My Presentation to Medical Doctors for Covid Ethics International
Without voluntary informed consent a practitioner cannot ethically proceed
Presentation to Medical Doctors for Covid Ethics International - March 2026
Recently Dr Stephen Frost of Medical Doctors for Covid Ethics International invited me to present again to the group, moderated by Charles Kovess.
My presentation runs for about 25 minutes, followed by questions and discussion, and is available via this Rumble link, starts about four minutes in: https://rumble.com/v76hti0-elizabeth-hart.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp_a The PowerPoint slides are accessible here.
My presentation is titled:
“Without voluntary informed consent a practitioner cannot ethically proceed. When this holds, everything else follows.”
During the presentation I refer to the recent Four Corners report ‘Scarred’, concerning a Melbourne surgeon who carried out unnecessary interventions on young women, telling them they had severe endometriosis while failing to disclose that their pathology showed little or no signs of the disease.
This program resonated strongly with me because it highlights a familiar pattern in medicine: patients trusting practitioners, warnings and complaints being raised, and institutions failing to respond until much later.
Watching the program, I was struck by parallels with what occurred during the Covid response. Mass populations were told they faced a serious threat from Covid and that repeated vaccination was necessary, despite the absence of clear evidence that most of the population faced a serious risk from the respiratory symptoms labelled COVID-19.
I strongly recommend that people view the Four Corners program, and reflect on how the complaints, warnings, and red flags about the Melbourne surgeon were ignored. A similar pattern occurred on a far larger scale during the mass population COVID-19 vaccination campaign.
In my presentation to Medical Doctors for Covid Ethics International I also outline my current work. This includes seeking clarification from the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (Ahpra) regarding its position on voluntary informed consent for vaccination.
I have also lodged formal notifications with regulators concerning senior medical figures such as Dr Christopher Perry and Professor Brendan Murphy, who publicly shaped the consent environment during the Covid period.
In addition, I am undertaking correspondence with media organisations such as Nine Network and the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, seeking accountability for information that was presented to the public during the Covid response.
This ongoing correspondence forms part of a documentary record challenging vaccination policy.
During my presentation I also discuss what I describe as a regulatory asymmetry. Frontline doctors who deviated from the vaccination program faced rapid regulatory action, while senior and influential medical figures who publicly shaped the consent environment and promoted vaccination mandates have not faced equivalent scrutiny.
Coercive vaccination policy was not restricted to Australia, and I also touch on developments in the United Kingdom and the United States.
In concluding the presentation, I return to the Four Corners program and the exposure of the surgeon who carried out unnecessary interventions on young women. One whistleblower doctor interviewed in the program expressed the hope that this case would become a turning point in medicine:
“I hope this will be a changing point for us in medicine when we do not blame the people that speak up.”
Likewise I hope we are approaching a time where people can speak up freely to challenge the Covid response, particularly coercive and mandatory vaccination policies.
Finally I return to the fundamental ethical principle:
“Without voluntary informed consent a practitioner cannot ethically proceed. When this holds, everything else follows.”
This is what must come out into the light.
If readers consider the issue of voluntary informed consent in medical practice important, they are welcome to share this presentation with colleagues or others who may be interested in the discussion.
Here also is a link to my previous presentation to Medical Doctors for Covid Ethics International, in January 2025:
Valid Informed Consent - Is this the key to taking down the House of Cards?
Stephen Frost of Medical Doctors for Covid Ethics International kindly invited me to present to his group, moderated by Charles Kovess.
Acknowledgement: ChatGPT was used by the author as a collaborative reasoning and drafting tool for this article.
Comments are disabled to keep the focus on the documentary record.
Readers who wish to provide additional information or corrections are welcome to contact me directly.




For readers interested in some additional issues raised during my presentation, I also referred to the following matters:
- Australia's COVID-19 vaccine procurement: The Australian Government reportedly contracted for 280 million COVID-19 vaccine doses for a population of approx. 26 million, as announced in July 2021: https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/federal-government-secures-extra-85-million-covid-19-pfizer-booster-shots-from-next-year/9td00xo0m
Around 75 million doses have reportedly been administered by practitioners, many during a period of coercive policies and mandates. What is the status of the remaining 205 million doses, and what obligations remain under those contracts?
- Vaccination 'exemptions' and informed consent: Doctors such as Mark Hobart and Duncan Syme faced regulatory action from Ahpra for issuing vaccine exemptions. Yet the concept of vaccination exemptions itself raises an important ethical question. If practitioners are required to obtain valid voluntary informed consent, then exemptions should not be necessary. A patient who does not consent should simply not receive the intervention. I raised this matter in my email to Health Minister Mark Butler in May 2023, see: 'Exemptions' for Covid-19 vaccinations directly contradicts voluntary informed consent: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/exemptions-for-covid-19-vaccinations-directly-contradicts-voluntary-informed-consent.pdf
- Notification regarding former Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly: I also referred to my notification to Ahpra concerning Paul Kelly, who endorsed compulsory vaccination of aged care workers following demands from then Prime Minister Scott Morrison and National Cabinet in June 2021. In my view, this endorsement helped break the principle of voluntary informed consent and opened the door to widespread vaccination mandates. My notification to Ahpra can be read here: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/notification-to-ahpra-re-medical-practitioner-paul-kelly.pdf