"We're not going back to normal"

"Social distancing is here to stay for much more than a few weeks. It will upend our way of life, in some ways forever"

It was out in the open on 17 March 2020, the plan to “upend our way of life” via the Covid scam, that “we’re not going back to normal”, as laid out by Gideon Lichfield in the MIT Technology Review:

To stop coronavirus we will need to radically change almost everything we do: how we work, exercise, socialize, shop, manage our health, educate our kids, take care of family members.

We all want things to go back to normal quickly. But what most of us have probably not yet realized—yet will soon—is that things won’t go back to normal after a few weeks, or even a few months. Some things never will.

Lichfield’s article was published just the day after the now notorious Neil Ferguson et al Imperial College Report 9, which recommended suppression of ‘the virus’ “until a vaccine becomes available (potentially 18 months or more)…”

Quoting from Lichfield’s article:

As long as someone in the world has the virus, breakouts can and will keep recurring without stringent controls to contain them. In a report yesterday (pdf), researchers at Imperial College London proposed a way of doing this: impose more extreme social distancing measures every time admissions to intensive care units (ICUs) start to spike, and relax them each time admissions fall. Here’s how that looks in a graph.

The orange line is ICU admissions. Each time they rise above a threshold—say, 100 per week—the country would close all schools and most universities and adopt social distancing. When they drop below 50, those measures would be lifted, but people with symptoms or whose family members have symptoms would still be confined at home.

What counts as “social distancing”? The researchers define it as “All households reduce contact outside household, school or workplace by 75%.” That doesn’t mean you get to go out with your friends once a week instead of four times. It means everyone does everything they can to minimize social contact, and overall, the number of contacts falls by 75%.

Under this model, the researchers conclude, social distancing and school closures would need to be in force some two-thirds of the time—roughly two months on and one month off—until a vaccine is available, which will take at least 18 months (if it works at all). They note that the results are “qualitatively similar for the US.”

(My emphasis.)

That was the plan, ‘upend our way of life’, and drive people crazy with lockdowns and restrictions, until they would agree to anything to get out of the trap - such as submit to fast-tracked experimental vaccine products.

It was never really about ‘slowing the spread’, it was always about facilitating the vaccines and social control, as clearly demonstrated in that graph in Neil Ferguson et al’s Imperial College Report 9, the report that failed to disclose Ferguson’s conflict of interest, i.e. he is funded by arguably the world’s biggest vaccine promoter, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Suggest people have a close look at Gideon Lichfield’s article, to remember what they had planned for us. There seems to be a lot of collective amnesia about this, the plan to steal our freedom.

For more background, also consider watching the documentary We’re Living in 12 Monkeys, which was recorded on 19 March 2020. Quite remarkable to think this commentary was in the public domain so early…but who took any notice?

So much to look back on now, considering the manufactured Covid debacle, the biggest crime of all time.