are so careless about vaccination, and so expecting to impose this medical intervention without question. It’s a huge disaster area! Particularly for the medical ‘profession’ if the public wakes up to what they’ve been getting away with for years.
This is pure tarrany . You may disagree with the parent's beliefs on vaccines, but when our nation ignores a parent's directive and the courts uphold, YOU have lost some of YOUR rights and you are on the slippery slope of losng more. Can't tell you how angry I am about this. As retired psychologist, I believe in the sanctity of parental rights as long as there is no abuse.
MISTAKE? BS
I feel sick thinking about what this family and child must be going through. Beyond words.
I think if someone INSERTED something into my child after I and they said no, it's technically rape/assault.
If the kid dies, it's also manslaughter.
But then, try convincing idiot judges and lawyers this.
Some of them are injured themselves but their heads are so far up their asses in blind belief (similar to major religion) that they think that's impossible.
“Belief is the death of intelligence. As soon as one believes a doctrine of any sort, or assumes certitude, one stops thinking about that aspect of existence.” - Robert Anton Wilson
------
“The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wise people so full of doubts.” -Bertrand Russell
---------
"Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." - Mark Twain
This is horrible. Technically could be attempted murder.
The big lesson though is do not put ones children in any government school. From a biblical perspective in these times, it's actually Sin to put ones child in a government school. It's total parental neglect of their child.
There are non government schools. But some are as bad even though you pay thru the roof. This select carefully. Home school is the Best answer. Can't do that, then learn how to. Still can't, then let another trusted family home school. Nothing wrong with a couple of family's homeschooling in one home.
A law suit is needed for this child but lesson is never be in these govt institutions.
I agree about attempted murder, even it's rape/assault as they both said no.
But as for schooling, perhaps you have money but it's already hard enough to make ends meet and private schools are expensive.
I went through public school with my parents warning me about not trusting the school and saying no unless they could be around to help me decide.
As for churches, quite a few around me ran vaccine drives 😂. I'm also not cool with major religions as they condoned, if not promoted witch burnings which are also murder, but "legal" because the church had power back then.
Jesus said the temple is within. I agree with that. Don't trust any authority.... Trust yourself
https://robc137.substack.com/p/mr-robot-finale-wisdom
Communism - it's well documented - the State replaces the parent. They want your children. State-controlled schooling is just another part of the program. It was introduced here (Victoria, Australia) in the 19th century expressly to counteract the influence of Christianity in the home and in Christian schools. In a Christian society the biological parent is responsible for the child. No parent should tolerate any kind of interference with their child by strangers, including school or state officials.
They knew what they were doing all e
We are absolutely living in tyranny, until enough people wake up and are prepared to resist it will only get worse
You don’t sue the school district you sue the man or woman in their private capacity!
Yes, I wondered about this too Gaz. All these lawsuits appear to be taking place in the wrong legal arena. My understanding is that any medical intervention given without consent leads to civil/criminal wrong of assault/battery perpetrated by the injector.... the health practitioner has the legal obligation to obtain consent, no one else. I still cannot understand how the state can pretend it can legally override this...
In other words, that it can legalise assault and battery. The mind boggles.
“My understanding is that any medical intervention given without consent leads to civil/criminal wrong of assault/battery perpetrated by the injector.... the health practitioner has the legal obligation to obtain consent, no one else. I still cannot understand how the state can pretend it can legally override this...”
Exactly Emma.
‘The State’ has to be brought to account…or more specifically the specific ‘public officers’ who have facilitated this shambles…
For instance Scott Morrison, Daniel Andrews, Mark McGowan and others who were in National Cabinet, and Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly and other members of the AHPPC: The destruction of voluntary informed consent via mandatory COVID-19 vaccination. “A political decision, not a health decision”: https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/the-destruction-of-voluntary-informed
It is tyranny and fanaticism, I am ashamed to say I received vaccines pre 2020 and did not question them which allowed this to happen. Even with this acceptance I knew when I was witness to the fanaticism of 2020 regarding the covid injections that there was something seriously wrong, when in the history of man has anything good come from fanatics?
Unfortunately this will continue until they are hanged.
The 5th generation warfare has us normalising the acceptance of these events
Forcing people against there will to take injections is supposedly legislated in New Zealand and Australia. They are not laws, just words on a page and marketing by the perception management complex and its many operatives.
Saying - that's the law - is part of the deception of this type of psychological assault. The law is now 'communitarian' according to the judiciary, and for the 'greater good' and its many cult followers, depopulation is for the greater good, and weaponised injections are an effective aspect in the killbox toolbox.
The 70s NSSM / Kissinger Report reflects the 'urgency of depopulation' according to the world over govern/ment and its minions in every UN signatory country.
If you believe culling humans is lawful, keep believing in the most dangerous superstition - govern / ment and their alleged authority - supposed right of politicians policies over yours and your families bodies.
Larken Rose's book should be read by everyone
The Most Dangerous Superstition
Agreed!
The lede of this article is the PREP Act; how this became law is unfathomable.
The United States doesn’t have the authority to allow injury/death to occur without due process... our Constitution provides that protection.
Military personnel can face death squarely in the face because they are not civilians and that is why military personnel are reclassified but school children are not reclassified and should never have confront this situation. By invoking the PREP Act maybe this can make it to SCOTUS.
It’s like a dozen soldiers firing at an execution but only one having the gun with a bullet. They all become implicated, but who delivered the kill shot!?!?