Covid-19 Inquiries...in the UK and Australia...
AKA whitewashing..
In the UK, a group of public health scholars and academics has forwarded an open letter challenging Heather Hallett, Chair of the UK Covid Inquiry, arguing “The Inquiry must urgently address its apparent biases, assumptions, impartiality, & lack of evidence-based approach”.
The UK Covid Inquiry is a sham, the main focus of which is to defend actions taken by the UK Government and its advisers during the manufactured Covid crisis.
For instance, as noted in the open letter, the UK Covid-19 Inquiry:
has given preferential treatment to scientific advisers on SAGE, who have a vested interest in maintaining the justification for their policy recommendations. Very few scientists with an alternative position have been asked to testify, and the Inquiry has been confrontational rather than inquisitorial in its questioning of these views. The Inquiry has not seriously questioned the hypotheses and assumptions offered to government, especially from government appointed modelers, which were used to justify Covid policies. Neither has it seriously examined the social and economic costs of lockdown.
I made a submission to the UK Covid-19 Inquiry, questioning the evaluation process for a global ‘vaccine solution’ to a virus it was known from the beginning wasn’t a serious threat to most people, including reference to the notorious Imperial College modelling, authored by Neil Ferguson et al, which did not disclose Neil Ferguson’s conflict of interest, i.e. he’s funded by arguably the world’s biggest vaccine promoter, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
I’ve seen no evidence that any of the serious matters raised in my submission to the UK Covid-19 Inquiry have received any attention.
Do we face a similar whitewash in Australia? See Phillip Altman’s recent substack post for his rightfully sarcastic take on Australia’s COVID-19 Inquiry.
I made a submission to the Australian Covid-19 Inquiry, again questioning mass population vaccination against a disease it was known from the beginning wasn’t a serious threat to most people.
In particular I argue there is no valid consent for the millions of Covid-19 vaccinations administered in Australia, with the population coerced and even MANDATED to submit to these medical interventions.
It’s appalling that the medical ‘profession’ largely supported coercive and mandated medical interventions…in a supposedly free country!
As I argue in my submission to the Australian Covid-19 Inquiry, submitted in December 2023:
This is the biggest scandal of all time. The entire country was pressured, coerced and manipulated to submit to the Covid-19 injections at the behest of politicians, 'medical/health' officers, the medical 'profession', academics, and the mainstream media.
Probably millions have submitted to the jabs under MANDATES to maintain their livelihoods and participate in civil society - 'No Jab, No Job'...'No Jab, No Life'…NO VALID CONSENT.
The judicial system has supported these mandated medical interventions, apparently unaware of practitioners' legal and ethical obligation to obtain valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination.
And the practitioners do not have specific medical indemnity for administering the Covid jabs. They might think they do, but they don't, because the Morrison Government lied to them about this, around the time of the AstraZeneca blood clots emerging in 2021.
Meanwhile, in November 2022, the Department of Health and Aged Care also confirmed to me: “Informed consent should be obtained for every COVID-19 vaccination, as per usual consent procedures for other vaccinations.”
Who knew?!
Apparently not the practitioners who have administered the 69.3 million jabs across a population that has been subjected to coercion and vaccination mandates.
In the past I have copied Catherine Bennett, one the of Australian Covid-19 Inquiry panel members, on my correspondence, see for instance my email challenging Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly about the scientific and medical justification for Covid-19 vaccination mandates, sent on 19 October 2022.
Catherine Bennett was copied on my email as she seeks to be influential on Covid-19 vaccination policy, including promoting Covid-19 vaccination.
Catherine Bennett responded to me saying:
STOP writing to me. REMOVE me from this email cc list. I will NOT ask again Hopefully that is clear enough for you
And now here is Catherine Bennett overseeing the Australian Covid-19 inquiry, an individual who has obvious contempt for the valid concerns of the public.
This is the dilemma facing members of the public seeking accountability from those people influencing taxpayer-funded vaccination policy - where are we to turn? There is little or no accountability in this rotten system operating in Australia.
I have absolutely no confidence in the Australian Covid-19 Inquiry associated with Catherine Bennett.
Recently I made a similar submission re the Terms of Reference for a Covid-19 Royal Commission. Is this yet another futile submission?
The court of public opinion must be informed - there must be accountability for the deliberately manufactured Covid crisis, the biggest crime of all time.
All of the covid-19 inquiries are circuses and the populations are mere spectators, all they will do is confirm that the actions taken were appropriate probably with some minor criticisms to give the appearance of authenticity. We never escaped from the brutal treatment of the covid period and what we are experiencing now is a lull, there has been no reversal, no reforms all of the laws are in place for this debacle to be repeated. What "this" is could be anything the government or WHO deem a threat and then the nightmare will begin again.
Great information Elizabeth, let's invite EVERYONE to DEMAND the National Cabinet Documents & let's see if Catherine is on the right track or was just in on it from the get go. As mentioned in the achieve nothing ever, "Senate Inquiries" this "once in a hundred years" pandemic has apparently affected ALL of US. If that is so & there is nothing to hide, show us the proof that these decisions were vital in the "saving of Australia" whilst destroying it.